Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Hi Peff, On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more > > > extensible. After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new > > > rebase -i command that does nothing

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible. >> > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that >> > does nothing else than shelling

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible. >> > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that >> >

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Chris Packham wrote: > >> This is similar to the existing "reword" command in that it can be used >> to update the commit message the difference is that the editor presented

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible. > > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that > > does nothing else than shelling out to a command. > > Yup, I tend to

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Johannes Schindelin writes: > ... my Git garden shears [*1*] (essentially, what > git rebase --interactive --preserve-merges *should* have been). Any plan to fold it into "git rebase -i" as a new (improved) mode of operation, by the way? > However, I could imagine

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Hi Junio, On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > ... my Git garden shears [*1*] (essentially, what > > git rebase --interactive --preserve-merges *should* have been). > > Any plan to fold it into "git rebase -i" as a new

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Chris Packham writes: > This is similar to the existing "reword" command in that it can be used > to update the commit message the difference is that the editor presented > to the user for the commit. It provides a useful shorthand for "exec git > commit --amend

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Hi Chris, On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > I can understand how this "sign" command helps you. I myself wished for > new commands when working on my Git garden shears [*1*] (essentially, what > git rebase --interactive --preserve-merges *should* have been). And of course I

Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

Hi Chris, On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Chris Packham wrote: > This is similar to the existing "reword" command in that it can be used > to update the commit message the difference is that the editor presented > to the user for the commit. It provides a useful shorthand for "exec git > commit --amend

[RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command

This is similar to the existing "reword" command in that it can be used to update the commit message the difference is that the editor presented to the user for the commit. It provides a useful shorthand for "exec git commit --amend --no-edit -s" Signed-off-by: Chris Packham