Hi Johannes,
this looks good to me, too!
Cheers,
Alban
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor writes:
>
> >> To prevent that from happening, let's append `^0` after the stash hash,
> >> to make sure that it is interpreted as an OID rather than as a number.
> >
> > Oh, this is clever.
>
> Yeah, we can do this as we know we'd
SZEDER Gábor writes:
>> To prevent that from happening, let's append `^0` after the stash hash,
>> to make sure that it is interpreted as an OID rather than as a number.
>
> Oh, this is clever.
Yeah, we can do this as we know we'd be dealing with a commit-ish.
If we made a mistake to use a tree
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 03:15:05PM -0700, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> From: Johannes Schindelin
>
> When `git stash apply ` sees an argument that consists only of
> digits, it tries to be smart and interpret it as `stash@{}`.
>
> Unfortunately, an all-digit hash (which is
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 6:15 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> When `git stash apply ` sees an argument that consists only of
> digits, it tries to be smart and interpret it as `stash@{}`.
>
> Unfortunately, an all-digit hash (which is unlikely but still possible)
> is therefore
From: Johannes Schindelin
When `git stash apply ` sees an argument that consists only of
digits, it tries to be smart and interpret it as `stash@{}`.
Unfortunately, an all-digit hash (which is unlikely but still possible)
is therefore misinterpreted as `stash@{}` reflog.
To prevent that from
6 matches
Mail list logo
