Steve Bibayoff wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:45:23 -0700, Robin Laing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
But GIMP is Free Software with the source code open to everyone.
So the GIMP's development team could be as large as it's user base.
You are correct but many of the users wo
Hello,
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:45:23 -0700, Robin Laing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > But GIMP is Free Software with the source code open to everyone.
> > So the GIMP's development team could be as large as it's user base.
> You are correct but many of the users wouldn't k
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now Photoshop has the benefit of large development teams and the
necessary funding to support optimization. It would be nice to have
that with the GIMP as well.
But GIMP is Free Software with the source code open to everyone.
So the
Hi,
Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now Photoshop has the benefit of large development teams and the
> necessary funding to support optimization. It would be nice to have
> that with the GIMP as well.
But GIMP is Free Software with the source code open to everyone.
So the GIMP's devel
Dana Sibera wrote:
For GIMP - Version 2.2 on OSX, Tile Cache set to 400, 500, 600, 800 and
1400MB - all had the same results within a second or two. Any less than
400MB tile cache with this image and the visible changes in both preview
and the final 'OK' would hit a wall part way through th
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michele Petrazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On the same machine with photoshop, a preview of a "curves" tool
spend only 4-5 seconds, but when press the OK button, it spend about
the same time of gimp.
As you already guessed, the preview of the color manipulation tools in
Hi,
Michele Petrazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the same machine with photoshop, a preview of a "curves" tool
> spend only 4-5 seconds, but when press the OK button, it spend about
> the same time of gimp.
As you already guessed, the preview of the color manipulation tools in
GIMP isn't re
This message contains the results of a few comparison tests with GIMP
and Photoshop across one large image - I posted a message earlier about
some of the speed problems I was having with GIMP - and Michele
Petrazzo seemed to be indicating some similar problems in the same
areas (namely color op
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
> Hello list,
> my customer say me that he want a new graphic workstation. He said:
> "give me a good machine with win xp and photoshop for handle tiff image
> that can have 400/500 MB ", and have replied: "xp and photoshop? No!
> li
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
> >
> >>I try to install photoshop on win and it work very well with these
> >>images and bigger images.
> >>
> >
> >how about some numbers sh
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
I try to install photoshop on win and it work very well with these
images and bigger images.
how about some numbers showing that windows/photoshop work better?
On the same machine with photoshop, a preview of a "c
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
>
> I try to install photoshop on win and it work very well with these
> images and bigger images.
>
how about some numbers showing that windows/photoshop work better?
carol
___
Gimp-us
Hello list,
my customer say me that he want a new graphic workstation. He said:
"give me a good machine with win xp and photoshop for handle tiff image
that can have 400/500 MB ", and have replied: "xp and photoshop? No!
linux and gimp!".
I install it, but after a day of tries, I see that gimp can'
13 matches
Mail list logo
