[Gimp-user] c2g in Gimp 2.10.12 not performing as in 2.8

2019-11-28 Thread pistikem
. -- pistikem (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] c2g in Gimp 2.10.12 not performing as in 2.8

2019-08-10 Thread pistikem
o way to adjust the local fine-grained contrast distribution, just globally and/or manually(!). -- pistikem (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] c2g in Gimp 2.10.12 not performing as in 2.8

2019-08-09 Thread pistikem
p 2.8, right ? one definitely sees a wealth of more information in the small inserts or insets as compared to the big pictures ! i am new in this forum (and also in gimp-forum and gimpforums). how can i contact the developers as you suggested ? -- pistikem (via www.gimpusers.com/f

[Gimp-user] c2g in Gimp 2.10.12 not performing as in 2.8

2019-08-09 Thread pistikem
version to work with the appropriate set of adjustable run parameters. what about a python3 port ? i still have a few linux boxes with gimp 2.8 running but i don't see that as a good way out of this problem, perhaps as a temporary solution only... -- pistikem

[Gimp-user] c2g in Gimp 2.10.12 not performing as in 2.8

2019-08-06 Thread pistikem
o the former appearance. clicking the 'shadow' button didn't improve the result. so, the current stage of c2g is pretty useless for me - unless i do something substantially wrong. can somebody help me how to get c2g behave in Gimp 2.10 as it has in 2.8 ? -- pistikem (via www.