Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
It's wrong to call get_sha1() if they should be SHA-1s, plus
inefficient.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
It appears that they should be SHA-1s assumption does not hold;
this patch breaks at least 3303, 9020,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
It's wrong to call get_sha1() if they should be SHA-1s, plus
inefficient.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
It appears that they should
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Turns out most of the get_sha1() calls were correct; this does the trick:
diff --git a/builtin/fast-export.c b/builtin/fast-export.c
index 18fdfb3..d1d68e9 100644
--- a/builtin/fast-export.c
+++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@
It's wrong to call get_sha1() if they should be SHA-1s, plus
inefficient.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
builtin/fast-export.c | 2 +-
fast-import.c | 10 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/fast-export.c
4 matches
Mail list logo