In the 2nd and 4th paragraph of DESCRIPTION, there ware misconversions
`submodule’s`.
It seems non-ASCII apostrophes, so I rewrite ASCII apostrophes.
Signed-off-by: Motoki Seki
---
Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentat
Before this patch, there are several non-ASCII apostrophes in
gitsubmodules.txt, and misconverged at the
https://git-scm.com/docs/gitsubmodules/ .
To make codes consistent, these non-ASCII apostrophes are replaced
with ASCII single quotes. This patch also makes the document readable
on the websit
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:53 PM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> The new completable options are:
>>
>> --directory
>> --exclude
>> --gpg-sign
>> --include
>> --keep-cr
>> --keep-non-patch
>> --message-id
>> --no-keep-cr
>> --patch-format
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> In general I'm mildly negative on adding this, for every user like Doron
> who'll be less confused by a hack like this, you'll have other users
> who'll be confused about git inexplicably working with ~ in the middle
> of strings, e
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:12:49PM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +In protocol v2 communication is command oriented. When first contacting a
> +server a list of capabilities will advertised. Some of these capabilities
> +will be commands which a client can request be executed. Once a command
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:12:50PM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +ls-refs takes in the following parameters wrapped in packet-lines:
> +
> +symrefs
> + In addition to the object pointed by it, show the underlying ref
> + pointed by it when showing a symbolic ref.
> +peel
> +
This is an initial attempt at adding an unshelve command to
git-p4.
For those not familiar with it, p4 shelve creates a "pending"
changelist, which isn't committed into the central repo but is
nonetheless visible to other develoeprs. The "unshelve" command
takes one of these pending changelists an
This can be used to "unshelve" a shelved P4 commit into
a git commit.
For example:
$ git p4 unshelve 12345
The resulting commit ends up in the branch:
refs/remotes/p4/unshelved/12345
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand
---
Documentation/git-p4.txt | 22
git-p4.py| 128 +
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:44:22PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:41 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > In order to allow for code sharing with the server-side of fetch in
> > protocol-v2 convert upload-pack to be a builtin.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams
>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:23:52PM -0800, Dorian Taylor wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> b/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> index a0e45f2889e6e..19d73f7efb338 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/http-
Hello,
I've found an issue in git when working with submodules.
My Project is set up using hundreds of components by submodules (and
nested submodules), that are independent created in central development
groups.
Now it occurs that the structure of the submodules is changed over time.
E.g.
Proje
R Hey,i am Lindsey ,How's everything with you,I have interest on you
after going through your profile I really want to have a good
friendship with you.Beside i have something very vital to tell you
On Thu, Feb 22 2018, Duy Nguyen jotted:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> In general I'm mildly negative on adding this, for every user like Doron
>> who'll be less confused by a hack like this, you'll have other users
>> who'll be confused about git inexplic
On Thu, Feb 22 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> Here's a v5 (correct subject line this time!). Many thanks to Eric for
>> a thorough review.
>
> We haven't seen any comments on this round. Is everybody happy?
>
> I do not have a strong opinion on the new fea
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>
>
> This indentation is funny. But I suspect it is because your whole patch
> seems to have been whitespace-damaged (see the section on gmail in
> "git help git-format-patch").
That is, bit-for-bit, what came out of that submitGit thing that is
On 02/21, Dorian Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Feb 21, 2018, at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for writing it.
> >
> > Do you mind if we forge your sign-off? (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > item '(5) Certify your work' for details about what this means.)
>
> Sure, or I can j
Brandon Williams writes:
>> Is the 'fixup!' cleanly squashable to the problematic one, or does
>> this series require another reroll to get it in a good enough shape?
>
> Yeah the fixup patch looks good to me. I don't think there was anything
> else that needed attention so it should be in goo
On 02/22, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:44:22PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:41 -0800
> > Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> > > In order to allow for code sharing with the server-side of fetch in
> > > protocol-v2 convert upload-pack to be a builtin.
> >
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:07:15AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 02/22, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:44:22PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:41 -0800
> > > Brandon Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > In order to allow for code sharing with the s
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:45 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > - get_remote_heads(fd[0], NULL, 0, &ref, 0, NULL, &shallow);
> > +
> > + packet_reader_init(&reader, fd[0], NULL, 0,
> > + PACKET_READ_CHOMP_NEWLINE |
> > +
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> +git-for-windows
> Hi,
>
> Raining Chain wrote:
>
>> On Windows 10, git version 2.16.2.windows.1, running the command
>>
>> git status
>>
>> will trigger a file change event to file C:\myPath\.git "Attributes
>> changed."
