Re: t9128 failing randomly with svn 1.9?

I wrote: > The 'git svn' tests are not run in Travis because the perl > subversion bindings are not installed. I haven't made time > to try installing them and running the tests in Travis to > see if the failures occur there, but I suspect they would. Before anyone spends time wondering about

Re: t9128 failing randomly with svn 1.9?

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:06:27PM +, Eric Wong wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote: > diff --git a/git-svn.perl b/git-svn.perl > index 76a75d0b3d..2ba14269bb 100755 > --- a/git-svn.perl > +++ b/git-svn.perl > @@ -1200,6 +1200,11 @@ sub cmd_branch { > $ctx->copy($src, $rev,

Re: t9128 failing randomly with svn 1.9?

Eric Wong wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote: > Just a guess, but it might be related to destruction order. > Running t9128 on a 32-bit Pentium-M, it took me 39 tries to > fail. > > diff --git a/git-svn.perl b/git-svn.perl > index 76a75d0b3d..2ba14269bb 100755 > --- a/git-svn.perl >

Re: t9128 failing randomly with svn 1.9?

Todd Zullinger wrote: > brian m. carlson wrote: > > r7 = f8467f2cee3bcead03e84cb51cf44f467a87457d > > (refs/remotes/origin/tags/tag3) > > error: git-svn died of signal 11 > > > > Doing the following three times, I had two crashes. > > > > (set -e; for i in $(seq 1 20); do (cd t

Re: t9128 failing randomly with svn 1.9?

brian m. carlson wrote: > While running tests for my object_id part 11 series, I noticed a random > segfault in git svn while running t9128. I've reproduced this on a > different machine as well, using both Subversion 1.9.5 and 1.9.7 (Debian > stable and unstable). It is reproducible on master.