On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:01:56PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
more intuitive,...
Thanks; I understand that this
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:01:56PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
This series of commits attempts to make test output
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:44:53PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 256f1c6..31f59af 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ then
pass)
tput setaf 2;;# green
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:44:53PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 256f1c6..31f59af 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ then
pass)
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Good point, I forgot to check what it looked like with -v. Since this
series is already on v6, is there a more lightweight way of addressing
this tiny tweak than sending v7?
It is ultimately up to Junio, but I suspect he would be OK if you just
reposted
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:21:09AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The expected_failure cases painted in warn are all long-known
failures; I do not think reminding about them in bold over and
over will help encouraging the developers take a look at them.
The skipped cases fall into two
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Good point, I forgot to check what it looked like with -v. Since this
series is already on v6, is there a more lightweight way of addressing
this tiny tweak than sending v7?
It is
This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
more intuitive, so that:
- red is only used for things which have gone unexpectedly wrong:
test failures, unexpected test passes, and failures with the
framework,
- yellow is only used for known breakages,
- green is
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
more intuitive,...
Thanks; I understand that this is to replace the previous one
b465316 (tests: paint unexpectedly fixed known breakages in bold
red, 2012-09-19)---am I correct?
- red is
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
more intuitive,...
Thanks; I understand that this is to replace the previous one
b465316 (tests: paint unexpectedly
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
more intuitive,...
Thanks; I understand that this is to replace the previous
11 matches
Mail list logo
