On 01/30/2011 02:11 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54 PM, jack whitejbw9...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thank you, but that's not installing it with no SP's installed though (as
the question was).
I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
XP VM for
On 01/30/2011 05:17 PM, jc wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:57:14 -0500, Jay Smithj...@jaysmith.com wrote:
I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
XP VM for legacy apps and testing, but the first thing I did when
setting it up was to install SP3. Why not install
On 01/22/2011 01:04 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ralph Zerbonia
ra...@universecentral.com wrote:
My question is whether or not anyone knows of any image disadvantages, is
there anything about LZW that would allow a loss of any visual fidelity?
LZW is indeed
On 10/23/2010 02:27 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mark Phillips
m...@phillipsmarketing.biz wrote:
My apologies for this OT post, but I need some help from an image expert,
and I thought the Gimp list might have one or two.
When I upload images from a friend's digital
On 10/15/2010 09:30 AM, John Culleton wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010 18:09:18 ChadBJX wrote:
Chad,
Can you print _anything_ from Gimp?
If you can print a very tiny image, maybe it is a printer memory
problem.
Sorry, I can't help further. I don't have Vista and I am sitting
here
On 09/28/2010 05:11 PM, John Mills wrote:
Finally - one I may be able to answer ..
Try scaling the image close to the size and resolution you expect to print
_before_ you add the text. I believe the text is essentially bitmapped
onto your image when you add it. If your printing implies a
On 09/13/2010 11:47 AM, jeremy jozwik wrote:
hello list, just added my self so i hope this is an active list.
im am attempting to batch compress OSM tile images. they are of png
format, otherwise i would have used cjpeg.
anyhow the script need only open the images in a folder and save them
On 09/12/2010 05:41 AM, Andreas Moroder wrote:
Hello,
I have scanned page from a book. On the screen all looks ok. Near the
images I wanted to scan I see only light shades on the white background,
but when I print the page this shades becomes much darker and visible
and show the back side of
Hi,
Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 Linux. Minimum 2GB of memory. Used to editing (but
not printing) images to 200 MB.
I am running into some strangeness that I don't know is a an error in my
actions, a general workflow problem, or a bug (or feature) in Gimp.
Starting with a (color) JPEG image
up looking so poor?
Many thanks
Leon
--
Jay Smith
e-mail: j...@jaysmith.com mailto:j...@jaysmith.com
website: http://www.JaySmith.com
Jay Smith Associates
P.O. Box 650
Snow Camp, NC 27349 USA
Phone: Int+US+336-376-9991
Toll-Free Phone in US Canada:
1-800-447-8267
Fax: Int+US
On 07/28/2010 10:27 AM, Jimmi L. Hansen wrote:
Is it possible to make a standard text in every picture feks. ©Jimmi L.
Hansen? So i dont have to make it manual every time.
Sincerely jimmi
Jimmi,
In the past I have used ImageMagick for this, processing thousands of image
files at a time
On 05/16/2010 05:52 AM, Dave wrote:
Hi,
I take a lot of photos at car shows and the like, but it's a pain going
through them manually afterwards and pixellating the number plates.
Is there a way I can define a mask or something that I can then apply to a
folder of images, which will
On 03/30/2010 01:22 PM, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 22:31 +0530, Tarun Samvedi wrote:
Is there any way of defining a sequence of actions that could be used
later?
for instance, if I apply auto-color, auto-contrast and cartoon filter
to a lot of images, is there a way of
On 03/25/2010 04:33 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
snip
P.S. More importantly, please let's be sure that all the file create
PERMISSIONS are being created correctly. I already posted a bug on
this, but I sure am getting tired of files being created with rw- r--
r-- even though the umask,
On 03/25/2010 05:39 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 16:57 -0400, Jay Smith wrote:
However, Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 2.04 refuses to create files using the
same methods that every other *nix programs use.
This can hardly be true in the general sense that you are putting
On 03/10/2010 08:48 AM, Sandi P. wrote:
I appreciate you having a look at these. They are unedited, right from the
scanner. You can see them at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37318...@n04/
Img137 is a sample of matte finish processing that even with Gaussian Blur
and Unsharpening can't
On 03/10/2010 03:27 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
2010/3/10 yahvuu yah...@gmail.com:
Each of these dialog options points at a potential interaction problem. If
the
dialog remembers an option, the user also has to remember that option.
In general, this amounts to additional
The Color Curves dialog has the black in the lower left corner and the
white in the upper right corner. This is the opposite of another
program that I also have to use. Is there a way to reverse this default?
I am using Gimp 2.6.6 on Linux, Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy.
Thanks.
Jay
--
Jay Smith
e
If this issue has not been addressed yet and if I can't find anything in
Bugzilla on it, I want to make an Enhancement Suggestion, first on the
Gimp-Developer list, then Bugzilla.
However, I don't have the quick or convenient ability to check the
current status of this issue in the most recent
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com
mailto:j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
If this issue has not been addressed yet and if I can't find anything in
Bugzilla on it, I want to make an Enhancement Suggestion, first on the
Gimp-Developer list, then Bugzilla
I hope it's okay to ask this here.
