[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199585#comment-13199585
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-136:
+1, much better.
First try.
$ ./bin/giraph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199938#comment-13199938
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-40:
---
By the way Claudio, I think several IDEs have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199935#comment-13199935
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-40:
---
What I meant and am working on, is failing the build
+1.
I'm fine with this.
Avery
On 1/31/12 8:45 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release.
As mentioned above, we're releasing a tag (a specific svn revision).
That is what the release is. Both src .tar.gz and binary files are
courtesies.
A release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13198070#comment-13198070
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-136:
Okay, hopefully that gets addressed at some point
Thanks again for doing the release Jakob. It would be awesome if you
could keep documentation on the steps you are taking so future releases
will be easy.
Avery
On 1/31/12 11:54 AM, jgho...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jghoman
Date: Tue Jan 31 19:54:50 2012
New Revision: 1238775
URL:
To address the issues of binaries, could we release multiple binaries of
Giraph that coincide with the different versions of Hadoop?
On 1/31/12 7:44 PM, David Garcia wrote:
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release. A release
should be something that users can use as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13197650#comment-13197650
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-136:
I can verify the error message is improved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13196727#comment-13196727
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-134:
+1, looks good! Excited for the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13195286#comment-13195286
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-128:
Thanks for taking a look. I forgot to upload
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3596/
---
(Updated 2012-01-28 01:15:26.114994)
Review request for giraph.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3596/
---
(Updated 2012-01-28 03:01:01.809862)
Review request for giraph.
Changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-128:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-128.4.patch
Sorry, I missed the mocking question. Fixed it here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13193579#comment-13193579
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-128:
Anyone want to review? I think this will be very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13192388#comment-13192388
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-130:
It would be great to enforce this checking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-128:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-128.2.patch
Updated after GIRAPH-124 was committed.
RPC port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13192887#comment-13192887
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-129:
As long as mvn compile doesn't build the javadoc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3596/
---
Review request for giraph.
Summary
---
Simple handling of port collisions
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3592/#review4538
---
Ship it!
Looks great! One very minor thing. Before you commit, can
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.1.0
Reporter: Avery Ching
Assignee: Avery Ching
Currently Giraph uses a basic port + the task partition to get the RPC port.
This doesn't work well for when there are multiple Giraph jobs running
simultaneously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13190351#comment-13190351
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-124:
Nice, Claudio. I haven't had a chance to fully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189574#comment-13189574
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-127:
I think this functionality is very useful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13188578#comment-13188578
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-126:
Agree with Jakob. Thanks Andrei, every memory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13188588#comment-13188588
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-126:
Actually, looking at it some more, does this work
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for pinging us. While we don't have a JIRA for Blueprints, we
definitely thought it would be a great idea in the past. Arun Suresh
(arun.sur...@gmail.com) looked into this briefly I believe (cc'ed
here). Hopefully he can give more details.
Avery
On 1/17/12 8:44 AM, Jeff
Claudio,
You are right that vertices are created automatically when messages are
sent to non-existent vertices. But that behavior can be made
application specific. The default resolution of mutations/messages is
VertexResolver. But you are always welcome to implement your own
application
I can't make it, but would be willing to help with slides if necessary.
It would be great if someone could talk about Giraph.
Avery
On 1/11/12 12:26 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
Forwarding Simon's call for Berlin Buzzwords.
Does anybody plan to give a talk about Giraph at Buzzwords? I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13184655#comment-13184655
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-123:
Works for me. Thanks Jakob
The general idea of combiners is to reduce the number of messages sent.
Combiners are purely an optimization and the application should work
correctly without it (since it's never guaranteed to actually be
called). Combiners can only modify the messages sent to a single
vertex, so they can't
The javadoc for VertexCombiner#combine() is
/**
* Combines message values for a particular vertex index.
*
* @param vertexIndex Index of the vertex getting these messages
* @param msgList List of the messages to be combined
* @return Message that is combined from {@link MsgList}
Combiners should be commutative and associative. In my opinion that
means reducing to a single message or none at all. Can you think of a
case when more than 1 message should be returned from a combiner? I
know that returning null isn't preferable in general, but I think that
functionality
Given our changes to Vertex, I think so. +1
Avery
On 1/8/12 8:28 AM, Claudio Martella wrote:
One thing about the VertexResolver. Doesn't it make more sense if the
interface is called VertexResolver and the default basic
implementation is called BasicVertexResolver?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181894#comment-13181894
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-118:
+1, looks good!
Clarify
Hi Claudio, answers inline:
On 1/6/12 8:25 AM, Claudio Martella wrote:
Hello,
I hope somebody can shed some light on a piece of code i'm looking at
while working on GIRAPH-45 (and this code is also the object of
GIRAPH-95, so we'd probably get two birds with one stone here).
The code is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181566#comment-13181566
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-119:
Minor nit
@Override
public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181570#comment-13181570
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-118:
Seems reasonable. Please make sure to update
Thanks Chris. Looks good to me.
Avery
On 1/4/12 6:13 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Guys,
Here's a stub report for Giraph for January 2012:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2012
Please update and add more detail.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3349/
---
(Updated 2012-01-02 18:51:05.007864)
Review request for giraph.
Changes
: Avery Ching
Assignee: Avery Ching
I think this would best for new users as it is much more memory efficient than
Vertex with respect to edges (list vs hash map). We seem to be mostly
iterating over the edges (as several others had pointed out in earlier JIRAs
and emails), so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-115.
Resolution: Fixed
I think work like this will really lower the bar for folks to try out Giraph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-115:
--
Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
Port of the HCC algorithm for identifying all connected
What MutableVertex implementation are you using? Sounds like the issue
only happens during the RPC to send the vertex to another worker. Maybe
a bug in the Writable implementation?
