Hi,
has there been any progress with respect to screenshots? Now that GIMP
HEAD starts to actually look differently and gets new features, I'd
really like to replace the screenshots on developer.gimp.org with new
ones to get people interested in the current development. So please,
grab whatever
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
PS: Here are some screenshots of the HEAD branch:
http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png
http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-stroke-dialog.png
http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-canvas-size-dialog.png
Remember that this is not the final dialog layout, we
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For what it's worth, I do not have any problem with nice, but out of
date, screenshots being on www.gimp.org - for example, we had a lot
of screenshots from the 1.1 series on www.gimp.org before the
migration. In fact, devel screenshots are a great
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For what it's worth, I do not have any problem with nice, but out of
date, screenshots being on www.gimp.org - for example, we had a lot
of screenshots from the 1.1 series on www.gimp.org before the
migration. In fact, devel
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree. I think that www.gimp.org is a site for GIMP users, and
that includes bleeding edge users. developer.gimp.org is a site for
GIMP developers, at least that was my understanding of the motivation
behind it.
Well, that was not at all the
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thus far, no-one on the web team has said anything about the
matter. It would be nice if someone would say sure, send screenshots
to me. I don't feel comfortable changing anything in the gimp-web
module any more.
Well, I am afraid that
* Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-05-04 07:49]:
Sven Neumann wrote:
If the web-site concerns you, then you should be willing to touch it.
If you aren't willing to do any changes to gimp-web CVS module, then
you should IMO refrain from asking for changes. Doing so only shows
disrespect for
Hi,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
Gentlemen (an assumption not evidenced by quoted above), opinions are
to be expressed and critized, but personalities and associated
feelings need to be excluded. Pistole at 20+ paces are *not* an
option and should not be considered. This type of display affects
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: 05 May 2004 02:13:13 +0200
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gimp Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp on Slashdot
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How many more of these
On Mon, 03 May 2004 16:52:52 -0700
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking for aa_printf in -laa... no
configure: WARNING: *** AA plug-in will not be built (AA library
not found) ***
...
checking for libgtkhtml-2.0 = 2.0.0... Package libgtkhtml-2.0
was not found in
the pkg-config
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps if voting was allowed on Gimp bugs in bugzilla it would
become apparent which features are really most important to users?
It just doesn't work that way. The developers know quite well what
features are most requested but that doesn't
I went to the Xsane site, attempted to apply the Gimp 2.x
patch, and moved Xsane to a directory where Gimp 2.0 can
find it. However Gimp still gives me a message that Xsane
does not have Gimp support compiled in. Now if the rest of
the world has had success with this patch I will try the
John, I don't know your precise setup but i am using my Epson scanner with
Gimp 2 Xsane. I submitted my setup and method yesterday with details.
Gimp 2 Epson scanners. If you missed it, I'll send it to you direct.
John Dietsch
On Wed, 5 May 2004, John Culleton wrote:
I went to the Xsane
13 matches
Mail list logo