>>
>> This cause
Duy Nguyen writes:
> Now that you mention it, the only command that completes
> --rerere-autoupdate is git-merge. Since this is "auto" I don't think
> people want to type manually.
Sorry, but I do not quite get the connection between "since this is
'auto'" and the rest of the sentence. Is it ju
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:51 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > +extern struct ref **get_remote_refs(int fd_out, struct packet_reader
> > *reader,
> > + struct ref **list, int for_push,
> > + const str
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Derrick Stolee writes:
>
>> +'read'::
>> +
>> +Read a graph file given by the graph-head file and output basic
>> +details about the graph file.
>> ++
>> +With `--file=` option, consider the graph stored in the file at
>> +the path /info/.
>> +
>
> A sample reader confu
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:52 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > @@ -21,7 +22,8 @@ struct transport_vtable {
> > * the ref without a huge amount of effort, it should store it
> > * in the ref's old_sha1 field; otherwise it should be all 0.
> > **/
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:53 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > -const struct ref *transport_get_remote_refs(struct transport *transport)
> > +const struct ref *transport_get_remote_refs(struct transport *transport,
> > + co
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:19:22AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:51 -0800
> > Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> > > +extern struct ref **get_remote_refs(int fd_out, struct packet_reader
> > > *reader,
> > > +
Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone has any thoughts about the best, or
even any, way to have "branch properties": some extra information which
is attached to a branch (that is, the actual branch name not the commit
it currently points to).
My requirements are that the information needs to be pushed
Derrick Stolee writes:
> static struct opts_commit_graph {
> const char *obj_dir;
> const char *graph_file;
> + int set_latest;
> } opts;
> ...
> @@ -89,6 +106,8 @@ static int graph_write(int argc, const char **argv)
> { OPTION_STRING, 'o', "object-dir", &opts.obj_
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:52 AM, marmot1123 wrote:
> In the 2nd and 4th paragraph of DESCRIPTION, there ware misconversions
> `submodule’s`.
> It seems non-ASCII apostrophes, so I rewrite ASCII apostrophes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Motoki Seki
> ---
> Documentation/gitsubmodules.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 fi
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Stephen R Guglielmo
wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2018 10:34 PM, "Stephen R Guglielmo"
> wrote:
>
> This fixes `add` and `pull` for GPG signed objects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen R Guglielmo
Yay! Thanks for a patch!
I had to go back to the discussion
https://public-inbox.
Derrick Stolee writes:
> Teach git-commit-graph to delete the .graph files that are siblings of a
> newly-written graph file, except for the file referenced by 'graph-latest'
> at the beginning of the process and the newly-written file. If we fail to
> delete a graph file, only report a warning b
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:05 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > Introduce the transport-helper capability 'stateless-connect'. This
> > capability indicates that the transport-helper can be requested to run
> > the 'stateless-connect' command which should attem
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:57 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > +want
> > + Indicates to the server an object which the client wants to
> > + retrieve.
>
> Mention that the client can "want" anything even if not advertised by
> the server (like uploadp
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:07 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > Make a copy of the service name being requested instead of relying on
> > the buffer pointed to by the passed in 'const char *' to remain
> > unchanged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams
>
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:09 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ struct http_get_options {
> > * for details.
