Hi!
Thanks for your fixups. I'm currently integrating them in a new series.
On what platform did you find that problems?
Tried to reproduce them on 64bit Linux. Anyways the fixes look very reasonable.
Florian
On Thursday 23 August 2012 18:55:39 Ramsay Jones wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
On 26/08/12 10:57, Iain Paton wrote:
If %{THE_REQUEST} =~ /git-receive-pack/
I've just discovered that the If .. directive only appears in apache 2.4
so something more generic will probably be a better idea. Not everyone will
be running 2.4.x for a while yet.
Iain
--
To unsubscribe
On 08/26/2012 07:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:10:29AM +0200, mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
Use the names (nr_heads, heads) consistently across functions, instead
of sometimes naming the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Using one name is better, but I wonder heads is the better one
between the two.
After all, this codepath is not limited to branches these days as
the word head implies. Rather, nr_thing, thing has what we
asked for,
On 08/25, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:134529-6925-3-git-send-email-t.gumme...@gmail.com...
[...]
+ usleep(10*1000);
usleep() is not available to anybody, e.g. it is not in HP NonStop (not in
every case at least)
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
乙酸鋰 ch3co...@gmail.com writes:
git checkout -t -B origin/abcde
works
but
git checkout -B -t origin/abcde
does not.
Could you document the order of parameters or fix the behaviour?
It is crystal clear that
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 06:13:41AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
No problem. I'll probably be a day or two on the patches, as the http
tests are in need of some refactoring before adding more tests. But in
the meantime, I think your config change is a sane work-around.
OK, here is the series. For
In most of our tests, we put repos to be accessed by dumb
protocols in /dumb, and repos to be accessed by smart
protocols in /smart. In our test apache setup, the whole
/auth hierarchy requires authentication. However, we don't
bother to split it by smart and dumb here because we are not
Our test apache config points all of auth/ directly to the
on-disk repositories via an Alias directive. This works fine
because everything authenticated is currently in auth/dumb,
which is a subset. However, this would conflict with a
ScriptAlias for auth/smart (which will come in future
We do not currently test authentication for smart-http repos
at all. Part of the infrastructure to do this is recognizing
that auth/smart is indeed a smart-http repo.
The current apache config recognizes only ^/smart/* as
smart-http. Let's instead treat anything with /smart/ in the
URL as
We do not currently test authentication over smart-http at
all. In theory, it should work exactly as it does for dumb
http (which we do test). It does indeed work for these
simple tests, but this patch lays the groundwork for more
complex tests in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King
Some sites set up http access to repositories such that
fetching is anonymous and unauthenticated, but pushing is
authenticated. While there are multiple ways to do this, the
technique advertised in the git-http-backend manpage is to
block access to locations matching /git-receive-pack$.
Let's
Most of our http requests go through the http_request()
interface, which does some nice post-processing on the
results. In particular, it handles prompting for missing
credentials as well as approving and rejecting valid or
invalid credentials. Unfortunately, it only handles GET
requests. Making
All of the smart-http GET requests go through the http_get_*
functions, which will prompt for credentials and retry if we
see an HTTP 401.
POST requests, however, do not go through any central point.
Moreover, it is difficult to retry in the general case; we
cannot assume the request body fits in
On Aug 27, 2012, at 04:28 , Iain Paton wrote:
On 26/08/12 10:57, Iain Paton wrote:
If %{THE_REQUEST} =~ /git-receive-pack/
I've just discovered that the If .. directive only appears in apache 2.4
so something more generic will probably be a better idea. Not everyone will
be
Hi,
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/27/2012 05:32 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
What is the purpose?
.git/ is a folder...
--
RMA.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 27 August 2012 15:35, Mihamina Rakotomandimby miham...@rktmb.org wrote:
On 08/27/2012 05:32 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
What is the purpose?
.git/ is a folder...
I realize that but I wanted to distribute it as a downloadable file
On 27 August 2012 15:45, Dan Johnson computerdr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
You're probably looking for the git bundle command (see git bundle
--help),
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:32:40 +0100
Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
Depends on what you really need.