Avery
On 12/23/11 3:14 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
Hmm, the job works if I use a single worker only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-112.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Avery Ching
Thanks for the report and reviews
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-114:
--
Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
Inconsistent message map handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173512#comment-13173512
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-111:
I'm not clear on why this is necessary. Couldn't
Change cast to Vertex used in prepareSuperstep() to BasicVertex
---
Key: GIRAPH-113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-113
Project: Giraph
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-113:
--
Assignee: Avery Ching
Change cast to Vertex used in prepareSuperstep() to BasicVertex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-113:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-113.patch
Change cast to Vertex used in prepareSuperstep() to BasicVertex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3287/
---
Review request for giraph.
Summary
---
As pointed out by YuanYua, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173931#comment-13173931
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-108:
Actually, I'll let Jakob take a first crack
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3255/
---
Review request for giraph.
Summary
---
Added method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-106:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-106.diff
Refactor prepareSuperstep() to make setMessages(IterableM messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-106.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the quick review guys.
Refactor prepareSuperstep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-73:
-
Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
A little refactoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-80:
-
Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
Don't expose the list holding the messages in BasicVertex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171797#comment-13171797
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-73:
---
Most of these changes look good, but I'm not sure I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-107.
Resolution: Duplicate
GIRAPH-106. Something weird happened with JIRA where it was filed 2x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171898#comment-13171898
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-105:
Thanks for the reworking! +1
We should document this somewhere. It is not intuitive as you mention.
Avery
On 12/17/11 1:41 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
A small hint for everyone who wants to run giraph's unit tests on a
pseudo-distributed single node hadoop cluster:
You have to adjust the configuration to allow 4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3203/#review3967
---
Ship it!
+1. Thanks for the changes. I will commit and then open
: Giraph
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Avery Ching
Assignee: Avery Ching
GIRAPH-80 revealed that there is some refactoring to make setMessages()
package-private (prevent users from messing around with internals).
--
This message is automatically generated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170831#comment-13170831
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-93:
---
Argh, since HCatalog is not published to maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170857#comment-13170857
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-57:
---
Emergency fix to allow trunk to compile on certain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching closed GIRAPH-57.
-
Sorry about the error guys.
Add new RPC call (putVertexIdMessagesList) to batch putMsgList
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-103.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Claudio.
Added properties for commonly used package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171073#comment-13171073
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-45:
---
I think that a read messages-by-vertex at a time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171404#comment-13171404
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-45:
---
Ah, thank you for clarifying that. The only minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-57.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Claudio! I just want to note that I added the Apache License header
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-57:
--
Attachment: GIRAPH-57.diff.2
With the final patch (+Apache license header on VertexIdMessages.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170613#comment-13170613
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-45:
---
You might not need the BTree for indexing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170631#comment-13170631
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-93:
---
Just wanted to update that I did get this to work
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3203/#review3936
---
I think that overall this looks pretty nice. I do have a couple of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170651#comment-13170651
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-80:
---
By the way Sebastian, you can run the Hadoop tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170803#comment-13170803
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-103:
No one wants to take a quick look? It's very
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3201/
---
(Updated 2011-12-14 19:50:29.358317)
Review request for giraph.
Changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169756#comment-13169756
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-45:
---
I've been thinking about this a bit more. I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169756#comment-13169756
]
Avery Ching edited comment on GIRAPH-45 at 12/14/11 10:26 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-104:
--
Assignee: Avery Ching
Save half of maximum memory used from messaging
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3175/
---
Review request for giraph.
Summary
---
Currently, the amount of memory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-104:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-104.diff
Save half of maximum memory used from messaging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-57:
-
Assignee: Avery Ching
Provide PutMsgs RPC call
Components: build
Reporter: Avery Ching
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: GIRAPH-103.diff
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-103:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-103.diff
Added properties for commonly used package version to pom.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166430#comment-13166430
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-103:
Also, I updated my affiliation to Facebook
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162929#comment-13162929
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-10:
---
Thanks for the revised diff. I have some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13163050#comment-13163050
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-10:
---
Much improved Claudio.
A couple more minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162640#comment-13162640
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-10:
---
Hi Claudio, great stuff!
A couple of questions.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161031#comment-13161031
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-100:
Anyone? =)
Data input sampling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161219#comment-13161219
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-100:
Sorry Jakob, I'll try to stop doing formatting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161243#comment-13161243
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-100:
Ah, I see. We should file another JIRA to create
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2959/
---
(Updated 2011-12-02 02:55:14.025295)
Review request for giraph.
Changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-100:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-100.2.patch
Moved examples/SuperstepHashPartitionerFactory.java to
integration
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2959/
---
Review request for giraph.
Summary
---
Got rid of ZooKeeper message for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching updated GIRAPH-100:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-100.patch
Duplicate of reviewboard patch (https://reviews.apache.org/r/2959/diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching reassigned GIRAPH-100:
--
Assignee: Avery Ching
Data input sampling and testing improvements
: Avery Ching
Priority: Minor
Munge is a hacky way of support multiple versions of Hadoop. The shim layers
in Pig and Hive are a cleaner way to do this I think. That being said, since
it does work now, it's not a huge priority I guess.
--
This message is automatically generated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155334#comment-13155334
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-99:
---
Thanks Kohei, glad to see you working on Giraph
Thanks for volunteering Claudio! It's very nice that Apache Giraph was
mentioned in the invite, even though it's a relatively new open-source
project. I'll read your draft and send you feedback privately sometime
today. Also, if you need slides, please feel free to use anything I've
ever
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153927#comment-13153927
]
Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-84:
---
Claudio, once a committer +1's something they can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avery Ching resolved GIRAPH-91.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the quick review Claudio. Hudson +1'ed it as well, resolving
101 - 200 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