The use of tifftopnm and pnmtotiff was suggested in an earlier thread
about stripping color profiles from TIFF images.
Below I show tiffinfo before and after processing, as well as the
tifftopnm and the pnmtotiff processes.
?? On the pnmtotiff, it said:
On 02/10/2010 03:33 PM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/2/10 Donna B. for...@gimpusers.com:
I need help with a newbie question (ver 2.6). I need to select a circular
part
of a photo - the goal is to create a web page with circular photos arranged
in
a circle. The only way I've found is to draw a
On 01/22/2010 09:58 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/22/10, BGP wrote:
I'm sure you folks are all experts at GIMP but I've found it to be a
very hard to learn how to use. But how many hundreds of hours did it
take you to learn how to use it?
Learning is something you never stop to do.
On 01/22/2010 10:57 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/22/10, Jay Smith wrote:
SNIP
As an aside, I really think that the documentation issue is going to
become critical in the next couple of years. As I understand it (and
please correct me if I am wrong), anybody can contribute
At one point, the OP said something about it printing out too small but
it was an okay size on screen, just pixilated. Did I understand that
correctly.
It sounds like the OP simply has an image that is too small in terms of
X by Y pixels.
You can blow something up on screen, and increase the
Hi,
GIMP 2.6.6 running on Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Linux.
In the archives I found information that to delete a color profile, you
just set the color space (Image, Mode, Assign Color Profile...) to sRGB
which apparently is a color space without color profile.
There were three TIFF images which
GIMP 2.6.6 running on Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Linux.
Is this a bug?
Should I post this on the developer list instead?
Am I doing this incorrectly?
At a minimum, I think there is some GUI confusion... at least it is not
logical to my way of thinking.
This is a little complicated, so please read
On 12/18/2009 01:03 PM, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:26 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
Procedure:
- Select all in old image
- Copy
- Paste into the new image. This now results in a Background and a
Floating Selection. It says Floating Selection it does *NOT* say ...
Layer
On 12/18/2009 02:02 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:56 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
I _do_ have a saved sample corrupted image file if anybody needs this
for testing purposes.
Is this a bug? Is it known? Should I post on the developer list?
Should I put it in bugzilla
On 12/18/2009 01:41 PM, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 13:15 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
Thank you very much for the procedure suggestion. Really Cool!! I will
experiment with that. How would I have known that? Maybe I should
RTFM? But.
Maybe the manual mentions
On 12/18/2009 03:16 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:33 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
If I were a developer, with the necessary skills, I would be curious
about what was killing off the plugin and why the plugin dieing
(especially when it was just trying to open a dialog
On 12/18/2009 05:48 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 15:39 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
By the way, if possible, I would like to do this parasite removal on
tens of thousands of files. Perhaps as the 'exec' of a 'find' command.
I don't understand why you are even
If you don't like absolutely on-point discussion, please delete this
email now. Sometimes there is more to the situation than can be said in
20 words. Thank you.
I am glad to see some mention of this subject: color
Background:
We are on an extended migration from Windows with mixed platforms
On 08/17/2009 11:33 AM, Monika Himpelmann wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question and maybe it is easy to answer and has been answered
before although I didn't find it in the FAQ's.
When I try to scale a foto in order to get it passport photo size it
looses quality. The fotos I want to scale are
On 08/17/2009 06:38 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Jay Smith wrote:
Monika,
I agree that it does not make sense to loose quality when scaling smaller.
I'm confused I think. Isn't scaling smaller an inherently lossy
process? If there's information in a section that's 20 bits across
On 08/01/2009 08:37 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 08/01/2009 01:05 PM, photocomix wrote:
i never noticed a similar bug, even if i used Gimp to save as copy
thousands
of jpeg, and i would never believed this possible, but i have to face
evidence
to the point image dimensions: 90x116
On 07/27/2009 11:10 AM, Marc T. wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:30 +0200, Marc T. wrote:
i am on a similar problem,
i have to build a batch script that slices over 6000 images very big
images
into seven pieces.
David's Batch Processor should be able to do the job, not by slicing but
by
-Original Message-
From: gimp-user-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gimp-user-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of John Culleton
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 11:36 PM
To: Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp Manual format.
Is the Gimp online
On 06/13/2009 02:46 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jay Smithj...@jaysmith.com wrote:
[big snip]
So
I am hoping for suggestions as to a) how to avoid the color shadow of
using a colored background and b) if it cannot be avoided, how to fix it
in gimp without a
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux. (Working great, NO
crashes as some people complain of.)
The answer to this question is not as straight-forward as it sounds.
Problem:
- Scanning (xsane from within gimp) images of canceled postage stamps.
(Also tried with Photoshop/Windows using
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
I can't seem to figure out how to get the measure tool to show results
in mm.
So far the only way I have been able to figure out how to measure in mm
is to: select the region I wish to measure, copy, create from clipboard,
and then use one of the
On 05/28/2009 10:59 AM, Olivier Lecarme wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
I can't seem to figure out how to get the measure tool to show results
in mm.
