Re: [msysGit] [PATCH 07/14] Fix BASIC_LDFLAGS and COMPAT_CFLAGS for 64bit MinGW-w64

2014-10-14 Thread Marat Radchenko
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:22:19PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Marat Radchenko wrote: +CC_MACH := $(shell sh -c '$(CC) -dumpmachine 2/dev/null || echo not') There is a rather huge problem with that. The latest mingw-w64 release, 4.9.1, does not do what you

Re: [PATCH 0/3] -x tracing option for tests

2014-10-14 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 10/13/2014 11:07 PM, Jeff King wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: [...] Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor

2014-10-14 Thread Jakub Narębski
brian m. carlson wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:41:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes: The second two patches implement some basic support for building with Asciidoctor. The first of these moves some items into variables due to some

[PATCH] [kernel] completion: silence fatal: Not a git repository error

2014-10-14 Thread John Szakmeister
It is possible that a user is trying to run a git command and fail to realize that they are not in a git repository or working tree. When trying to complete an operation, __git_refs would fall to a degenerate case and attempt to use git for-each-ref, which would emit the error. Let's fix this by

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor

2014-10-14 Thread brian m. carlson
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:07:51PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: brian m. carlson wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:41:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: What I do not understand is that 3/4 lets you drop inclusion of asciidoc.conf which contains a lot more than just linkgit: definition.

Re: [PATCH] Initialise hash variable to prevent compiler warnings

2014-10-14 Thread Felipe Franciosi
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Felipe Franciosi fel...@paradoxo.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: FNV/I/IDIV10/0 covers all the possibilities of (method 3), I would

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Max Kirillov m...@max630.net wrote: These are fixes of issues with submodules with use of multiple working trees. I think the patches look fine from the nd/multiple-work-trees writer's perspective. I know too little about submodules to judge if this is the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] -x tracing option for tests

2014-10-14 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:52:30AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to have them in the 2.2 release. Yes,

Re: [RFC/PATCH] fsck: do not canonicalize modes in trees we are checking

2014-10-14 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:37:27AM +1100, Ben Aveling wrote: A question about fsck - is there a reason it doesn't have an option to delete bad objects? If the objects are reachable, then deleting them would create other big problems (i.e., we would be breaking the object graph!). If they are

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor

2014-10-14 Thread Jeff King
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: This series is designed to implement the changes necessary to build Git using Asciidoctor instead of AsciiDoc. Thanks. I had always taken the attitude that we wrote for the original Python AsciiDoc, and that using AsciiDoctor

Re: [PATCH] [kernel] completion: silence fatal: Not a git repository error

2014-10-14 Thread John Szakmeister
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:49 AM, John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net wrote: It is possible that a user is trying to run a git command and fail to realize that they are not in a git repository or working tree. When trying to complete an operation, __git_refs would fall to a degenerate case

Re: [PATCH] receive-pack: plug minor memory leak in unpack()

2014-10-14 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:08:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: I wonder if run-command should provide a managed env array similar to the args array. I took a look at a few of them: I took a brief look, too. I had hoped we could just all it env and everybody would be happy using it

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove spurious 'no threads support' warnings

2014-10-14 Thread Etienne Buira
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Etienne Buira etienne.bu...@gmail.com writes: Threads count being defaulted to 0 (autodetect), and --disable-pthreads build checking that thread count==1, there were spurious warnings about threads being ignored, despite

Re: [PATCH v4] Handle atexit list internaly for unthreaded builds

2014-10-14 Thread Etienne Buira
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Etienne Buira etienne.bu...@gmail.com writes: Wrap atexit()s calls on unthreaded builds to handle callback list internally. This is needed because on unthreaded builds, asyncs inherits parent's atexit() list, that

Re: [PATCH] Initialise hash variable to prevent compiler warnings

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Felipe Franciosi fel...@paradoxo.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: If I really had to choose between the two, adding a useless initialization would be the less harmful choice. Adding a meaningless default: robs

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: Specifically I'm not excited about getting into a state where we have to maintain both an asciidoc.conf file _and_ ruby extensions for asciidoctor. I don't mind if somebody wants to step up and

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 14.10.2014 um 14:17 schrieb Duy Nguyen: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Max Kirillov m...@max630.net wrote: These are fixes of issues with submodules with use of multiple working trees. I think the patches look fine from the nd/multiple-work-trees writer's perspective. I know too little

