HEAD@{14}: guilt-push:
> respect-nobarrier-mount-option-in-nojournal-mode
> d08854f HEAD@{15}: guilt-pop: updating HEAD
> d08854f HEAD@{16}: guilt-pop: updating HEAD
> d08854f HEAD@{17}: guilt-push:
> optimize-ext4_should_retry_alloc-to-improve-ENOSPC-performance
>
> Signed-off
v0.36. Yes, it's
been *way* too long since the last release, but hopefully that will change
going forward. By far, the most changes come from Per Cederqvist who
cleaned up some rather dark corners in the code. Thanks!
As always, patches, and other feedback is welcome.
Josef Jeff Sipek
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:44:16PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Hi Josef,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:20:46AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:04:45PM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote:
?? 2013-8-9??10:46??Josef 'Jeff' Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net д
On Fri, Aug
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:32:28PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
From: Zheng Liu gnehzuil@gmail.com
Currently guilt doesn't support FreeBSD platform. This commit tries to
add this support. The file called 'os.FreeBSD' is copied from os.Darwin
due to these two platforms have almost the same
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:04:45PM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote:
�� 2013-8-9��10:46��Josef 'Jeff' Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net д
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:32:28PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
From: Zheng Liu gnehzuil@gmail.com
Currently guilt doesn't support FreeBSD platform
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:10:10AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:39:21PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
I applied this one and the guilt: skip empty line after... patch.
Thanks! BTW, it looks like you are not using git am -s to apply
these patches? The reason
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:01:36PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote:
When the option is true (the default), Guilt does not create a new Git
branch when patches are applied. This way, you can switch between
Guilt 0.35 and the current version of Guilt with no issues.
At a future time, maybe a year
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:45:31AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I just had another idea (although I haven't had a chance to code up
anything yet). Perhaps instead of, or in addition to, a global
setting (i.e., guilt.reusebranch), perhaps we should have a per-branch
setting, such as
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:55:57PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
To make it harder to accidentally do git push with a guilt patch
applied, guilt push changes branch from e.g. master to
guilt/master starting with commit 67d3af63f422. This is a feature
which I use for ext4 development; I actually
I applied this one and the guilt: skip empty line after... patch.
Jeff.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:13:31PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
If the date field has a space in it, such as:
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:37:15 +0200
previously guilt would go belly up:
+ export
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
of my own. Completely untested, except for running the regression
tests. These are also available via git protocol from
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:19:39PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:
On 01/16/13 03:26, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
of my own. Completely untested, except for running the regression
tests. These
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:26:06PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
of my own. Completely untested, except for running the
13 matches
Mail list logo