+1 for the source release from me.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign.
+1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release.
--
Hyunsik Choi
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM,
+1 (non binding). I downloaded, compiled and ran a couple of
algorithms and the total set of 58 tests successfully.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for the source release from me.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org
+1, I tested it on hadoop 1.0 and it passes tests.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Harsh J ha...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 (non binding). I downloaded, compiled and ran a couple of
algorithms and the total set of 58 tests successfully.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jake Mannix
Woohoo. Vote passes:
PPMC +1s x 4: Avery, Hyunsik, Jake, Claudio
Mentors +1s x 1: Owen
Peanut gallery +1s x 1: Harsh
Hadoop versions tested (not technically part of vote, but nice to
know): 20.2, 1.0 and FB Distro.
Will start a new vote on Incubator for their OK.
Thanks, everybody.
+1.
I'm fine with this.
Avery
On 1/31/12 8:45 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release.
As mentioned above, we're releasing a tag (a specific svn revision).
That is what the release is. Both src .tar.gz and binary files are
courtesies.
A release
Are you +1ing the release, or just the idea of having a source release
in general?
The vote ends tomorrow, so it would be great if the committers and
mentors could take a look...
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Avery Ching ach...@apache.org wrote:
+1.
I'm fine with this.
Avery
On 1/31/12
I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign.
+1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release.
--
Hyunsik Choi
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Giraphers-
I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source
Hi Jakob,
NP, I'll take a look tomorrow.
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 2, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
Are you +1ing the release, or just the idea of having a source release
in general?
The vote ends tomorrow, so it would be great if the committers and
mentors could take a look...
On
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release. A release
should be something that users can use as a dependency. . .like a maven
coordinate. I think you guys should wait until you have made these
decisions. . .and then cut a binary.
On 1/31/12 5:36 PM, Jakob Homan
To address the issues of binaries, could we release multiple binaries of
Giraph that coincide with the different versions of Hadoop?
On 1/31/12 7:44 PM, David Garcia wrote:
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release. A release
should be something that users can use as a
I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release.
As mentioned above, we're releasing a tag (a specific svn revision).
That is what the release is. Both src .tar.gz and binary files are
courtesies.
A release should be something that users can use as a dependency. . .like a
maven
11 matches
Mail list logo
