On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:03:30PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:03:07PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > > pkg-config poppler-glib --modversion
> > >
> > > What does that print?
> > >
> >
> > pkg-config poppler-glib --modversion
> > Package poppler-glib was not found
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:03:07PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > pkg-config poppler-glib --modversion
> >
> > What does that print?
> >
>
> pkg-config poppler-glib --modversion
> Package poppler-glib was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 08:34:36PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Hi Marco
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > I have a Ubuntu 12.04 amd64 with libpoppler19 (libpoppler-dev) installed.
> >
> > dpkg -l|grep ii|grep poppler
> > ii libpoppler-dev 0.18.4-1ubuntu
2012/4/25 gespert...@gmail.com :
> asking because using a font that isn't free could be problematic for
> previous releases).
-previous +next :-)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/g
I like it!
I'd move the band with the logo to the left a little, maybe 10 or 15
px, to compensate the space around it. It feels like too close to the
brushes.
I think it looks pretty good.
It's true that contrast is a little week in type, but it's visible and legible.
Regarding the typeface, I chos
Hi Marco
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> I have a Ubuntu 12.04 amd64 with libpoppler19 (libpoppler-dev) installed.
>
> dpkg -l|grep ii|grep poppler
> ii libpoppler-dev 0.18.4-1ubuntu2 PDF rendering library -- development
> files
> ii libpoppler-glib8 0.18.4-1u
I have a Ubuntu 12.04 amd64 with libpoppler19 (libpoppler-dev) installed.
dpkg -l|grep ii|grep poppler
ii libpoppler-dev 0.18.4-1ubuntu2 PDF rendering library -- development files
ii libpoppler-glib8 0.18.4-1ubuntu2 PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared
library)
ii libpoppler-qt4-3 0.18.4
Am 2012-04-25 14:59, schrieb gespert...@gmail.com:
2012/4/25 Devvv:
yes it was and I'm definitely someone that enjoys colorful things :) but I
like the other proposal too, although I find it a bit too simple for a
splash screen. nevertheless its looking very serious. good work!
I finally uplo
2012/4/25 Devvv :
> yes it was and I'm definitely someone that enjoys colorful things :) but I
> like the other proposal too, although I find it a bit too simple for a
> splash screen. nevertheless its looking very serious. good work!
>
> I finally uploaded 2 more versions with a blurred line and
so i sent comparative image test in first and second email
here is comparative image test and old and new source in one archive :
http://photo.talasek.sk/special/healtool.tar.bz2
On 04/25/2012 11:57 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
Can you just make a bug with a comparative test image of what you
thi
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM, gg wrote:
> On 04/25/12 10:43, Michael Grosberg wrote:
>
>The above procedure can probably be turned into an integral part of retinex so
>that retinex only works on those parts. Perhaps >adding another slider that
>emulates what I did with the levels operation,
Can you just make a bug with a comparative test image of what you
think is wrong?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Miroslav Talasek
wrote:
> No no i grab it from git yesterday after comit
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/commit/?id=8cd272bb8024886822185e9c39be276bf1c97a4e
>
> if u compare sour
On 04/25/12 10:43, Michael Grosberg wrote:
I'd like to Discuss Retinex. I decided to do it here before submitting a
bug report.
In theory the retinex operation is very useful in fixing badly lit
images. In practice, I've had little success with it. So I decided to
fiddle around with it. My test
yes it was and I'm definitely someone that enjoys colorful things :) but I like
the other proposal too, although I find it a bit too simple for a splash
screen. nevertheless its looking very serious. good work!
I finally uploaded 2 more versions with a blurred line and without the line.
howeve
I'd like to Discuss Retinex. I decided to do it here before submitting a
bug report.
In theory the retinex operation is very useful in fixing badly lit images.
In practice, I've had little success with it. So I decided to fiddle around
with it. My test picture was a Chinese temple on a background
No no i grab it from git yesterday after comit
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/commit/?id=8cd272bb8024886822185e9c39be276bf1c97a4e
if u compare sources in attachment or in tar.bz2 file marked as new
(broken for me) u will see
also u can make diff between them and between old version and new
O
16 matches
Mail list logo
