Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-15 Thread Fabio S.
> > Well, in the contribs for 9.0 I can see only 1.3.8, but maybe the mirror I > > am using is not updated: which is your mirror? > > > Well it's 9.2/contrib for me then in your case you probably needs two > repository : 9.2/sources to get the stuff from standard Mandrake 9.2 and > 9.2/contrib tu

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-14 Thread raymond ostertag
Le mer 14/01/2004 à 11:54, Fabio S. a écrit : > > Well, in the contribs for 9.0 I can see only 1.3.8, but maybe the mirror I > am using is not updated: which is your mirror? > Well it's 9.2/contrib for me then in your case you probably needs two repository : 9.2/sources to get the stuff from st

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-14 Thread Fabio S.
B > > Now, I am completely happy with my system: am I forced to upgrade > > distribution just to be able to use gimp 2.0? This would really upset > > me. Note that the point is not that I am scared at upgrading the system: > > my first distro was RH 4.x and since I used at least one of any major >

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-13 Thread raymond ostertag
Le mar 13/01/2004 à 09:54, Fabio S. a écrit : > Now, I am completely happy with my system: am I forced to upgrade > distribution just to be able to use gimp 2.0? This would really upset > me. Note that the point is not that I am scared at upgrading the system: > my first distro was RH 4.x and sin

Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:03, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote: > Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), > but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is > something wrong with my installation ? > > Thanks for some information. > > Przemek Hi there, There

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-13 Thread BandiPat
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 05:47 am, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Fabio S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It seems that compiling a brand new gimp is no simple matter at > > all: following all dependencies is really a hard matter! > > Almost all distributions that I know of have all the GIMP >

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Fabio S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems that compiling a brand new gimp is no simple matter at all: > following all dependencies is really a hard matter! Almost all distributions that I know of have all the GIMP dependencies nicely packaged. Since GNOME2 has basically the same depe

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-13 Thread Fabio S.
> > > These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually > > > gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. > > > You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plug-in. > > > > Wouldn't the > > libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk > > libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk > >

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Spuhler
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:52, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > > > These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually > > > gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version g

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The most important is to be able to open (read) files from Photoshop > that are saved as CMYK (.psd files) GIMP-2.0 can open these. However since the CMYK->RGB conversion is done quite naively I am not sure the result will be useful in a professio

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually > > gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. > > You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plu

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Spuhler
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > MDK does not provide gtkhtml2-devel, but does > > libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk > > libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk > > and > > libgtkhtml-3.0_2-3.0.8-1mdk > > libgtkhtml-3.0_2-devel-3.0.8-1mdk

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Ville Pätsi
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 21:32, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > "equivalent" packages from Redhat do collide with the libraries from > MDK. This is a given. Mandrake intentionally changed package names when it "branched off" from Red Hat. If you want to make rpms for Mandrake you're going to have to create a

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MDK does not provide gtkhtml2-devel, but does > libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk > libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk > and > libgtkhtml-3.0_2-3.0.8-1mdk > libgtkhtml-3.0_2-devel-3.0.8-1mdk These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Spuhler
Well, I think I am going the hard way and compile. The prebuilt rpm's don't install because of incorrect dependencies. Trying to build rpms, is getting me further now but I'll get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gimp2]# rpmbuild -tb gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2 error: Failed build dependencies: gimp-print-deve

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That would be inaccurate... you can save as CMYK TIFF, but the > transforms are really quite simple. I am sorry Dave, but this is wrong. The TIFF plug-in included with GIMP-2.0 cannot create CMYK files. It can however read CMYK and have libtiff promot

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It compiled here using the configure, make, make install after > installing some libraries. Would be nice if I could make rpm's, but > I guess the package is not set up that way. The tarball comes with a working spec file. RPM packages for 2.0pre

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Thomas Spuhler wrote: It compiled here using the configure, make, make install after installing some libraries. Would be nice if I could make rpm's, but I guess the package is not set up that way. There is a gimp.spec file in CVS, and in the tarball, and there are GIMP RPMs pre-built by drc.

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Spuhler
9.2 system. > I think freetype 2 came installed by default here. > > Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them > configure, make, make install. > > Regards, > JS > -><- > > On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spu

Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-12 Thread Przemyslaw Gawronski
> Your version of pygtk is too old, you should use at least 1.99.15, or even > better 2.0.0. > I've updated the configure script to enforce this. I did as sugested, works like a charme, thankx. Przemek -- Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl Linux Registe

Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-12 Thread Manish Singh
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:09:55AM +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote: > Dnia Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Sven Neumann napisa?: > > > It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the > > scripts don't work. > > Yes, sorry, about leaving that out. > > Here it is: >

Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-12 Thread Przemyslaw Gawronski
Dnia Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Sven Neumann napisał: > It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the > scripts don't work. Yes, sorry, about leaving that out. Here it is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ gimp-1.3 & [1] 4311 [EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ This is a deve

Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Przemyslaw Gawronski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), > but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is > something wrong with my installation ? It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how th

[Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre & python

2004-01-12 Thread Przemyslaw Gawronski
Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is something wrong with my installation ? Thanks for some information. Przemek -- Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl Linux Reg

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Owen Cook
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 > I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. > The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency > problems Yes, I have Gimp2.0pre on Mdk 9.2 Have you installed

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Eric Pierce
gt; On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:49, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: >> ?? >> It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system. >> I think freetype 2 came installed by default here. >> >> Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them >>

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Thomas Spuhler
-><- > > On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > > [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre > > Date: Today 18:00:03 > > From: Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (TUSONIX, Inc.) > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Message was si

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a > dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to > get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Since freetype2 is used as the standard font rende

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Thomas Spuhler wrote: > [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre > Date: Today 18:00:03 > From: Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (TUSONIX, Inc.) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Message was signed with unknown key. > The validity of the signature cannot be verified. > Problem: OpenP

[Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Thomas Spuhler
Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Tom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part