p = 0x55a66c30,
disk_sizep = 0x0, delta_base_sha1 = 0x0,
typename = 0x0, contentp = 0x0, whence = OI_LOOSE, u = {packed =
{pack = 0x0, offset = 0,
is_delta = 0}}}
Ok we can see that "disk_sizep = 0x0" which means that it segfault
because line 1496 tries to read the value pointed to by disk_sizep
which is NULL.
I hope this will help you.
Best,
Christian.
2017-12-29 17:04 GMT+03:00 Оля Тележная :
> 2017-12-29 16:22 GMT+03:00 Jeff King :
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:05:50PM +0300, Оля Тележная wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I am trying to reuse formatting logic from ref-filter in cat-file
>>> command. Now
2017-12-29 16:22 GMT+03:00 Jeff King :
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:05:50PM +0300, Оля Тележная wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I am trying to reuse formatting logic from ref-filter in cat-file
>> command. Now cat-file uses its own formatting code.
>> I am trying to achieve that
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:05:50PM +0300, Оля Тележная wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am trying to reuse formatting logic from ref-filter in cat-file
> command. Now cat-file uses its own formatting code.
> I am trying to achieve that step-by-step, now I want to invoke
> populate_value function, and I
work will go further,
but now I need to fix current situation.
You could write here or leave comments in github if you have any ideas.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Olga
to leave my situation here to come over to your country
to continue my education.
I have made research before contacting you and please I want you to
help me come to your country to start my new life.
I will tell you more about my condition if you are willing to help me
come over to your country
Hi Josef,
On 20/12/2017 12:43, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
>> $ git add -u
>> $ git reset
>
> This would be added after the "git checkout -m -B master FETCH_HEAD"
> command?
Yes, so it would be something like this:
git fetch origin master && #1
git checkout -m -B master
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:43:37PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> Thanks to you both for your patience with me. Sorry for the late reply, my day
> job was needing me ;-)
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:58:14PM +0100, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
> > On 15/12/2017 17:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:09:17AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
> > Junio, what about consecutive runs, while merge conflicts are still
> > unresolved?
>
> The impression I got was that the original running with svn does not
> deal with
Thanks to you both for your patience with me. Sorry for the late reply, my day
job was needing me ;-)
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:58:14PM +0100, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
> On 15/12/2017 17:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > $ git fetch
> > $ git checkout -m -B FETCH_HEAD
For some reason,
On 15/12/2017 20:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Junio, what about consecutive runs, while merge conflicts are still
> > unresolved?
>
> The impression I got was that the original running with svn does not
> deal with conflicting situation anyway, so I did not think about it
> at all, and I
Igor Djordjevic writes:
> Junio, what about consecutive runs, while merge conflicts are still
> unresolved?
The impression I got was that the original running with svn does not
deal with conflicting situation anyway, so I did not think about it
at all, and I
On 15/12/2017 17:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> $ git fetch
> $ git checkout -m -B FETCH_HEAD
... aaand that`s how you do it[1] without a temporary branch :)
Junio, what about consecutive runs, while merge conflicts are still
unresolved?
Seeing Josef having a pretty relaxed flow,
Hi Josef,
Thank you for your patient answers. From what you said here and in
that other reply[1], it looks like you know what you`re doing, you`re
aware of circumstances, and you still prefer doing it that way.
So, here it goes... :)
On 15/12/2017 13:47, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
> > I`m thinking
t; behavior of "svn update"?
You do not mind a temporary inconsistency while "svn update" runs
(it starts to update a file you may have local changes, but your
test may run while the update is in the middle of it). So perhaps
something along the lines of this would help. Assumin
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 02:17:40AM +0100, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
>
> This said, and without having you to change your habits too much (nor
> use Git in possibly awkward ways), I`m thinking you may actually
> benefit of using `git worktree add `[1] to create a
> temporary working tree ("working
Thanks for your input, Igor!
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:27:09PM +0100, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
> Aside "update and merge" working copy while you`re hacking on it,
> what happens with "execute" part? It seems really strange that you
> don`t mind cron job running the same scripts which you are
Thanks for your answer, Randall,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
>
> You might want to consider a slight modification to your approach as
> follows.
> Instead of using git pull, use git fetch.
> Have each system on its own branch (sys1 = my-sys1-branch, for
On 14/12/2017 23:27, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
>
> As you basically have a flow where two users (you and cron job) can
> edit same files at the same time, desired outcome might be a bit
> ambiguous, especially when scheduled execution of those files is
> added to the mix.
