On 03/04/2014 03:08 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
Is it correct to single out only edit for special treatment? If
allowing edit on the command-line, then shouldn't command-line
reword also
On 03/04/2014 11:24 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
git rebase --fixup COMMIT
git rebase --squash COMMIT
This is not interactive (except when merge conflicts occur), is it?
--fixup would not be interactive (is that a
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
... All of the following seem to make sense:
git rebase --edit COMMIT
A long-form for the -e option we have been talking about.
It is unfortunately that this spelling sounds like the
--edit option on git commit
On 03/02/2014 10:09 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 03/02/2014 10:09 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
git rebase -e
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
Logically, yes. Practically, no. If you have to put multiple -e and
some hashes in one line, wouldn't editing to-do list in your favorite
editor be faster?
An editor is the last resort when the card puncher is broken.
--
David Kastrup
--
To unsubscribe
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
to save your time. The time saving is
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
to save your time. The time saving is
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the
git rebase -e XYZ is basically the same as
EDITOR=sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@ \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
to save your time. The time saving is only significant when you edit a
lot of commits separately.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn
12 matches
Mail list logo
