On 04/15/2013 07:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
The old version was inconsistent: when a reference was
REF_KNOWS_PEELED but with a null peeled value, it returned non-zero
for the current reference but zero for other references. Change the
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
The old version was inconsistent: when a reference was
REF_KNOWS_PEELED but with a null peeled value, it returned non-zero
for the current reference but zero for other references. Change the
behavior for non-current references to match that of
The old version was inconsistent: when a reference was
REF_KNOWS_PEELED but with a null peeled value, it returned non-zero
for the current reference but zero for other references. Change the
behavior for non-current references to match that of current_ref,
which is what callers expect. Document
3 matches
Mail list logo