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes: But I can't see how that can work by just sharing the modules directory tree, as that contains work tree related files - e.g. the index - for each submodule. AFAICS sharing them between work trees will work only if the content of the modules directory

[PATCH] pass config slots as pointers instead of offsets

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
From: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:16:57 -0400 Many config-parsing helpers, like parse_branch_color_slot, take the name of a config variable and an offset to the slot name (e.g., color.branch.plain is passed along with 13 to effectively pass plain). This is leftover

Re: [PATCH] pass config slots as pointers instead of offsets

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Junio C Hamano wrote: builtin/branch.c | 16 builtin/commit.c | 19 +-- builtin/log.c| 2 +- log-tree.c | 4 ++-- log-tree.h | 2 +- 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com --

Re: [PATCH] [kernel] completion: silence fatal: Not a git repository error

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes: It is possible that a user is trying to run a git command and fail to realize that they are not in a git repository or working tree. When trying to complete an operation, __git_refs would fall to a degenerate case and attempt to use git

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Max Kirillov
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:26:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: And multiple-worktree _is_ about keeping the same repository and history data (i.e. object database, refs, rerere database, reflogs for refs/*) only once, while allowing multiple working trees attached to that single copy. So

Re: [PATCH] git-prompt.sh: Hide prompt for ignored pwd

2014-10-14 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 14.10.2014 um 04:32 schrieb Jess Austin: diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh index c5473dc..d7559ff 100644 --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ # GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS to a

Re: [PATCH] git-prompt.sh: Hide prompt for ignored pwd

2014-10-14 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-10-14 14:47, Johannes Sixt wrote: Am 14.10.2014 um 04:32 schrieb Jess Austin: diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh index c5473dc..d7559ff 100644 --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh @@ -84,6 +84,11

Re: [PATCH] [kernel] completion: silence fatal: Not a git repository error

2014-10-14 Thread John Szakmeister
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes: It is possible that a user is trying to run a git command and fail to realize that they are not in a git repository or working tree. When trying to complete an operation,

Re: [PATCH] git-prompt.sh: Hide prompt for ignored pwd

2014-10-14 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-10-13 22:32, Jess Austin wrote: Set __git_ps1 to display nothing when present working directory is ignored, triggered by either the new environmental variable GIT_PS1_HIDE_ON_IGNORED_PWD or the new repository configuration variable bash.hideOnIgnoredPwd (or both). In the absence of

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 14.10.2014 um 20:34 schrieb Max Kirillov: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:26:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: And multiple-worktree _is_ about keeping the same repository and history data (i.e. object database, refs, rerere database, reflogs for refs/*) only once, while allowing multiple working

[PATCH] clone: --dissociate option to mark that reference is only temporary

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
While use of the --reference option to borrow objects from an existing local repository of the same project is an effective way to reduce traffic when cloning a project over the network, it makes the resulting borrowing repository dependent on the borrowed repository. After running git

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Max Kirillov
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:09:45PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: Until that problem is solved it looks wrong to pass GIT_COMMON_DIR into submodule recursion, I believe GIT_COMMON_DIR should be added to the local_repo_env array (and even if it is passed on later, we might have to append

Re: [PATCH] [kernel] completion: silence fatal: Not a git repository error

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: ... Hmph, do you mean this one? $ cd /var/tmp ;# not a git repository $ git checkout TAB - $ git checkout fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent

[PATCH] checkout: report upstream correctly even with loosely defined branch.*.merge

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
When checking out a branch that is set to build on top of another branch (often, a remote-tracking branch), git checkout reports how your work relates to the other branch, e.g. Your branch is behind 'origin/master', and can be fast-forwarded. Back when this feature was introduced, this was

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

2014-10-14 Thread Max Kirillov
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:51:22PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: Am 14.10.2014 um 20:34 schrieb Max Kirillov: But here are a lot of nuances. For example, it makes sense to have a superproject checkout without submodules being initialized (so that they don't waste space and machine time for

What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2014, #03; Tue, 14)

2014-10-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. You can find the changes described here in the integration branches of the repositories listed at

color box, display box, corrugated box, color card, blister card, color sleeve, hang tag, label

2014-10-14 Thread Jinghao Printing - CHINA
Hi, this is David Wu from Shanghai, China. We are a printing company, we can print color box, corrugated box, label, hang tag etc. Please let me know if you need these. I will send you the website then. Best regards, David Wu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the

[PATCH v23 0/25] rs/ref-transaction (Use ref transactions, part 3)