This said, and without
Hi Josef,
I`m not a Git expert, and I know less of Subversion, but following
your explanation, I might try to help, at least until more
experienced people join.
On 14/12/2017 14:09, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
> Every machine has a working copy of the repository in a specific
> directory. A
> On December 14, 2017 8:10 AM, Josef Wolf wrote:
> Subject: Need help migrating workflow from svn to git.
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I am wondering whether/how my mode of work for a specific project
> (currently based on SVN) could be transferred to git.
>
> I have a
Hello folks,
I am wondering whether/how my mode of work for a specific project
(currently based on SVN) could be transferred to git.
I have a repository for maintaining configuration of hosts. This repository
contains several hundered scripts. Most of those scripts are don't depend on
each
while writing up a cheat sheet with a visual layout of .git for my
students, i compared "git help repository-layout" to my git clone of
the kernel source tree, and noted the following things are not
mentioned in the repo layout help page -- i have no idea how complete
that page i
Would be useful if these missing options could be added.
Was just checking the version using regular git when I noticed.
$ git --version
git version 2.7.4
I'm not a member of the list, so please cc me in any replies.
Cheers, Jonny
With the 'git stash save' interface, it was easily possible for users to
try to add a message which would start with "-", which 'git stash save'
would interpret as a command line argument, and fail. For this case we
added some extra help on how to create a stash with a messag
Do you need a loan to enhance your business?, Loan to consolidate your
debt,Loan for personal use, Loan for credit Card, Medical Care loan,Car
Loan,Mortgage Loan, Student Loan, loan for any purposes? e.t.c.Get loan at 1%
interest rate annually, Hurry up now and fill out this below application
Dear Friend
I am contacting you on a business deal of $9,500,000.00 Million United States
Dollars, ready for transfer into your own personal account and if we make this
claim, we will share it on the ratio of 50% / 50% basis, I would like to assure
you that it be 100% risk free and it will be
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Nityananda wrote:
> Hello,
> I am new to this community. I am facing a problem while using the
> "make" command inside the "t/" folder.
>
> The error is
>
>
> "1..31
> Makefile:49: recipe for target 't5551-http-fetch-smart.sh'
ng directory '/home/nitya/projects/git/t'
Makefile:36: recipe for target 'test' failed
make: *** [test] Error 2"
It will really be an act of kindness if you help me out.
Regards,
Nityananda Gohain
Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> Brandon Casey <draf...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Currently, when parse_options() produces a help message it always emits
>> a blank line after the usage text to separate it from the options text.
>> If the opti
Brandon Casey <draf...@gmail.com> writes:
> Currently, when parse_options() produces a help message it always emits
> a blank line after the usage text to separate it from the options text.
> If the option spec does not define any switches, or only defines hi
Currently, when parse_options() produces a help message it always emits
a blank line after the usage text to separate it from the options text.
If the option spec does not define any switches, or only defines hidden
switches that will not be displayed, then the help text will end up with
two
From: Jeff Hostetler <jeffh...@microsoft.com>
Add help text for new object filtering options to
pack-objects documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffh...@microsoft.com>
---
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
From: Jeff Hostetler
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
---
Documentation/git-rev-list.txt | 9 -
Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 32
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
When searching for flag characters in the option spec, we should ensure
the search stays within the bounds of the option spec and does not enter
the help text portion of the spec. So when we find the boundary white
space marking the start of the help text, let's mark it with a nul
character
Currently, rev-parse only interprets a space ' ' character as the
delimiter between the option spec and the help text. So if a tab
character is placed between the option spec and the help text, it will
be interpreted as part of the long option name or as part of the arg
hint
When the user tries to use '--help' option on an aliased command
information about the alias is printed as sshown below,
$ git co --help
`git co' is aliased to `checkout'
This doesn't seem correct as the user has aliased only 'co' and not
'git co'. This might even be incorrect in cases
Greetings,
I am Miss elizabeth 22 years old i have every important things to discus with
you. Please respond with your most secure email address to enable me give you
the brief details of proposer, please write me on this email
elizabethcot...@barid.com
Looking forward for your positive
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
builtin/help.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/builtin/help.c b/builtin/help.c
index 334a8494ab..991a8bb16c 100644
--- a/builtin/help.c
+++ b/builtin/help.c
@@ -137,21 +137,22 @@ static void exec_woman_emacs(const char *path,
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
builtin/help.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/builtin/help.c b/builtin/help.c
index 12fb48933e..b3f60a8f30 100644
--- a/builtin/help.c
+++ b/builtin/help.c
@@ -123,14 +123,15 @@ static int check_emacsclient_version(void)
static
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
builtin/help.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/builtin/help.c b/builtin/help.c
index 991a8bb16c..12fb48933e 100644
--- a/builtin/help.c
+++ b/builtin/help.c
@@ -167,9 +167,10 @@ static void exec_man_man(const char *path, const
advices configurable via the 'advice.commitMsg'
> config variable.
