Whether it's recommended to have a SP or not, fact is some people do not, and
until Gimp actually requires something that a SP installs, I don't see why it
couldn't continue to allow installs on non-SP Windows, they way it did up until
a recent version change.
FYI, I have a PC with WinXP that
Jan 2011 17:51:04 +, jack white wrote:
Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?
Install SP2, install GIMP, uninstall SP2.
--
Jernej Simon?i? http://eternallybored.org
Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:03:25 +
From: jack white jbw9...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Except that 2.6.6 installs without SP2
+, jack white wrote:
I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6
works fine without a Service Pack. Does 2.6.11 really require SP2? If so,
is 2.6.7 the first version to require it?
I've had the SP2 requirement in the installer for a long time (since GIMP
I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6 works
fine without a Service Pack. Does 2.6.11 really require SP2? If so, is 2.6.7
the first version to require it?
___
Gimp-user
