The two functions, gimp_file_load_layer and layers, which I located in
my local installation's Xtns browser are not found by perl-gimp on the
server. It says, " function/macro "gimp_file_load_layers" not found in
Gimp"
Should I give up or is there a reason it might be failing? (These are
the
> The two functions, gimp_file_load_layer and layers, which I located in
> my local installation's Xtns browser are not found by perl-gimp on the
> server. It says, " function/macro "gimp_file_load_layers" not found
> in
> Gimp"
>
> Should I give up or is there a reason it might be failing? (These
Owen wrote:
The two functions, gimp_file_load_layer and layers, which I located in
my local installation's Xtns browser are not found by perl-gimp on the
server. It says, " function/macro "gimp_file_load_layers" not found
in
Gimp"
Should I give up or is there a reason it might be failing? (Thes
Kate Yoak wrote:
> The two functions, gimp_file_load_layer and layers, which I located in
> my local installation's Xtns browser are not found by perl-gimp on the
> server. It says, " function/macro "gimp_file_load_layers" not found in
> Gimp"
[snip]
> GIMP version 2.2.13
The reason you are ha
> The reason you are having a problem is because you are using a very old
> version of GIMP. GIMP 2.2 is no longer supported. The file load operations you
> are asking were added in the 2.4 version of GIMP.
>
>
Sigh. CentOS rpm is 2.2. Never even occurred to me to check!
Kind of like never o
Kate T. Yoak wrote:
>
>> The reason you are having a problem is because you are using a very
>> old version of GIMP. GIMP 2.2 is no longer supported. The file load
>> operations you
>> are asking were added in the 2.4 version of GIMP.
>>
>>
> Sigh. CentOS rpm is 2.2. Never even occurred to m
Kate T. Yoak wrote:
> Bigger sigh. :-) Upgrading to 2.4 on CentOS is a feat. A lot of
> non-supported rpms to track down. Too scary. :-) No loading layers
> for me! They say, CentOS 6 is expected to come with gimp 2.4. There is
> hoping!
If CentOS 6 is only planning on making GIMP 2.4 ava
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> If CentOS 6 is only planning on making GIMP 2.4 available you will still have
> an old version of GIMP.
Gimp 2.6 is less than a year old and still somewhat buggy. I can see
people trying to maintain a stable platform not wanting to jump to
Thanks, Mark, for a thoughtful reply. You are right about CentOS. Those
who want latest-and-greatest use Fedora. CentOS is designed for
stability. I read that somewhere. :-)
A couple of missing functions didn't offend me and I got around them.
The saving to .psd issue - well, that's more irr
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 11:44 -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> > If CentOS 6 is only planning on making GIMP 2.4 available you will still
> > have
> > an old version of GIMP.
>
> Gimp 2.6 is less than a year old and still somewhat buggy. I
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> As far as we know GIMP 2.6.4 has less known bugs than any GIMP 2.4.x
> release.
As far as you know, sure. There hasn't been as much time to find bugs
in 2.6.4 as there has been to find bugs in 2.4.x. I apologize for
overstating; I should
11 matches
Mail list logo
