Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
---
po/de.po | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index 65a8ac0..6af1599 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -3559,21 +3559,21 @@ msgid
Warning: you are leaving %d commit behind, not
This message is about leaving orphaned commits behind, not about
behing behind an upstream branch. Try to make this clear.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
---
po/de.po | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index
[Adding Junio's correct email address. Sigh.]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in
our buildsystem with:
+ '[' '!' -f /builddir/build/SOURCES/patch-3.19-rc6.xz ']'
+ case
The conclusions from the last time we discussed this [*1*], the last
word was that
git push $some_opt... --repo=$Repo $more_opt... $args...
is designed to work exactly like
git push $some_opt... $more_opt... $Repo $args...
and the documentation that says otherwise is incorrect.
On 15-01-06 12:51 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote:
The first patch simply changes the title from gitk: dir to dir - gitk,
which is the title layout used by most of the applications on my Kubuntu box.
The second patch is the one that I'm more keen to see accepted. It relies
on the first only in
If an --author argument is specified but does not contain a '' then git tries
to find the argument within the existing authors; and gives the error
message No existing author found with '%s' if there is no match.
This is confusing for users who try to specify a valid complete author
name.
Rename
Hi,
I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in
our buildsystem with:
+ '[' '!' -f /builddir/build/SOURCES/patch-3.19-rc6.xz ']'
+ case $patch in
+ unxz
+ patch -p1 -F1 -s
symbolic link target '../../../../../include/dt-bindings' is invalid
error: Bad exit status from
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
yeah that's the goal. Though as we're in one transaction, as soon
as we have an early exit, the
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
- die(_(No existing author found with '%s'), name);
+ die(_(--author '%s': neither 'Name email' nor a match for an
existing author), name);
I had to add to the bikeshed, but I had to read this several times to
make
'git add' supports not only `add.ignoreErrors`, but also `add.ignore-errors`
configuration variable.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/git-add.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-add.txt
2015-01-26 16:34 GMT+01:00 Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net:
This message is about leaving orphaned commits behind, not about
behing behind an upstream branch. Try to make this clear.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
Thanks for both patches!
--
To
Several files in Documentation have an unstable 'Last updated' timestamp. The
reason is that their mtime changes every time, which prevents reproducible
builds.
341 technical/api-index.txt: technical/api-index-skel.txt \
342 technical/api-index.sh $(patsubst %,%.txt,$(API_DOCS))
343
ALL_LIBFILES uses wildcard, which provides the result in directory
order. This order depends on the underlying filesystem on the
buildhost. To get reproducible builds it is required to sort such list
before using them.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de
---
git-gui/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file
From: Benedikt Heine b...@bebehei.de
Signed-off-by: Benedikt Heine b...@bebehei.de
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index b2d4639..596f486 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Or did I miss a way that git-apply can take a git patch and apply it
to a tree that isn't a git repo?
Exactly. git apply works as
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org writes:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in
our buildsystem with:
+ '[' '!' -f /builddir/build/SOURCES/patch-3.19-rc6.xz ']'
+ case
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
What is your take on CVE-2015-1196, which brought this /regression/ to
GNU patch?
If git apply get /fixed/ for that same CVE, would that /break/ your fix?
I _think_ we allow arbitrary symlinks to be created, but then we
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kuleshov
kuleshovm...@gmail.com wrote:
'git add' supports not only `add.ignoreErrors`, but also `add.ignore-errors`
configuration variable.
See 6b3020a2 (add: introduce add.ignoreerrors synonym for
add.ignore-errors, 2010-12-01) for why this patch is
write_ref_sha1 now either returns 0 for a successful write or !=0 if an
error occurred. This cleanup results in cleaning the code at other places
as well where we had to set force_write to make the write_ref_sha1(...)
|| commit_ref(...) combination work. Also the checks for the optimisation
of old
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Or did I miss a way that git-apply can take a git patch and apply it
to a tree that isn't a git repo?
Exactly. git apply works as a straight patch replacement outside
of a git repository. It doesn't actually need a
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in
our buildsystem with:
+ '[' '!' -f
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Or did I miss a way that git-apply can take a git patch and apply it
to a tree that isn't a git repo?
Exactly. git apply works as
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
I do not see the problem in the code itself, but rather in understanding
the code. I will send a follow up patch which makes it easier to follow
by removing the early exit with no problem away.
Taken as a whole the code may function correctly but the
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie alexhenri...@gmail.com
---
gitk-git/po/ca.po | 1349 +
1 file changed, 1349 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gitk-git/po/ca.po
diff --git a/gitk-git/po/ca.po b/gitk-git/po/ca.po
new file mode 100644
index
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org writes:
Ugh. I don't see anything we can do about this on the git side, and I
do kind of understand why 'patch' would be worried about '..' files.
In a perfect world, patch would parse the filename and see that it
stays within the directory
Erik Faye-Lund kusmab...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Exactly. I am happy to submit a patch, but I cannot think of any
mechanisms besides:
1. Calling `id`, which I suspect is very not portable.
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
... I somehow had trouble making
sense of Z (a match...) as a noun.
I wonder if adding back in the missing verb, rather than a colon, would
also make more sense:
--author '%s' is neither 'Name email' nor a match for an existing author
Then
--author
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
I can redo the atomic-push-fix series with this cleanup merged
into the appropriate patches or you could just queue it on top
of said series.
Yeah, I do not think we are expecting to fast track these two series
through 'next' to 'master'
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Exactly. I am happy to submit a patch, but I cannot think of any
mechanisms besides:
1. Calling `id`, which I suspect is very not portable.
2. Writing a C program to check getuid().
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:43:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
... I somehow had trouble making
sense of Z (a match...) as a noun.
I wonder if adding back in the missing verb, rather than a colon, would
also make more sense:
--author '%s' is
I am using git 2.2.2 and want to report an issue with git push --repo option.
git 2.2.2 manual says that git push --repo=public will push to public
only if the current branch does not track a remote branch. See
http://git-scm.com/docs/git-push
However, I see that git pushes even when the
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in
our buildsystem with:
+ '[' '!' -f /builddir/build/SOURCES/patch-3.19-rc6.xz ']'
+ case $patch in
+ unxz
+ patch -p1 -F1 -s
symbolic link
32 matches
Mail list logo