So far the only way I have been able to figure out
On 05/06/2009 12:01 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
As an update, I don't see that any keyboard shortcuts are set to Alt+E
in my keyboard shortcuts default list. Naturally because the Edit menu
has the mnemonic E and Alt refers directly to the menu system in Windows
(I don't know what OS you are
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
on K Desktop Environment 3.5.10
I would like to check with others whether or not these issues are unique
to me, my installation, or my desktop environment
If they are bugs, I will report them or others are welcome to do so (but
please tell me
On 05/05/2009 09:35 PM, Owen wrote:
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
on K Desktop Environment 3.5.10
I would like to check with others whether or not these issues are
unique
to me, my installation, or my desktop environment
If they are bugs, I will report them or others
On 05/05/2009 09:36 PM, bgw wrote:
I'm using Fedora 10; GIMP 2.6.6.
Jay Smith wrote:
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
on K Desktop Environment 3.5.10
I would like to check with others whether or not these issues are unique
to me, my installation, or my desktop environment
I am using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
We have recently started using Gimp. We have to edit many (thousands)
of TIF image files originally created with Photoshop 5.0.2 or 5.5.x on
Windows.
These files open just fine in Gimp, though Gimp does not seem to utilize
the embedded preview
On 04/23/2009 10:04 AM, David Gowers wrote:
Hi Jay,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
I am using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
...
How can I tell Gimp to suppress reporting such errors and/or direct all
such errors to stderr instead of Gimp
Xsane installed].
When the scanned image comes in, as the above poster says, it is behind,
underneath, etc. I have to go fishing for it. It is mildly annoying
the first hundred times. By the 20,000th time (a realistic figure for
us) I think it will be _really_ annoying.
Jay Smith
On 04/08/2009 12:36 AM, Owen wrote:
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
If I have a newly created untitled image and I Close it, I
naturally,
and correctly, get a dialog asking me if I wish to save it or not save
it.
In that dialog, pneumonic letters are underlined, meaning that
On 04/08/2009 05:57 AM, David Gowers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
If I have a newly created untitled image and I Close it, I naturally,
and correctly, get a dialog asking me if I wish to save
On 04/08/2009 10:04 AM, malefico wrote:
David Gowers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:52 PM, malefico malef...@malefico3d.org wrote:
Hi, two rather noob questions here:
I wonder if there is any way to turn off the Snap to Guides option
which is on by default (Gimp 2.4), I look in
Norman,
I hope I have not misconstrued your question / wording.
You used the word scan in conjunction with your camera. Your camera
is not a scanner. It has a very different dpi/ppi than a scanner.
Scanners use A x B dots/pixels maximum per square inch. However, what
you get from your
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
If I have a newly created untitled image and I Close it, I naturally,
and correctly, get a dialog asking me if I wish to save it or not save it.
In that dialog, pneumonic letters are underlined, meaning that I
_should_ simply be able to type that
to 150,000 (?? maybe more) rotations, but
still I think the ctrl-shift-l is a lot faster.
Thanks very much for your help!
Jay
On 04/01/2009 09:03 PM, David Gowers wrote:
Hi Jay,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
Hi David,
If convenient, please advise me
Walter,
There are multiple issues involved. For example:
- Since you did not mention anything about calibration, consider that
the scanner, the monitor, and the printer are three different devices,
each of which has to be properly calibrated (starting at the beginning
with the scanner, then the
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
For the vast majority of my work, every time I enlarge the canvas (which
I have to do a _lot_ ), I want _all_ the Layers to enlarge as well.
However, the dialog box
Image... Canvas Size... Layers...
_always_ seems to default to None instead of
Hi David,
If convenient, please advise me of the bug number on this so that I can
track it. Thank you very much.
Related to the bug, I hope you also noted the problem that there is no
Preferences option of using black as the default for newly created images.
You said...
BTW, floating before
of the dimensions of the canvas.
Again, is there a way to get Gimp to remember this setting (either
permanently or per-session)?
I would have assumed that there is an rc file(s) somewhere that contains
every conceivable dialog box setting/value.
Jay
On 04/01/2009 12:27 PM, Jay Smith wrote:
Using Gimp
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
TIFF ONLY This problem seems *only* to be happening when
creating/saving TIFF (.tif) files. If the filetype is something else,
then the problem is not happening.
On two different workstations, being run by two different login users,
creating
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
We are testing using Gimp to replace Photoshop on Windoze. However, we
are hitting one problem/feature we have not been able to resolve.
We scan images of postage stamps (using xsane from inside gimp). There
are multiple postage stamps are on a
Andrew,
Thanks for your suggestion, but...
I must not be understanding something critically important.
I _think_ I did as you described, but after rotation the object I just
rotated seems to disappear under the transparent (checkerboard) alpha
channel, never to be seen again. If I have the
Partial Oops...
I had most recently responded to Andrew ...
I _think_ I did as you described, but after rotation the object I just
rotated seems to disappear under the transparent (checkerboard)
alpha channel, never to be seen again. If I have the black layer
underneath, then the rotated
63 matches
Mail list logo