> > */
> > struct strbuf *base_url;
> > +
> > + struct string_list *extra_headers;
>
> Document this? For example:
>
On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:12 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > +test_expect_success 'push with http:// and a config of v2 does not request
> > v2' '
> > + # Till v2 for push is designed, make sure that if a client has
> > + # protocol.version configured to
Important details to share with you, kindly email me for info:
"peter.waddell...@gmail.com" Peter
On 02/22, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:12 -0800
> > Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> > > +test_expect_success 'push with http:// and a config of v2 does not
> > > request v2' '
> > > + # Till v2 for push is designed, make sure that if a clien
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> One of the design goals of protocol-v2 is to improve the semantics of
> flush packets. Currently in protocol-v1, flush packets are used both to
> indicate a break in a list of packet lines as well as an indication that
> one side has finis
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:17:39 -0800
Brandon Williams wrote:
> > > diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
> > > index 1f6611be2..2016461df 100644
> > > --- a/remote.h
> > > +++ b/remote.h
> > > @@ -150,10 +150,11 @@ int check_ref_type(const struct ref *ref, int
> > > flags);
> > > void free_refs(struct
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:26:58 -0500
Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:19:22AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:51 -0800
> > > Brandon Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > +extern struct ref **get_remote_refs(int fd_out, stru
Reduce code duplication by factoring out a function that reads an entire
file into a strbuf, or reports errors on stderr if something goes wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
The difference to using strbuf_read_file() is more detailed error
messages for open(2) failures. But I don't know if w
On 2/21/2018 6:57 PM, Josh Tepper wrote:
When using git log, boundary commits (ie, those commits added by
specifying --boundary) do not respect the order (e.g., --date-order,
--topo-order). Consider the following commit history, where number
indicates the order of the commit timestamps:
01
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> Factor out the logic for processing shallow, deepen, deepen_since, and
> deepen_not lines into their own functions to simplify the
> 'receive_needs()' function in addition to making it easier to reuse some
> of this logic when implementing
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:26:47 -0800
Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:53 -0800
> > Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> > > -const struct ref *transport_get_remote_refs(struct transport *transport)
> > > +const struct ref *transport_get_remote_refs(st
On 02/22, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > One of the design goals of protocol-v2 is to improve the semantics of
> > flush packets. Currently in protocol-v1, flush packets are used both to
> > indicate a break in a list of packet lines as well as
Hi,
Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:07:15AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
>> On 02/22, Jeff King wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:44:22PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:41 -0800
Brandon Williams wrote:
> In order to allow for code sharing w
On 02/22, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > Factor out the logic for processing shallow, deepen, deepen_since, and
> > deepen_not lines into their own functions to simplify the
> > 'receive_needs()' function in addition to making it easier to reuse
On 02/22, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:26:47 -0800
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > On 02/21, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:12:53 -0800
> > > Brandon Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > -const struct ref *transport_get_remote_refs(struct transport
> > > > *transport
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> @@ -56,6 +62,41 @@ static void die_initial_contact(int unexpected)
> "and the repository exists."));
> }
>
> +static enum protocol_version discover_version(struct packet_reader *reader)
> +{
> + enum protocol_v
> On 16 Feb 2018, at 17:58, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:42:35PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote:
> []
>>
>> Agreed. However, people using ShiftJIS are not my target audience.
>> My target audience are:
>>
>> (1) People that have to encode their text files in UTF-16 (
Jeff King writes:
> This indentation is funny. But I suspect it is because your whole patch
> seems to have been whitespace-damaged (see the section on gmail in
> "git help git-format-patch").
I saw somewhere "Apple-Mail" and a phrase "repaste". So perhaps
copy&paste on the client is involved i
> +static enum protocol_version discover_version(struct packet_reader *reader)
> +{
...
> +
> + /* Maybe process capabilities here, at least for v2 */
> + switch (version) {
> + case protocol_v1:
> + /* Read the peeked version line */
> + packet_reader_
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> On Thu, Feb 22 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted:
>
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>
>>> Here's a v5 (correct subject line this time!). Many thanks to Eric for
>>> a thorough review.
>>
>> We haven't seen any comments on this round. Is everybody happy?
>>
>> I
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:00:45PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote:
> > If it was only about a diff of UTF-16 files, I may suggest a patch.
> > I simply copy-paste it here for review, if someone thinks that it may
> > be useful, I can send it as a real patch/RFC.
>
> That's a nice idea but I see two
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:02 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I saw somewhere "Apple-Mail" and a phrase "repaste". So perhaps
> copy&paste on the client is involved in the whitespace damage (of
> course the original could be broken, but I somehow doubt it).
https://doriantaylor.com/file/well-ill-b
Jeff King writes:
> This is a repost of the two patches from:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180209185710.ga23...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
>
> (now just one patch, since sg/test-i18ngrep graduated and we can do it
> all in one step). The idea got positive feedback, but nobody commented
> on p
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >>> And possibly respecting pager.upload-pack, which would violate our rule
> >>> that it is safe to run upload-pack in untrusted repositories.
