Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
The next patch will document gitk -L, but gitk does not understand the
separated form ('gitk -L :foo:bar' results in an error). Spell
git-blame and git-log -L, which are supposed to be the same option,
without
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
From: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch
The -G option's usage is exactly analogous to that of -S, so
supporting it is easy.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch
---
gitk-git/gitk | 2 +-
You CC'ed
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for your patch.
You should Cc Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org on gitk patches.
Nicolas Cornu nco...@aldebaran-robotics.com writes:
From b3570290bd761a1bf952ea491fa62b123231fe61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Cornu nco...@aldebaran-robotics.com
Date: Tue, 29 Oct
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:07:50PM +0100, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
Changes since V2:
clear_ssh and expect_ssh did come back
And I couldn't get it working without the
$TRASH_DIRECTORY/ssh-output
Thanks.
test_when_finished:
I could not get that to work. Probably because of the
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:35:17AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
index 752f5cb..2b4b9a9 100755
[...]
+test_atom head *objectname ''
+test_atom head *objecttype ''
[...]
+test_atom tag
Just a heads-up: This patch breaks t5601 totally on Windows. Test #4, a
local clone via file: protocol, fails already. I'm investigating now.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:19:56PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
Maybe squash this in some place, or leave it separate. I'm fine either way.
Thanks, this makes sense. I've left it as a separate commit.
Your subject did not quite make sense to me, as the effect is to _not_
report .bitmap
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:12:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I think it was just a simple mixup caused by Brian sending two fixups to
t5570 as series, when they are really fixups for two different topics.
Not worth an immediate v1.8.4.3, I think, but you may want to
cherry-pick 360a326
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:22:07AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
However, the code in the ewah/ directory has been hacked up a bit
from its original, and ewah_io.c _does_ include git-compat-util.h.
So it may make sense to consider our copy a fork and git-ify it
more.
Am 10/29/2013 22:07, schrieb Torsten Bögershausen:
@@ -610,17 +623,17 @@ struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], const char
*url_orig,
} else
end = host;
- path = strchr(end, c);
- if (path !has_dos_drive_prefix(end)) {
- if (c == ':') {
-
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:14:16PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
If it's not mentioned yet, maybe you should note that this code
currently supports only one pack with .bitmap file.
Yes, there's really not any point in having multiple .bitmap files, as
the bitmaps need to be closed over
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:25:14PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a normal `pack-objects` from
`upload-pack` would do).
2. There must be a .bitmap index containing at least one of the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:13:47PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
+ for i in `test_seq 1 10`; do
+ test_commit side-$i
+ done
Sorry, style nitpick: could you rewrite this command substitution
using $() like a few lines above?
That is a nitpick. :P
But sure, I've squashed it
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-10-29 14:50, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
Lot of code isn't problem, see Linux kernel or GCC, or LibreOffice.org
OK, it depends on how much code is too much for you. I'm not talking
about performance of git, just disk
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:47:06PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
I think Colby and I talked about having additional optional sections
in this file, but Colby didn't want to overcomplicate the format early
on. So v1 is probably not very extensible and we may have to go to v2
to safely create
Andrew,
Shallow clone (if that's what you meant) is not suitable because it
doesn't allow to push/pull to/from this shallow repository.
I understand that generally git is designed to preserve the history.
But the problem is real, and probably is not unique to our project.
The fact that there
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:55:13PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
As an extra optimization, when `prepare_bitmap_walk` succeeds, the
`reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap` call can be attempted: it will find
the amount of objects at the beginning of the on-disk packfile that can
be reused
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:00:48PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Note that most of the time we spend for --count invocations is on
generating the pack revindex. It may be worth storing a revidx (either
in a separate file, as
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:14:11PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a normal `pack-objects` from
`upload-pack` would do).
2.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
typo: ntohll
Thanks.
function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
swaps of 64-bit data. These 64-bit swaps are necessary for the on-disk
Perl 5.18 randomizes the seed used by its hash function, so iterating
through hashes results in different orders from run to run:
http://perldoc.perl.org/perl5180delta.html#Hash-overhaul
This usually broke t9400 (gitcvs.dbname, gitcvs.ext.dbname, when
running cmp on two .sqlite files) and t9402
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:36:37AM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
if (large_request) {
+ long authtype = 0;
+
Minor nit, but this will produce an unused variable warning if the code
in the #if below doesn't get compiled. I don't know how much we care.
+#if
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I didn't see this in the latest What's cooking, so here's a resend, with
an expanded commit message to reflect our discussion. The patch itself is
unchanged.
Thanks, your expanded description looks correct to me.
In order to fix
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:19:27AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
To achieve this, I guess we have to follow the same procedure we do for
loose object creation:
1. Create a temporary directory with a unique name (mkdtemp?)
2. Adjust permissions
3. Rename into place
Can this be
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:47:06PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
I think Colby and I talked about having additional optional sections
in this file, but Colby didn't want to overcomplicate the format early
on. So v1 is probably
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:55:13PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Yay! This is similar to the optimization we use in JGit to send the
entire pack, but the part about sending a leading prefix is new. Do
you have any data showing
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:25:14PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a normal `pack-objects` from
`upload-pack` would do).
