On 08/08/2013 09:53 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Hi
This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs. export,
etc
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote:
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to
save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote:
I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and
maintenance would be small.
Well, if it's that simple, why don't you do it?
--
Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/
On 08/10/2013 02:36 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote:
I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and
maintenance would be small.
Well, if it's that simple, why don't you do it?
Good question but I'm not developer...
--
* maderios mader...@gmail.com [08-10-13 08:58]:
On 08/10/2013 02:36 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote:
I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and
maintenance would be small.
Well, if it's that simple, why don't you
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote:
Good question but I'm not developer...
Then how can you know it's simple?
--
Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote:
Good question but I'm not developer...
Then how can you know it's simple?
*know* and *simple* are your words
I wrote :
*I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding
On 8/10/2013 9:52 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote:
Good question but I'm not developer...
Then how can you know it's simple?
*know* and *simple* are your words
I wrote :
*I think that both versions
On 10 August 2013 12:52, maderios mader...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote:
Good question but I'm not developer...
Then how can you know it's simple?
*know* and *simple* are your words
I wrote :
*I
Am 08.08.2013 21:47, schrieb maderios:
Hi
This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs.
export, etc
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows
On 08.08.2013 at 10:00 P.M., Jay Smith wrote:
This is open-source software. You are welcome to become a developer,
fork the project, and do all this yourself or you can build a team to do
it. Or you can hire people to do it for you. But asking the developers
-- all volunteers -- to increase
On 8/8/2013 1:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Hi
This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs.
export, etc
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Hi
This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs. export,
etc
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior
On 08/08/2013 03:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Hi
This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs.
export, etc
Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
- One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
- One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows
14 matches
Mail list logo
