Re: Toolbox (interface.c) Solaris x86 probs

2000-05-30 Thread Keith Parks
Nem W Schlecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm having a couple problems w/ gimp-1.1.x that I've been trying to figure out. The Gimp toolbox doesn't come up correctly (there is "blank" column on the right hand side), and each successive time I run the Gimp, the toolbox gets smaller and smaller.

gimp-plugin-template questions

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Turner
What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template? Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something that #include libgimp/gimpintl.h does not? How are individual user installations supposed to work? (is there a target that installs to ~/.gimp?) are config.sub and guess necessary

Re: gimp-plugin-template questions

2000-05-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template? Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something that #include libgimp/gimpintl.h does not? Yes, a lot! Actually plugin-intl.h as shipped with gimp-plugin-template is the equivalent to libgimp/std-plugins-intl.h which is

Re: Feature idea: rotate brush while following a path

2000-05-30 Thread David Hodson
Tom Rathborne wrote: On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote: [...] rotate a brush automatically according to the local tangent of the path that the brush is following. [...] [...] What other transformations could be added? How about: blur, colour rotation,

XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
Hello, dudes, Jens Finke [EMAIL PROTECTED] has sent me an amazing patch to add support for XCF file loading to gdk-pixbuf. I would really like to have this sort of functionality so that simple programs like EOG can view GIMP files. However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Phil Schwan
On May 30, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed. I would appreciate your suggestions. Do you know who

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Havoc Pennington
Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed. Well, there are not many options. a) You

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread kelly
On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are? At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost certainly others. Kelly

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Tuesday, 30 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are? At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost certainly others. I can't remember

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Michael Natterer
Austin Donnelly wrote: On Tuesday, 30 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are? At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Jens Finke
On 30 May 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote: Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed.

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread kelly
On Tue, 30 May 2000 20:04:02 +0200 (MEST), Jens Finke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think c) is the best solution. It's surely quite hard to find _all_ contributors to the code. Actually, I think that the version that was initially put into CVS was pure SP, so the CVS log should adequately

Re: gimp-plugin-template questions

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Turner
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template? Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something that #include libgimp/gimpintl.h does not? Yes, a lot! [...] I'd suggest you take a short look into

Re: IrfanView

2000-05-30 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
By default photoshop saves a flattened version of the image as well as all of the layers for backward compatibility purposes. I would assume that IrfanView is just displaying the flattened version of the image straight from the file. We may want to add similar functionality to gimp and the xcf

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Martin Baulig
Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed.

LinuxTag: Sorry, im unavailable right now.

2000-05-30 Thread Simon Budig
Hi all. Currently our local university has massive problems with the net so I'm currently not normally reachable via EMail. If you need to urgently reach me try the Adress [EMAIL PROTECTED], this is especially targeted to all people who contacted me for the Gimp-Booth at the LinuxTag. Sorry,

Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf

2000-05-30 Thread Martin Baulig
Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, then I think you misunderstood me. What I suggested was added XCF as a nice add-on to gdk-pixbuf for the situation where gdk-pixbuf is used under the GPL. Of cause, this means that you can't

Gimp-Print 3.1.5 release

2000-05-30 Thread Robert L Krawitz
This is a development release. Usual caveat about aerodynamic print heads and fine Oriental rugs apply. This is a fairly substantial release. The .tgz file is much bigger than before because of new dithering matrices. Print quality should be greatly improved. 1) Greatly improved print