[Gimp-developer] Gimp 2.8 : my opinion

2012-09-08 Thread Alexandre Ravaux
*BEFRORE READING, EXCUSE THE SEVERAL MISTAKES YOU MAY READ IN THIS MESSAGE. I'M FRENCH (I KONOW IT IS NOT A GREAT EXCUSE BUT I DO NOT FIND ANYTHING ELSE...)* Hello, I am a french young Gimp user (since 2.0 version) and I wish to tell my opinion about the latest version (2.8). In fact, I did not kn

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 2.8 : my opinion

2012-09-08 Thread Michael Natterer
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 00:25 +0200, Alexandre Ravaux wrote: > *BEFRORE READING, EXCUSE THE SEVERAL MISTAKES YOU MAY READ IN THIS MESSAGE. > I'M FRENCH (I KONOW IT IS NOT A GREAT EXCUSE BUT I DO NOT FIND ANYTHING > ELSE...)* > > Hello, > I am a french young Gimp user (since 2.0 version) and I wish t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reviving Tito (The menu search tool)

2012-09-08 Thread Srihari Sriraman
Just a small update- I had badly messed up the remote master on github. I think I have fixed it now. Sorry for that. (I'm still a git - beginner) This sequence of cmds works for me > git checkout upstream/master #(official gimp repo. no tito here) > git pull --rebase g...@github.com:ssrihari/gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Gimp 2.8 : my opinion

2012-09-08 Thread Jon Nordby
On 8 September 2012 09:32, Michael Natterer wrote: > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 00:25 +0200, Alexandre Ravaux wrote: >> *BEFRORE READING, EXCUSE THE SEVERAL MISTAKES YOU MAY READ IN THIS MESSAGE. >> I'M FRENCH (I KONOW IT IS NOT A GREAT EXCUSE BUT I DO NOT FIND ANYTHING >> ELSE...)* >> >> Hello, >> I a

[Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Jeremy Morton
I've looked around and it looks like GIMP doesn't have anything like Photoshop's shape layers. Shape layers are really cool because they're a path tied to a normal layer whose purpose is simply to ummask that normal layer. Photoshop then gives you a live preview of what that unmasked layer lo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reviving Tito (The menu search tool)

2012-09-08 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Srihari Sriraman wrote: > Please ensure that you pulled from the tito branch. That was it :) Well, Tito looks like fun, but tells me "Unable to open history file to write" every time I select a command from the list and press Enter. Alexandre Prokoudine http://l

[Gimp-developer] Problem with python save handler

2012-09-08 Thread Rob Antonishen
I've put together a simple python save handler for OpenSCAD surface files. It was working, but after making some changes it is no longer popping up a dialog and is failing to save. I can, however call it via the python console like pdb.file_openscad_save The code is here: http://pastebin.com/Em

Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem with python save handler

2012-09-08 Thread Chris Mohler
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Rob Antonishen wrote: > Can anyone suggest what dumb mistake I've made? Dunno if it's related but "min" and "max" are built-in functions, so you shouldn't use them for var names. Chris ___ gimp-developer-list mailing li

Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem with python save handler

2012-09-08 Thread Rob Antonishen
> > Dunno if it's related but "min" and "max" are built-in functions, so > you shouldn't use them for var names. > > Chris Thanks I caught that and changed it, but still no luck http://pastebin.com/MKUEshcx -Rob A> ___ gimp-developer-list mailing list g

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reviving Tito (The menu search tool)

2012-09-08 Thread Srihari Sriraman
> > Well, Tito looks like fun Nice to know :) "Unable to open history file to write" Normally, shouldn't show up. It may mean that tito/gimp does not have write access to the gimp-sysconf directory (gimp/etc/gimp/2.0/). Could you tell me if any related error shows up on the console? On Sat, S

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reviving Tito (The menu search tool)

2012-09-08 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 08.09.2012 18:52, Srihari Sriraman wrote: Normally, shouldn't show up. It may mean that tito/gimp does not have write access to the gimp-sysconf directory (gimp/etc/gimp/2.0/). You require write access to a directory which is part of the gimp installation? How should a normal user have tha

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Richard Gitschlag
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:34:00 +0100 > From: ad...@game-point.net > To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org; gegl-developer-l...@gnome.org > Subject: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP? > > I've looked around and it looks like GIMP doesn't have anything like > Photoshop's shape layers. Shape la

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Gimp 2.8 : my opinion

2012-09-08 Thread Alexandre Ravaux
Thank you very much the answers. I understand very well now ! :) 2012/9/8 Jon Nordby > On 8 September 2012 09:32, Michael Natterer wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 00:25 +0200, Alexandre Ravaux wrote: > >> *BEFRORE READING, EXCUSE THE SEVERAL MISTAKES YOU MAY READ IN THIS > MESSAGE. > >> I'M FR

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reviving Tito (The menu search tool)

2012-09-08 Thread Srihari Sriraman
> > You require write access to a directory which is part of the gimp > installation? How should a normal user have that? > Fixed to use the user data and config directory. Thanks! :) On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > On 08.09.2012 18:52, Srihari Sriraman wrote: > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Jeremy Morton
On 08/09/2012 18:29, Richard Gitschlag wrote: There's a slightly faster manual way: Stroke the path onto a layer mask, this keeps the "shape" of the layer separate from its actual content. True, you still have no live preview (you have to fill inside/outside of selection with 0% and 100% to set t

Re: [Gimp-developer] history of "great" bugs

2012-09-08 Thread yahvuu
Hello Saul, Am 05.09.2012 20:37, schrieb Saul Goode: > This brings us to the "overlay" mode, which most graphics programs define as > using the "screen" mode when the upper layer is bright (above middle value) > and "multiply" mode when it is dark. just a nit to pick: it is the bottom layer whi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 11:34 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote: > Are there any plans to introduce something like > this for GIMP? The GIMP plans are limited by having very few active programmers. Are you volunteering to work on a feature like this? That would indeed be awesome. Liam -- Liam Quin -

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Jeremy Morton
I think the first stage, to make it really useful, would be to incorporate the Script-fu layer effects here into GIMP proper: http://registry.gimp.org/node/186 Are they already in GIMP? I can't see most of them. Once they were in, GIMP could apply them to shape layers automatically. -- Best

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Guillermo Espertino (Gez)
El 08/09/12 16:23, Jeremy Morton escribió: I think the first stage, to make it really useful, would be to incorporate the Script-fu layer effects here into GIMP proper: http://registry.gimp.org/node/186 Are they already in GIMP? I can't see most of them. Once they were in, GIMP could apply t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Bill Skaggs
I would call this a "clipping path" rather than a shape layer. I don't think it would be very hard to implement, except for one difficulty. The last time I looked (a couple of years ago), the GIMP path system required all paths to belong to an image's path list, making it impossible for a path to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote: > Regarding the original topic, I remember there was a "vector layers" GSoC > project that never made it into GIMP. The back-end part of it did. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org __

Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?

2012-09-08 Thread Richard Gitschlag
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:02:53 +0100 > From: ad...@game-point.net > To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com > CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org; gegl-developer-l...@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP? > > On 08/09/2012 18:29, Richard Gitschlag wrote: > > There's a slightly f