subject:"\[PATCH\] gpg\-interface\: use more status letters"

Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: use more status letters

2016-09-27 Thread Junio C Hamano

Michael J Gruber writes: > According to gpg2's doc/DETAILS: > "For each signature only one of the codes GOODSIG, BADSIG, EXPSIG, > EXPKEYSIG, REVKEYSIG or ERRSIG will be emitted." > > gpg1 ("classic") behaves the same (although doc/DETAILS > differs). > > Currently, we

[PATCH] gpg-interface: use more status letters

2016-09-27 Thread Michael J Gruber

According to gpg2's doc/DETAILS: "For each signature only one of the codes GOODSIG, BADSIG, EXPSIG, EXPKEYSIG, REVKEYSIG or ERRSIG will be emitted." gpg1 ("classic") behaves the same (although doc/DETAILS differs). Currently, we parse gpg's status output for GOODSIG, BADSIG and trust information