It may not be a bad idea, but the code after the patch does look
ugly with too deep indentation levels. Can some refactoring help, I
wonder?
Is that advice.commitMsg? It looks more like commitEditor advice to
me but it may be just me.
> So I actually would be OK with having an advice.* option to squelch
> rebase and/or commit instructions. But only if users decide they would
> never like to see that text. So yes, your tool could piggy-back on that
> config option, but it would be a slight abuse of the intent.
I don't mind the
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 01:26:09AM +0300, Kirill Likhodedov wrote:
> > Not at all interested, as that would mean your tool will tell its
> > users to set such a configuration variable and their interactive use
> > of Git outside your tool will behave differently from other people
> > who use
> On 24 Jul 2017, at 01:09 , Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Who is running "git commit --amend" and "git rebase -i" in the
> workflow of a user of your tool? Is it the end user who types these
> commands to the shell command prompt, or does your tool formulate
> the command line
Kirill Likhodedov writes:
> My motivation is the following: I'm improving the Git client
> inside of IntelliJ IDEA IDE and I would like to provide only the
> plain commit message text to the user (any hints can be shown
> separately, not inside the editor).
Who
eractive rebase
is implemented in git-rebase--interactive.sh which always makes a call
to append_todo_help to append the help text to the todo list of commits.
> and the one which appears at the bottom of the commit editor (which
> appears on rewording a commit or squashing commits)?
This one too
the plain commit message text to the
user (any hints can be shown separately, not inside the editor).
I know I can load the original commit message myself (but I prefer not to make
extra calls when possible); and I can parse and strip out the help pages (but
it is not very reliable since the text may
From: Jeff Hostetler
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
---
Documentation/git-rev-list.txt | 7 ++-
Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 26 ++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From: Jeff Hostetler <jeffh...@microsoft.com>
Update pack-objects help text to describe object filtering.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffh...@microsoft.com>
---
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentat
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:13:59PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > There are other die calls hidden deeper. For instance:
> >
> > $ git -c core.ignorecase=foo help config
> > fatal: bad numeric config value 'foo' for 'core.ignorecase': invalid unit
> >
> >
gt; > - return git_default_config(var, value, cb);
>> > + return 0;
>>
>> Instead of ignoring any default config, we could do
>>
>> git_default_config(var, value, cb);
>> /* ignore broken config, we may be the help call for conf
gnoring any default config, we could do
>
> git_default_config(var, value, cb);
> /* ignore broken config, we may be the help call for config */
> return 0;
>
> I looked through git_default_config which seems to only die
> with useful error messages for compressio
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:49:21PM +0100, Peter Krefting wrote:
>
>> That's fine. However, when trying to look for help, it is not that useful:
>>
>> $ git config --help
>> error: malfor
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:49:21PM +0100, Peter Krefting wrote:
> That's fine. However, when trying to look for help, it is not that useful:
>
> $ git config --help
> error: malformed value for branch.autosetuprebase
> fatal: bad config variable 'branch.autosetuprebase
trying to look for help, it is not that
useful:
$ git config --help
error: malformed value for branch.autosetuprebase
fatal: bad config variable 'branch.autosetuprebase' in file '.git/config' at
line 24
Perhaps it should allow "--help" to go through even if the
configurat
anything I did, wrong?
>
Ok, at last I was able to build git with https support using 'curl'
built from it's source. Anyways, thanks for the help, folks.
> > This is probably because you are trying to run without installing?
>
> Nope. I'm *installing* git not
at bin-wrappers/ directory at the
> top-level of your build tree (that is how our tests can run on an
> otherwise virgin box with no Git installed).
>
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 13:11 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>
> $ make N
uld I be missing?
