Hi Phillip,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 09/08/18 10:22, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >>>
> >>> + else if (is_fixup(command)) {
> >>> +
On 09/08/18 10:22, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
>
>> On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Johannes Schindelin
>>>
>>> The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
>>>
>>> Since
Hi Phillip,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >
> > From: Johannes Schindelin
> >
> > The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
> >
> > Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this
On 06/08/18 16:23, Phillip Wood wrote:
Hi Johannes
On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply
Hi Johannes
On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an
exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of
6 matches
Mail list logo