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
This series by Ronnie was last seen on-list at [1]. It includes some improvements to the ref-transaction API, improves handling of poorly named refs (which should make it easier to tighten the refname format checks in the future), and is a stepping stone toward later series that use the

[PATCH 01/25] mv test: recreate mod/ directory instead of relying on stale copy

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:01:46 -0700 The tests for 'git mv moves a submodule' functionality often run commands like git mv sub mod/sub to move a submodule into a subdirectory. Just like plain /bin/mv, this is supposed to succeed if the mod/

[PATCH 02/25] wrapper.c: remove/unlink_or_warn: simplify, treat ENOENT as success

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:01:18 -0700 Simplify the function warn_if_unremovable slightly. Additionally, change behaviour slightly. If we failed to remove the object because the object does not exist, we can still return success back to the caller since

[PATCH 03/25] refs.c: lock_ref_sha1_basic is used for all refs

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:59:02 -0700 lock_ref_sha1_basic is used to lock refs that sit directly in the .git dir such as HEAD and MERGE_HEAD in addition to the more ordinary refs under refs/. Remove the note claiming otherwise. Signed-off-by: Ronnie

[PATCH 04/25] wrapper.c: add a new function unlink_or_msg

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:20:36 -0700 This behaves like unlink_or_warn except that on failure it writes the message to its 'err' argument, which the caller can display in an appropriate way or ignore. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com

[PATCH 05/25] refs.c: add an err argument to delete_ref_loose

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:25:23 -0700 Add an err argument to delete_ref_loose so that we can pass a descriptive error string back to the caller. Pass the err argument from transaction commit to this function so that transaction users will have a nice

[PATCH 06/25] refs.c: pass the ref log message to _create/delete/update instead of _commit

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:22:42 -0700 Change the ref transaction API so that we pass the reflog message to the create/delete/update functions instead of to ref_transaction_commit. This allows different reflog messages for each ref update in a multi-ref

[PATCH 07/25] rename_ref: don't ask read_ref_full where the ref came from

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:41:04 -0700 We call read_ref_full with a pointer to flags from rename_ref but since we never actually use the returned flags we can just pass NULL here instead. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Reviewed-by:

[PATCH 09/25] refs.c: call lock_ref_sha1_basic directly from commit

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 10:43:39 -0700 Skip using the lock_any_ref_for_update wrapper and call lock_ref_sha1_basic directly from the commit function. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu

[PATCH 08/25] refs.c: refuse to lock badly named refs in lock_ref_sha1_basic

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 10:40:10 -0700 Move the check for check_refname_format from lock_any_ref_for_update to lock_ref_sha1_basic. At some later stage we will get rid of lock_any_ref_for_update completely. This has no visible impact to callers except for

[PATCH 10/25] refs.c: pass a list of names to skip to is_refname_available

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:16:07 -0700 Change is_refname_available to take a list of strings to exclude when checking for conflicts instead of just one single name. We can already exclude a single name for the sake of renames. This generalizes that support.

[PATCH 11/25] refs.c: ref_transaction_commit: distinguish name conflicts from other errors

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:14:38 -0700 In _commit, ENOTDIR can happen in the call to lock_ref_sha1_basic, either when we lstat the new refname or if the name checking function reports that the same type of conflict happened. In both cases, it means that

[PATCH 12/25] fetch.c: change s_update_ref to use a ref transaction

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:49:07 -0700 Change s_update_ref to use a ref transaction for the ref update. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com --- builtin/fetch.c | 34

[PATCH 13/25] refs.c: make write_ref_sha1 static

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:36:58 -0700 No external users call write_ref_sha1 any more so let's declare it static. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com --- refs.c | 10 -- refs.h | 3

[PATCH 14/25] refs.c: change resolve_ref_unsafe reading argument to be a flags field

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:59:36 -0700 resolve_ref_unsafe takes a boolean argument for reading (a nonexistent ref resolves successfully for writing but not for reading). Change this to be a flags field instead, and pass the new constant

[PATCH 16/25] branch -d: avoid repeated symref resolution

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:22:48 -0700 If a repository gets in a broken state with too much symref nesting, it cannot be repaired with git branch -d: $ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/nonsense refs/heads/nonsense $ git branch -d nonsense error: branch 'nonsense' not found. Worse, git update-ref

[PATCH 15/25] reflog test: test interaction with detached HEAD

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:52:25 -0700 A proposed patch produced broken HEAD reflog entries when checking out anything other than a branch. The testsuite still passed, so it took a few days for the bug to be noticed. Add tests checking the content of the