>
> There is
>
> ifndef NO_GETTEXT
> all:: $(MOFILES)
> endif
>
> which attempts to avoid generating *.mo files, but that does not
> seem to be working.
The above comes from one of the Tcl things (probably gitk-git)
For now
$ make NO_GETTEXT=1 N
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Building without localization support
>
> I tried to build git from source without localization support by adding
> the following line to the Makefile,
>
> NO_GETTEXT=1
>
> It
On 2017-07-03 15:18, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Building without localization support
>
> I tried to build git from source without localization support by adding
> the following line to the Makefile,
>
> NO_GETTEXT=1
>
May be
make
Hello all,
Building without localization support
I tried to build git from source without localization support by adding
the following line to the Makefile,
NO_GETTEXT=1
It doesn't seem to be working for reasons I'm unable to find. I used
the following
HELP ME PLEASE
My name is Miss Victoria Jenny looking for a trustworthy, sincere and
honest someone like you who can help me in this time of needs.
My father is Rufus Okana, during the civil and political crisis in our
country, my parents together with my three sisters was poisoned by
heartless
Hi Jonathan,
> > This regression was fixed in 91a640ffb6d9 ("ls-remote: a lone "-h" is
> > [...]
>
> Without this patch, I'm able to run
>
> git ls-remote -h .
>
> This patch removes that support. Intended?
*hihi* okay it was to counter-intuitive for me. "91a640ffb6d" talks about this
Hi,
Silvio Fricke wrote:
> This regression was fixed in 91a640ffb6d9 ("ls-remote: a lone "-h" is
> asking for help") and the wrong help text was introduced in ba5f28bf79ea
> ("ls-remote: use parse-options api").
> This patch removes the "-h"
Hi,
a small patch about a wrong help text. Please include when okay.
Best Regards,
Silvio
Silvio Fricke (1):
ls-remote: remove "-h" from help text
builtin/ls-remote.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.13.2
This regression was fixed in 91a640ffb6d9 ("ls-remote: a lone "-h" is
asking for help") and the wrong help text was introduced in ba5f28bf79ea
("ls-remote: use parse-options api").
This patch removes the "-h" on the help text.
Signed-off-by: Silvio Fricke &
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:11:29AM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> I am yet another user of 'git alias' (who wouldn't ?). It has become so
> natural to me to use the aliased version that at some point of time I
> tried the following,
>
> > $ git co --help
> > `git co'
You could also just make the alias a bash function that does git help
checkout when you pass the --help flag to the alias.
Marc Branchaud writes:
> When auto-correct is enabled, an invalid git command prints a warning and
> a continuation message, which differs depending on whether or not
> help.autoCorrect is positive or negative.
>
> With help.autoCorrect = 15:
>
>WARNING: You called a
ion is whether it is more important to tell the user that it's
> an
> alias (and which options the alias is using!),
Now, that's something I didn't think of. Does seem to quite an issue as
aliases accept argument this.
I seem to be getting the idea of '--help' just now. All these d
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:11:29AM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> I am yet another user of 'git alias' (who wouldn't ?). It has become so
> natural to me to use the aliased version that at some point of time I
> tried the following,
>
> > $ git co --help
> > `git co'
Hello all,
I am yet another user of 'git alias' (who wouldn't ?). It has become so
natural to me to use the aliased version that at some point of time I
tried the following,
> $ git co --help
> `git co' is aliased to `checkout'
That made me wonder. Git is able to inform the user th
When auto-correct is enabled, an invalid git command prints a warning and
a continuation message, which differs depending on whether or not
help.autoCorrect is positive or negative.
With help.autoCorrect = 15:
WARNING: You called a Git command named 'lgo', which does not exist.
Continuing
Hi!
What do I do next, to finish reverting multiple commits? I'd use
'--skip' in 'git rebase', but 'revert' doesn't have one?
[skeleton (tmp|REVERTING)]$ git revert --continue
On branch tmp
You are currently reverting commit d8a30d3.
nothing to commit, working tree clean
[skeleton
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 09:02 -0500, Marc Branchaud wrote:
> When auto-correct is enabled, an invalid git command prints a warning
> and
> a continuation message, which differs depending on whether or not
> help.autoCorrect is positive or negative.
>
> With help.autoCorrect = 15:
>
> WARNING:
On 2017-06-20 02:04 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 09:02 -0500, Marc Branchaud wrote:
When auto-correct is enabled, an invalid git command prints a warning
and
a continuation message, which differs depending on whether or not
help.autoCorrect is positive or negative.
