from cvs' URL and couldn't find one.
Thomas, I suspect you have a wrong David, and would want to ask
David Greaves instead.
quite right.
I've dropped out somewhat since moving house/job. I'll fix it.
David
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body
Hi Christian
Can I suggest a 'summary diff' option
It's basically a diff between the tree of the commit and the tree of the
parent commit
It would show what files have changed rather than the diff of the files
that have changed. (kinda like diffstat without the for now)
(or maybe just
We've decided to go for the individual scripts directly. :-)
Just to clarify - individual scripts or $0 name handling?
I kinda like one big script - also means we don't need to 'install' it
to get access to Cogito.pm...
Unfortunately, you didn't send the attachments inline, so I can't
comment on
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:41:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
This patch adds somewhat-improved usage messages to some of Linus' programs.
Specifically, they now handle -? / --help.
just so you know, the intention of
noticed a couple of points:
* update-cache won't accept ./file or fred/./file
* checkout-cache doesn't seem to preserve mode
Are these bugs or should they be documented?
I've taken the approach of documenting behaviour for now.
Signed-off-by: David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, David Greaves wrote:
In doing this I noticed a couple of points:
* update-cache won't accept ./file or fred/./file
The comment in update-cache.c reads:
/*
* We fundamentally don't like some paths: we don't want
* dot or dot-dot anywhere, and in fact
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Rhys Hardwick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/repo/tmp.repo$ commit-tree
c80156fafbac377ab35beb076090c8320f874f91
Committing initial tree c80156fafbac377ab35beb076090c8320f874f91
At this point, the command seems to be just waiting.
That's _exactly_ what
David A. Wheeler wrote:
I propose changing pull to ONLY download, and update to pull AND merge.
Why? It seems oddly inconsistent that pull sometimes merges
in changes, but at other times it doesn't.
true
I propose that there be two subcommands, pull and update
(now that update isn't a reserved
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:40:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Here is perhaps a better way to provide detailed help for each
git command. A command.help file for each command can be
written in the style of a man page.
I
Steven Cole wrote:
Speaking of I think, the name cogito was suggested for the
SCM layer, but IIRC Linus suggested staying with just plain git. Petr
suggested tig, perhaps because it looks at git from another point of view.
I haven't read _all_ the mails - I thought cogito was kinda selected and
Hi
I'm just starting to look at git (and cogito).
Earlier this morning I got and built
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2
I then did a git pull pasky and a make.
All went well.
A couple of hours later I did another git pull pasky and had the problem
shown below.
I moved
Junio C Hamano wrote:
DG It allows:
DG find src -type f | git add -
I am slow today, but have you considered using xargs?
yep thanks :)
I know you _could_ do it with xargs - but you _could_ use the raw git
commands too. This is a be nice to the user layer and I was
'surprised' that neither
12 matches
Mail list logo
