On 03/26/2017 04:16 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Haggerty
> wrote:
>>> +/* ref_store_init flags */
>>> +#define REF_STORE_READ (1 << 0)
>>
>> I asked [1] in reply to v5 whether `REF_STORE_READ` is really necessary
>> but I
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> +/* ref_store_init flags */
>> +#define REF_STORE_READ (1 << 0)
>
> I asked [1] in reply to v5 whether `REF_STORE_READ` is really necessary
> but I don't think you replied. Surely a reference store
On 03/18/2017 03:03 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> files-backend.c is unlearning submodules. Instead of having a specific
> check for submodules to see what operation is allowed, files backend
> now takes a set of flags at init. Each operation will check if the
> required flags is present
files-backend.c is unlearning submodules. Instead of having a specific
check for submodules to see what operation is allowed, files backend
now takes a set of flags at init. Each operation will check if the
required flags is present before performing.
For now we have four flags: read, write and
4 matches
Mail list logo