If you need to export the repository *history* of one or more
references (branches or tags), use `git bundle` to create a
Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com writes:
I realize that but I wanted to distribute it as a downloadable file
without having to use a server.
git bundle can create a single file from the object database.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7
On 08/27/2012 04:45 PM, Dan Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ?
You're probably looking for the git bundle command (see git bundle
--help), but it's possible you
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
Some testcases will fail if current work directory is on a symlink.
symlink$ sh ./t4035-diff-quiet.sh
$ sh ./t4035-diff-quiet.sh --root=/symlink
$ TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY=/symlink sh ./t4035-diff-quiet.sh
This is because the realpath of
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
And the last one should really be a longer term item. It is more
important for its codebase to get mature and robust, and that can
only happen by various projects and products (e.g. GitHub for Mac)
using it to improve it. I do not think subtree (or
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:
bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 08/26/2012 07:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
After all, this codepath is not limited to branches these days as
the word head implies. Rather, nr_thing, thing has what we
asked for, and refs has what the other sides have, and we are
trying
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Yeah, I agree that refnames would be better. I think something like
spec or refspec would indicate better that they are to be matched
against, but then you run afoul of confusing that with colon-delimited
refspecs (which I do not think fetch-pack understands at
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
乙酸鋰 ch3co...@gmail.com writes:
git checkout -t -B origin/abcde
works
but
git checkout -B -t origin/abcde
does not.
Could you document the order of parameters or fix
d...@cray.com writes:
I am hoping to move git-subtree into core once it performs a little
better and I've fixed a couple of bugs. Will basing it on libgit2 delay
that process significantly? Six months delay is no problem. 2 years
would be problematic.
I would be happy to be a guinea pig
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
(+cc: Shawn)
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 06:13:41AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
No problem. I'll probably be a day or two on the patches, as the http
tests are in need of some refactoring before adding more tests. But in
the meantime, I think your config change is a
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Most of the time, this is not a big deal; for both fetching
and pushing, we make a GET request before doing any POSTs,
so typically we figure out the credentials during the first
request, then reuse them during the POST. However, some
servers may allow a
c...@elego.de (Carlos Martín Nieto) writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de writes:
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index e9019ac..93e5d6e 100755
--- a/t/t3200-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t3200-branch.sh
@@ -383,6 +383,22 @@
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
c...@elego.de (Carlos Martín Nieto) writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de writes:
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index e9019ac..93e5d6e 100755
--- a/t/t3200-branch.sh
+++
I have a note attached to a commit, but the text of the note isn't
treated as part of the commit for the purposes of grep. For example:
mkdir /tmp/foo
cd /tmp/foo
git init
git commit --allow-empty -m 'Blank commit.'
git notes add -m 'Find me!'
git log --show-notes
Hello Tad,
we maintain a central/main git repository which our developers clone
from. We want to synchronize this central git repository with
Subversion. I know this is not the recommended way to do this, but this
was the choice that was made. The central git repository was originally
cloned
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance there given feedback.
I expect it will take some time for libgit2 to
Todd A. Jacobs nospam+listm...@codegnome.org writes:
What is the right way to include notes in log searches, especially if
the end goal is to find the related commit ID?
You can git grep on refs/notes/commits and s,/,,g on the file name
found.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
Currently using git rm on a submodule - populated or not - fails with
this error:
fatal: git rm: 'submodule path': Is a directory
This made sense in the past as there was no way to remove a submodule
without possibly removing unpushed parts of the submodule's history
contained in its .git
d...@cray.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance there given feedback.
I expect it will take
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rm.txt b/Documentation/git-rm.txt
index 5d31860..3c76f9c 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rm.txt
@@ -107,6 +107,21 @@ as well as modifications of existing paths.
Typically you would first
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Well that's a chicken-and-egg problem, isn't it. How will a library
become widespread unless something uses it?
That something will not be the git core itself. Otherwise we will
lose a stable reference implementation to catch its bugs.