> >>
> >> And this isn't an issue with receive-pack because this same guarantee
> >> do
Stefan Beller writes:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:52 AM, marmot1123 wrote:
>> In the 2nd and 4th paragraph of DESCRIPTION, there ware misconversions
>> `submodule’s`.
>> It seems non-ASCII apostrophes, so I rewrite ASCII apostrophes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Motoki Seki
>> ---
>> Documentation/g
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:19:40PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > To be clear, which of the following are you (most) worried about?
> >
> > 1. being invoked with --help and spawning a pager
> > 2. receiving and acting on options between 'git' and 'upload-pack'
> > 3. repository discovery
> > 4.
marmot1123 writes:
> Before this patch, there are several non-ASCII apostrophes in
> gitsubmodules.txt, and misconverged at the
> https://git-scm.com/docs/gitsubmodules/ .
> To make codes consistent, these non-ASCII apostrophes are replaced
> with ASCII single quotes. This patch also makes the
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Forgot to say something of your own? Perhaps wanted to (1) show a
> sample of a better log message, (2) say "Acked-by", (3) re-raise the
> point that the same "error" already appears in the same file and it
> is better to clean them up
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +static void pack_line(const char *line)
> +{
> + if (!strcmp(line, "") || !strcmp(line, "\n"))
>From our in-office discussion:
v1/v0 packs pktlines twice in http, which is not possible to
construct using this test helper wh
Stefan Beller writes:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>>
>> Forgot to say something of your own? Perhaps wanted to (1) show a
>> sample of a better log message, (2) say "Acked-by", (3) re-raise the
>> point that the same "error" already appears in the same file and i
Hi,
When switching clean branches I see untracked files appearing where I expect to
see "nothing to commit, working tree clean".
This happens when submodules get removed on one branch but its present in
another.
I expect git to either not mark the submodule in git status as untracked or git
to
René Scharfe writes:
> Reduce code duplication by factoring out a function that reads an entire
> file into a strbuf, or reports errors on stderr if something goes wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
> ---
> The difference to using strbuf_read_file() is more detailed error
> messages for open
Hi,
Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> To be clear, which of the following are you (most) worried about?
>>
>> 1. being invoked with --help and spawning a pager
>> 2. receiving and acting on options between 'git' and 'upload-pack'
>> 3. repos
Jeff King wrote:
> The current property is that it's safe to fetch from an
> untrusted repository, even over ssh. If we're keeping that for protocol
> v1, we'd want it to apply to protocol v2, as well.
Ah, this is what I had been missing (the non-ssh case).
I see your point. I t
Hi Luke,
I really like the idea of creating a branch based on a shelved CL (We
particularly use shelves all the time), I tested your change and I
have some comments.
- I have some concerns about having the same "[git-p4...change =
.]" as if it were a real submitted CL.
One use case I for
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:24:02PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > But my greater concern is that people who
> > work on git.c should not have to worry about accidentally violating this
> > principle when they add a new feature or config option.
>
> That sounds like
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:26:34PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Keep in mind that git upload-archive (a read-only command, just like
> git upload-pack) also already has the same issues.
Yuck. I don't think we've ever made a historical promise about that. But
then, I don't think the promise abo
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:53:53 -0800
Brandon Williams wrote:
> > > @@ -612,6 +615,11 @@ static int process_connect_service(struct transport
> > > *transport,
> > > if (data->connect) {
> > > strbuf_addf(&cmdbuf, "connect %s\n", name);
> > > ret = run_connect(transport, &cmdbu
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:44:02PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> But I don't think it _is_ an accident waiting to happen for the rest of
> the commands. upload-pack is special. The point is that people may touch
> git.c thinking they are adding a nice new feature (like pager config, or
> aliases, or d
On 22 February 2018 at 21:39, Miguel Torroja wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> I really like the idea of creating a branch based on a shelved CL (We
> particularly use shelves all the time), I tested your change and I
> have some comments.
>
> - I have some concerns about having the same "[git-p4...change =
Dear Friend,
I am Mr.Daouda Ali the head of file department of Bank of
Africa(B.O.A) here in Burkina Faso / Ouagadougou. In my department we
discover an abandoned sum of (US$18 million US Dollars) in an account
that belongs to one of our foreign customer who died along with his
family in plane c
Jeff King wrote:
> All of that said, I think the current code is quite dangerous already,
> and maybe even broken. upload-pack may run sub-commands like rev-list
> or pack-objects, which are themselves builtins.