With
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 09:02 -0500, Marc Branchaud wrote:
> When auto-correct is enabled, an invalid git command prints a warning
> and
> a continuation message, which differs depending on whether or not
> help.autoCorrect is positive or negative.
>
> With help.autoCorrect = 15:
>
> WARNING:
Git has this feature which suggests similar commands (including aliases)
in case the user specified an unknown command.
This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
aliases right now: when a command is not a builtin, we use the regular
config machinery (meaning: discovering
Git has this feature which suggests similar commands (including aliases)
in case the user specified an unknown command.
This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
aliases right now: when a command is not a builtin, we use the regular
config machinery (meaning: discovering
on 28th July, 2011 and after two days later my
mother with my two brothers was killed one early morning by the rebels
as result of civil war that going on in my country Libya. I am now
writing to seek for your assistance from Guinea Conakry where I
managed to escape nearby country through the help
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:53:38PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Git has this feature which suggests similar commands (including aliases)
> in case the user specified an unknown command.
>
> This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
> aliases right now: when a
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> This is slightly less performant than the previous way, as the early
> config is used *twice*: once to see whether the command refers to an
> alias, and then to see what aliases are most similar. However, this is
> hardly a
Git has this feature which suggests similar commands (including aliases)
in case the user specified an unknown command.
This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
aliases right now: when a command is not a builtin, we use the regular
config machinery (meaning: discovering
Hi Brandon,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Git has this feature where suggests similar commands (including aliases)
>
> nit: s/where/which/
>
> > in case that the user specified an unknown command.
>
> s/that//
Oh my. Thank you so much!
On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Git has this feature where suggests similar commands (including aliases)
nit: s/where/which/
> in case that the user specified an unknown command.
s/that//
>
> This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
> aliases right now: when
Git has this feature where suggests similar commands (including aliases)
in case that the user specified an unknown command.
This feature currently relies on a side effect of the way we expand
aliases right now: when a command is not a builtin, we use the regular
config machinery (meaning:
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Konstantin Podsvirov wrote:
> 06.06.2017, 21:25, "Stefan Beller" <sbel...@google.com>:
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Konstantin Podsvirov
> > <konstan...@podsvirov.pro> wrote:
> >> Reproduction:
> >> - Start
06.06.2017, 21:25, "Stefan Beller" <sbel...@google.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Konstantin Podsvirov
> <konstan...@podsvirov.pro> wrote:
>> Reproduction:
>> - Start git gui
>> - Go to menu panel: Help > About Git Gui
&g
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Konstantin Podsvirov
<konstan...@podsvirov.pro> wrote:
> Reproduction:
> - Start git gui
> - Go to menu panel: Help > About Git Gui
>
> Output:
> error: git-gui died of signal 11
>
> Environment:
> Debian 8 jessie amd6
Reproduction:
- Start git gui
- Go to menu panel: Help > About Git Gui
Output:
error: git-gui died of signal 11
Environment:
Debian 8 jessie amd64 KDE
--
Regards,
Konstantin Podsvirov
Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
is not reentrant.
Mark the variable as static to indicate that this is a singleton.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Desjardin, Donald
wrote:
> Sorry if this is not the place for this.
>
> I'm looking for any reference to potential problems when updating a git
> client (say from 1.7.N to 1.8.N) with old workspaces.
>
> The scenario is this:
>
Sorry if this is not the place for this.
I'm looking for any reference to potential problems when updating a git client
(say from 1.7.N to 1.8.N) with old workspaces.
The scenario is this:
Lots of developers use a single machine for work
They have lots of workspaces created
Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
is not reentrant.
Mark the variable as static to indicate that this is a singleton.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
> > be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
> > is not reentrant.
> >
> >
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
> be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
> is not reentrant.
>
> Mark the variable as static to indicate that this is a singleton.
>
>
Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
is not reentrant.
Mark the variable as static to indicate that this is a singleton.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
Coverity reported a memory leak in this function. However, it can only
be called once, as setup_git_directory() changes global state and hence
is not reentrant.
Mark the variable as static to indicate that this is a singleton.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
patch does
for help), and you'd get:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-old
+new
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,/,e,?]? j
No next hunk
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,/,e,?]?
at which point you could "r" to redisplay it if you wanted to.
This seems good too. But, I guess, the help menu would probably hid
201 - 300 of 959 matches
Mail list logo