Hi,
Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, you probably should really convert. Convert to Pixels
would infact destroy the text object, and make it a real
image. And of course, while destroying the text object, you can no
longer edit the text.
The text layer is always a real
If you can build from source then you are probably more developer than
user anyway.
This isn't actually so big problem under Redhat 9 or Redhat 7.3 with
Ximian Desktop 2.
1. Have proper devel rpms installed.
2. ./configure make
3. su -
4. cd ...
5. make install
It doesn't seem so hard to me.
On 27 Jul 2003, at 23:00, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 27-Jul-2003, Branko Collin wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003, at 18:19, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
Did you prefer 1.3 in January 2001?
Did 1.3 exist in january 2001?
As far as I can tell (from
Hi,
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So is the current 1.3.x build environment documented in the HACKING
file (or elsewhere)?
I'm guessing that the file is probably out of date, or lacking things.
It is documented in INSTALL, I don't think it is missing things and it
certainly is
Hi,
Alastair Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's only recently I've installed GTK2 and got the PangoFT2 bits
working - and it is a laborious and painful process.
Could you please explain what's so painful about it? Almost all
distributions include packages for it for quite some time
Hi Sven,
On Monday 28 July 2003 4:55 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Could you please explain what's so painful about it? Almost all
distributions include packages for it for quite some time already and
even compiling from source is pretty much straight-forward.
OK, maybe painful was an
Hi,
Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to that, having editable font boxen is very nice. (Though, Id like a
way to force it to be a rendered layer, because when you change the
layer, and accidently edit the layer's text, it erases everything
you did.)
Yes, we should probably have
Am Die, 2003-07-29 um 01.06 schrieb Alastair Robinson:
OK, maybe painful was an exaggeration; really it was just time-consuming;
I'm using SuSE 8.0, and don't have -devel packages for even gtk+-1.2 packages
on the original CDs.
Interesting, I'm pretty sure I put the devel packages on the CD.
On 29-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Yes, we should probably have Convert to Pixels for text layers.
Since internally we wouldn't really convert, should we perhaps even
stick a Convert to Text Layer menu entry to any ex-text-layer so it
can be converted back if necessary?
Actually, you
On 29-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
I wouldn't mind if you or someone else filed bug-reports for these two
issues...
The Convert To Pixels bug is here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118547
--
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect kids; I mean
On 26 Jul 2003, at 18:19, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 26-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
I think the problem is that 1.2 is far more used in productive work
because artists and designers are afraid running software which is
stamped alpha or beta more than just occasionally.
Wrong, Im an
On 27-Jul-2003, Branko Collin wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003, at 18:19, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
Did you prefer 1.3 in January 2001?
Did 1.3 exist in january 2001?
--
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Miguel Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
Carol Spears wrote:
maybe he doesn't have cvs access
That by no means stops anyone from submitting a patch
against 1.3.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
That gum you like is going to come back in style.
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Miguel Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I'm interested, from a project point of view, why many (a good
proportion) of the patches that we get on this mailing list or
in bugzilla from 'external' (non-CVS-account) contributors are
against 1.2.x.
I think there are a few reasons for this. The biggest of them is
that
David Neary wrote:
I think there are a few reasons for this. The biggest of them is
that setting up a gimp 1.3 compile environment [..]
automake, autoconf, libtool, gettext, intltool [..]
(png, jpeg, etc) [..] gtk+ with pangoft2, freetype2, fontconfig
[..]
At least, that's my theory :)
It's a
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 16.39 schrieb Carol Spears:
maybe he doesn't have cvs access
Doesn't make sense from three perspectives:
- One doesn't need CVS to develop a patch
- Everyone can get at least anoncvs
- There are frequent releases and other means of getting the source
I think the
On 26-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
I think the problem is that 1.2 is far more used in productive work
because artists and designers are afraid running software which is
stamped alpha or beta more than just occasionally.
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
--
Patrick Diablo-D3
Hi,
On Saturday 26 July 2003 8:04 pm, Adam D. Moss wrote:
It's a good theory, being the mysterious reason why
my own patches are made against 1.2.x and then blindly
Ditto here. There's also a common misconception, dating from the early
releases of Gnome 2.0. The first readmes said
Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 00.19 schrieb Patrick McFarland:
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
Good for you. I know at least 6 persons who do not. :)
However I'm quite interested in your reasons, would you please elaborate
so I can get some feeling what to tell people when they ask me
On 27-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Good for you. I know at least 6 persons who do not. :)
However I'm quite interested in your reasons, would you please elaborate
so I can get some feeling what to tell people when they ask me reasons
for using 1.3.
Well, the tabbed dialog boxes, docks, are
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 26-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
I think the problem is that 1.2 is far more used in productive work
because artists and designers are afraid running software which is
stamped alpha or beta more than just occasionally.
Wrong, Im an
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
I hope the maintainers find this worthy of being included in the main
Miguel Ibarra wrote:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
I hope the maintainers find this worthy of being
25 matches
Mail list logo