Sounds like more commands to set the IGNORE_PAGER_CONFIG flag for in
git.c.
Thanks
Hi,
I think we have a problem … or at least I had
and I’m not quite sure if this is „working as designed“
but I’m sure it „should not work as it did“.
Because? It pruned a lot of files and even the local repository.
by pull
by giving another repository URL instead of a known remote
While working
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:42:35PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > I couldn't quite get it to work, but I think it's because I'm doing
> > something wrong with the submodules. But I also think this attack would
> > _have_ to be done over ssh, because on a local system the submodule
> > clone wou
Hi Marcel,
Marcel 'childNo͡.de' Trautwein" wrote:
> I think we have a problem … or at least I had
> and I’m not quite sure if this is „working as designed“
> but I’m sure it „should not work as it did“.
[...]
> I wanted to clone another repository … but yeah … it’s late for me today and
> I put
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:05:15PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:42:35PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > > I couldn't quite get it to work, but I think it's because I'm doing
> > > something wrong with the submodules. But I also think this attack would
> > > _have_ to b
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:44:13PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21 2018, Peter Backes jotted:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:33:05PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >> This sounds like a sensible job for a git import tool, i.e. import a
> >> target directory into git,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Mike Friedrich wrote:
> git submodule add ../submodule sub
> git add sub
> git commit -m "submodule added"
>
> git checkout master
The original behavior of checkout is to ignore submodules, hence it
will be left alone.
Can you retry this recipe w
Thank You. This is interesting. There seems to be also a config option
submodule.recurse. I did not know that these options have such an effect on the
checkout command.
Best Regards, Mike
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Beller [mailto:sbel...@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 201
On 02/22, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:12:50PM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > +ls-refs takes in the following parameters wrapped in packet-lines:
> > +
> > +symrefs
> > + In addition to the object pointed by it, show the underlying ref
> > + pointed by it when showin
Hi, Git Developers,
Thanks for your help regarding my earlier email (trying to break git
pull --rebase).
I just wanted to warn you all that my first attempt at a patch is
imminent. I'm working on a "git squash" command. Here's a quick
summary:
--
git squash []
Squashes ..HEAD into a singl
Disclaimer: I am not a git developer, nor have I ever written
anything FUSE. So I apologize if the following is idiotic:
I've been looking for a virtual file system (in Linux) that works with
git to make huge working directories fast. I have found that
Microsoft has written GVFS in Windows for t
Hello ,
I am looking for a reliable supplier /manufacturer of products for sell in
Europe.
I came across your listing and wanted to get some information regarding minimum
Order Quantities, FOB pricing and also the possibility of packaging including
payments terms.
So could you please get
> Am 23.02.2018 um 00:20 schrieb Jonathan Nieder :
>
> Hi Marcel,
>
> …
> Sorry, this is not the most helpful reply but:
>
> Can you describe a reproduction recipe so that I can experience the
> same thing?
>
> That is:
>
> 1. steps to reproduce
> 2. expected result
> 3. actual result
> 4. the
Julius Musseau writes:
> git squash []
>
> Squashes ..HEAD into a single commit. Replaces HEAD with the
> result. If not specified, defaults to the current branch's
> upstream (a.k.a. @{upstream}).
>
> Rationale:
>
> This command provides an intuitive mechanism for in-place squash that
> doesn'
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:29:55AM +0100, "Marcel 'childNo͡.de' Trautwein"
wrote:
> shows me a quite different behavior, so solely rebase not seems the full
> problem
> BUT
> `--rebase=preserve` will .. o’man , really, is this intended?
Yeah, the bug seems to be in --preserve-merges. Here's an
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:29:25PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
> Reduce code duplication by factoring out a function that reads an entire
> file into a strbuf, or reports errors on stderr if something goes wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
> ---
> The difference to using strbuf_read_file() i
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:49:52AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > +static ssize_t strbuf_read_file_or_whine(struct strbuf *sb, const char
> > *path)
> > +{
> > + int fd;
> > + ssize_t len;
> > +
> > + fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + return error_errno(_("could no
93 matches
Mail list logo