Well, the
2012/8/28 Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com:
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:
bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation
and been broken under
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
c...@elego.de (Carlos Martín Nieto) writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de writes:
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index e9019ac..93e5d6e
The 27/08/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
d...@cray.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:48:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Most of the time, this is not a big deal; for both fetching
and pushing, we make a GET request before doing any POSTs,
so typically we figure out the credentials during the first
request,
hi,
Junio C Hamano gitster at pobox.com writes:
The alternates mechanism [...]
sorry for the somewhat late response - i found this thread only now.
at qt-project.org we have a somewhat peculiar setup: we have the qt4 repository,
and a bunch of qt5 repositories which resulted from a split. qt5
Use a i18n-specific test_i18ncmp in t/t0006-date.sh for relative dates
tests. This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-230-g7d29a:
7d29a i18n: mark relative dates for translation
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-apply.
This issue was was introduced in the following commits:
de373 i18n: apply: mark parseopt strings for translation
3638e i18n: apply: mark strings for translation
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for pack-object.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10.2-556-g46140:
46140 index-pack: use streaming interface for collision test on large blobs
cf2ba pack-objects: use streaming interface for reading large loose blobs
and been broken
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote, and
bypass some testcases using C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prereq flag. This issue
was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:
bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for parseopt tests.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10.1-488-g54e6d:
54e6d i18n: parseopt: lookup help and argument translations when showing
usage
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 7:38 PM
乙酸鋰 ch3co...@gmail.com writes:
git checkout -t -B origin/abcde
works
but
git checkout -B -t origin/abcde
does not.
Could you document the order of parameters or fix the behaviour?
It is crystal clear that
This is a follow-up to $gmane/204149; somehow the discussion petered
out, but I think this topic (and also tag --contains that was not
really discussed) needs to be looked into. Here is a first baby
step.
- The first one is an obvious simplification; we never supported
more than one
In early days of its life, I planned to make it possible to compute
is a commit contained in all of these other commits? with this
function, but it turned out that no caller needed it.
Just make it take two commit objects and add a comment to say what
these two functions do.
Signed-off-by: Junio
The original computed merge-base between the old commit and the new
commit and checked if the old commit was a merge base between them,
in order to make sure we are fast-forwarding.
Instead, call in_merge_bases(old, new) which does the same.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
---
The function get_merge_bases() needs to postprocess the result from
merge_bases_many() in order to make sure none of the commit is a
true ancestor of another commit, which is expensive. However, when
checking if a commit is an ancestor of another commit, we only need
to see if the commit is a
The original computed merge-base between HEAD and the remote ref and
checked if the remote ref is a merge base between them, in order to
make sure that we are fast-forwarding.
Instead, call in_merge_bases(remote, HEAD) which does the same.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
---
After merge_bases_many() paints the graph in two colors to find
common ancestors, get_merge_bases_many() reduces the result by
excluding commits that can be reached from other commits in the
result. We used to do N * (N-1) traversals for this, but we can
check if one commit is reachable from any
Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org writes:
I searched for all occurrences of '[[' which would indicate a double
optional argument within the synopsis and only found git-read-tree.
Double-optional? That is not an issue.
If an option always takes a parameter, we would have
git cmd
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
A silly question. Does the initial GET request when we push look
any different from the initial GET request when we fetch? Can we
make them look different in an updated client, so that the server
side can say this GET is about pushing into us, and we require
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
for (i = 0; i cnt; i++) {
- if (rslt[i])
+ /*
+ * Is rslt[i] an ancestor of any of the others?
+ * then it is not interesting to us.
+ */
+ for (j = 0; j i; j++)
+
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
diff --git i/commit.c w/commit.c
index 65a8485..70427ab 100644
--- i/commit.c
+++ w/commit.c
@@ -837,10 +837,13 @@ int in_merge_bases(struct commit *commit, struct commit
**reference, int num)
struct commit_list *bases, *b;
int ret =
If the new branch name to -b/-B happens to be missing, the next
argument may be mistaken as branch name and no longer recognized by
checkout as argument. This may lead to confusing error messages.
By checking branch name early and printing out the invalid name, users
may realize they forgot to
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
If the new branch name to -b/-B happens to be missing, the next
argument may be mistaken as branch name and no longer recognized by
checkout as argument. This may lead to confusing error messages.
By checking branch name early and printing out
64 matches
Mail list logo
