Hey,
We all know GIMP takes a small while to load, and it is criminally less
than Photoshop or such heavy Softwares...
But can we do something to decrease the load time even more? Maybe load it
as fast as a plain text editor?
Maybe...
- Bring up the GIMP windows before the loading is complete
* Srihari Sriraman [12-05-11 11:27]:
> We all know GIMP takes a small while to load, and it is criminally less
> than Photoshop or such heavy Softwares...
> But can we do something to decrease the load time even more? Maybe load it
> as fast as a plain text editor?
perhaps investing in an ssd dri
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Paka wrote:
> perhaps investing in an ssd drive for your operating system and gimp will
> suffice. Below is the time from requesting load to mouse clicking on the
> kill button.
>
> 15:32 Crash: ~/Documents > time gimp
>
> (gimp:9740): GLib-WARNING **: goption.c:2
>
> Because you don't use extra plug-ins, scripts and, especially, brushes.
So true... Mine takes quite a while... like 10 seconds...
I'm thinking 1 to 2 seconds would be good.
How about loading the UI first, and carry out the rest of the loading
showing a progress bar at the screen bottom? (Bett
>
> Because you don't use extra plug-ins, scripts and, especially, brushes.
So true... Mine takes quite a while... like 10 seconds...
I'm thinking 1 to 2 seconds would be good.
How about loading the UI first, and carry out the rest of the loading
showing a progress bar at the screen bottom? (Bett
How about loading the UI first, and carry out the rest of the loading
showing a progress bar at the screen bottom? (Better still, don't show
loading progress at all :) )
So the 1-2 second start-up would not show any progress-bar on the splash
screen... making the user feel awesome! :)
Regards,
Sr
I would really prefer that not all brushes would be loaded at start
time. Loading the small preview would be ok and could be very fast. But
loading a lot of big brushes takes really long and consumes a lot of
memory, even so most of them are just grayscale images. Would be really
nice if it wou
Is it possible to implement this change before the release of 2.8?
or is it too late?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Tobias Oelgarte <
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would really prefer that not all brushes would be loaded at start time.
> Loading the small preview would be ok and co
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Srihari Sriraman wrote:
> Is it possible to implement this change before the release of 2.8?
> or is it too late?
Too late
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-deve
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Srihari Sriraman wrote:
> Is it possible to implement this change before the release of 2.8?
> or is it too late?
The window to get new features into 2.8 closed long ago.
Lazy loading has been on the table for as long as I have been with the
project, but it has ne
Resource manager plugin sounds interesting...
Maybe a category in preferences where users can check the resources they
want to load on startup...
Cool
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Srihari Sriraman
> wrote:
> > Is it possible to implement
There is the python plugin GURM http://registry.gimp.org/node/13473
I use the default resource set, and then GURM to dynamically activate
brush/gradient/pattern/palettes once gimp is running. It also does scripts
but I do not use that feature. It can't do plugins as there is no way
through the e
Am 08.12.2011 14:04, schrieb Alexia Death:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Srihari Sriraman wrote:
Is it possible to implement this change before the release of 2.8?
or is it too late?
The window to get new features into 2.8 closed long ago.
Lazy loading has been on the table for as long as I
On 12/08/2011 02:04 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Srihari Sriraman wrote:
Is it possible to implement this change before the release of 2.8?
or is it too late?
The window to get new features into 2.8 closed long ago.
Lazy loading has been on the table for as long as
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> IMHO the problem is more with the current single-level display of brushes.
> Gimp will look in subfolders of the declared folders, but it should allow
> some hierarchical navigation as well. The current interface must have been
> designed when the de
Somehow I lost focus on what i had suggested earlier...
Lazy loading apart, can we bring up the windows and allow new file creation
or importing files,
while the brushes get loaded in the background?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Ofnuts w
16 matches
Mail list logo