[PATCH 18/25] packed-ref cache: forbid dot-components in refnames

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:22:22 -0700 Since v1.7.9-rc1~10^2 (write_head_info(): handle extra refs locally, 2012-01-06), this trick to keep track of .have refs that are only valid on the wire and not on the filesystem is not needed any more. Simplify by removing support for the

[PATCH 17/25] branch -d: simplify by using RESOLVE_REF_READING

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:34:36 -0700 When git branch -d reads the branch it is about to delete, it used to avoid passing the RESOLVE_REF_READING ('treat missing ref as error') flag because a symref pointing to a nonexistent ref would show up as missing

[PATCH 19/25] test: put tests for handling of bad ref names in one place

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:02:39 -0700 There's no straightforward way to grep for all tests dealing with invalid refs. Put them in a single test script so it is easy to see what functionality has not been exercised with bad ref names yet. Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 20/25] refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named refs

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:45:43 -0700 We currently do not handle badly named refs well: $ cp .git/refs/heads/master .git/refs/heads/master.@\*@\\. $ git branch fatal: Reference has invalid format: 'refs/heads/master.@*@\.' $ git branch

[PATCH 22/25] remote rm/prune: print a message when writing packed-refs fails

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:42:57 -0700 Until v2.1.0-rc0~22^2~11 (refs.c: add an err argument to repack_without_refs, 2014-06-20), repack_without_refs forgot to provide an error message when commit_packed_refs fails. Even today, it only provides a message

[PATCH 23/25] refs.c: do not permit err == NULL

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:42:37 -0700 Some functions that take a strbuf argument to append an error treat !err as an indication that the message should be suppressed (e.g., ref_update_reject_duplicates). Others write the message to stderr on !err (e.g., repack_without_refs). Others crash (e.g.,

[PATCH 21/25] for-each-ref: skip and warn about broken ref names

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
From: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:35:17 -0700 Print a warning message for any bad ref names we find in the repo and skip them so callers don't have to deal with parsing them. It might be useful in the future to have a flag where we would not skip these refs for

[PATCH 25/25] ref_transaction_commit: bail out on failure to remove a ref

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:01:35 -0700 When removal of a loose or packed ref fails, bail out instead of trying to finish the transaction. This way, a single error message can be printed (instead of multiple messages being concatenated by mistake) and the operator can try to solve the underlying

[PATCH 24/25] lockfile: remove unable_to_lock_error

2014-10-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:41:34 -0700 The former caller uses unable_to_lock_message now. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com --- lockfile.c | 10 -- lockfile.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git

meld output check is broken

2014-10-14 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Hello, It seems that support of --output by meld is performed by grepping its help output. However with meld 3.12 I get $ meld --help Usage: meld [OPTION...] Help Options: -h, --help Show help options --help-all Show all help options --help-gtk

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor

2014-10-14 Thread brian m. carlson
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:08:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: Specifically I'm not excited about getting into a state where we have to maintain both an asciidoc.conf file _and_ ruby

Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Use absolute paths of lockfiles

2014-10-14 Thread Yue Lin Ho
Hi Michael: Good Morning. :) I see mh/lockfile and mh/lockfile-stdio were ​graduated to master. So. does this patch continue? On top of mh/lockfile-stdio? Thank you. ^_^ Yue Lin Ho -- View this message in context:

[PATCH] git-prompt.sh: Option to hide prompt for ignored pwd

2014-10-14 Thread Jess Austin
Optionally set __git_ps1 to display nothing when present working directory is ignored, triggered by the new environmental variable GIT_PS1_HIDE_IF_PWD_IGNORED. This environmental variable may be overridden on any repository by setting bash.hideIfPwdIgnored to false. In the absence of

Expected bug with reset --hard

2014-10-14 Thread Nicholas Chmielewski
git version 1.9.1 version 2.1.2 I had some changes in a tracked file that I wanted to discard. Instead of using checkout, I instead used `git reset --hard HEAD` to reset. Git returned the message `HEAD is now at sha commit-message` I then went `git status` and it showed me that I still have

Re: Expected bug with reset --hard

2014-10-14 Thread Nicholas Chmielewski
I'd like to rescind my bug report. A bit more further investigation revealed that git was detecting the file with changes as jquery.datatables.js but the file in my directory was reported as being named jquery.dataTables.js . I'm currently working on OS X 10.9, and this issue is probably