On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
In set notation,
non-NULL =
non-NULL and not NULL_SHA1 ∪
non-NULL and equal to NULL_SHA1
The latter two are *not* treated the same, so I don't see
On 06/08/2015 06:43 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Delete the specified reference. If old_sha1 is non-NULL and not
+ * NULL_SHA1, then verify that the current value of the reference is
+ * old_sha1 before
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 06/08/2015 06:43 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Delete the specified reference. If old_sha1 is non-NULL and not
+ *
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Also
* Add a docstring
* Rename the second parameter to old_sha1, to be consistent with the
convention used elsewhere in the refs module
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
cache.h | 2 --
Also
* Add a docstring
* Rename the second parameter to old_sha1, to be consistent with the
convention used elsewhere in the refs module
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
cache.h | 2 --
refs.c | 5 +++--
refs.h | 9 +
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4
5 matches
Mail list logo