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:14:11PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a
Michael Haggerty wrote:
git fetch was being used with contrived refspecs to create tags and
remote-tracking branches in test repositories in preparation for the
actual tests. This is obscure and also makes one wonder whether this
is indeed just preparation or whether some side-effect of git
This scrollbar is not optional and is useful if there is a lot of tags or
branches.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cornu nco...@aldebaran-robotics.com
---
gitk | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gitk b/gitk
index 5cd00d8..62563b1 100755
--- a/gitk
+++ b/gitk
@@
Michael Haggerty wrote:
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index e42daa8..a5e6c7f 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -825,6 +825,8 @@ static int query_refspecs(struct refspec *refs, int
ref_count, struct refspec *q
{
int i;
int find_src = !query-src;
+ const
Am 10/30/2013 11:58, schrieb Nicolas Cornu:
This scrollbar is not optional and is useful if there is a lot of tags or
branches.
If this is the only case where the scrollbar is useful, i.e., it would
be handy only once every other week, then it is better to remember that
you can pan around in
Eccellenza del lusso
dirett...@fashionvipmagazine.com
mailto:dirett...@fashionvipmagazine.com
http://www.fashionvipmagazine.com
http://www.fashionvipmagazine.com
http://www.fashionvipmagazine.com
--
If you do not want to receive any more newsletters,
This is useful on all our repos, every times, as we put a tag per day.
If the HEAD didn't move during 150 days, we got 150 tags.
So, it depends, maybe can I put it as an option in Edit Preferences?
2013/10/30 Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net:
Am 10/30/2013 11:58, schrieb Nicolas Cornu:
This
Hi all,
With gitk --first-parent, I get a graph that only follows the first
parent of every merge---perfect if you always merge topic branches
into the main branch. However, the diff shown is still the normal
merge diff, and not the diff between the new tree and the first
parent's tree---is it
Karl Wiberg k...@treskal.com wrote:
With gitk --first-parent, I get a graph that only follows the first
parent of every merge---perfect if you always merge topic branches
into the main branch. However, the diff shown is still the normal
merge diff, and not the diff between the new tree and
On 13-10-30 08:47 AM, Nicolas Cornu wrote:
This is useful on all our repos, every times, as we put a tag per day.
If the HEAD didn't move during 150 days, we got 150 tags.
So, it depends, maybe can I put it as an option in Edit Preferences?
Eek, even with a scrollbar, 150 tags seems like a
2013/10/30 Marc Branchaud marcn...@xiplink.com:
On 13-10-30 08:47 AM, Nicolas Cornu wrote:
This is useful on all our repos, every times, as we put a tag per day.
If the HEAD didn't move during 150 days, we got 150 tags.
So, it depends, maybe can I put it as an option in Edit Preferences?
On 13-10-30 10:49 AM, Nicolas Cornu wrote:
2013/10/30 Marc Branchaud marcn...@xiplink.com:
On 13-10-30 08:47 AM, Nicolas Cornu wrote:
This is useful on all our repos, every times, as we put a tag per day.
If the HEAD didn't move during 150 days, we got 150 tags.
So, it depends, maybe can I
DimanNe dima...@ya.ru writes:
What does your config look like now?
[core]
repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = true
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
[svn-remote svn]
url = https://some_host/trunk/
fetch = :refs/remotes/git-svn
Nicolas Cornu nco...@aldebaran-robotics.com writes:
From 1cbc2c49454581a67cce09ada1386dac4ffa2828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Cornu nco...@aldebaran-robotics.com
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:31:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add option --no-tags
---
gitk-git/gitk | 13 ++---
1
On 2013-10-30 08:44, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jakub Narębskijna...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-10-29 14:50, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
If they are independent projects, they should get independent repositories;
you can stitch them back together using
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:39:02PM +0100, Jakub Narębski wrote:
From time to time you can find there ideas about adding floating
mode to git-submodule, but as far as I know up till now without
effect...
How about git submodule update --remote ?
--
Med vänliga hälsningar
Fredrik Gustafsson
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
In fact, I'm not quite sure that even a partial reuse up to an offset is
100% safe. In a newly packed git repo it is, because we always put bases
before deltas (and OFS_DELTA objects need this). But if you had a bitmap
generated
On 2013-10-30 08:52, Stas Cherkassky wrote:
Shallow clone (if that's what you meant) is not suitable because it
doesn't allow to push/pull to/from this shallow repository.
Still? I think there were some work on making shallow clone to
allowing push/pull to/from it.
I understand that
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org wrote:
Since (1) is relatively rare, I think we are using this as a proxy for
(2), so that we can do a regular walk rather than looking around for
bitmaps that don't exist. But I may be misremembering the reasoning.
Vicent?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:47:06PM +, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
I think Colby and I talked about having additional optional sections
in this file, but
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Vicent Marti vic...@github.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
In fact, I'm not quite sure that even a partial reuse up to an offset is
100% safe. In a newly packed git repo it is, because we always put bases
before
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org wrote:
The name-hash cache is probably important, but it would be nice to
have a variable or flag we can use to disable the name-cache
generation and thus permit Git to create JGit style v1 indexes, and
also use JGit v1 indexes
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-10-30 08:52, Stas Cherkassky wrote:
Shallow clone (if that's what you meant) is not suitable because it
doesn't allow to push/pull to/from this shallow repository.
Still? I think there were some work on
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
I figured this was easier on potential testers. As outlined in the
cover letter, I'll do the splitting and rebasing later.
Sorry, I should have read 0/7 before responding, but the message
came out of order.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 2013-10-28 20.28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/pack-bitmap (2013-10-28) 20 commits
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
$ git diff
diff --git a/compat/bswap.h b/compat/bswap.h
index ea1a9ed..8dc39be 100644
--- a/compat/bswap.h
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
If Cygwin declares its own bswap_64, wouldn't it be better to use it
instead of overwriting it with our own?
--
On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
typo: ntohll
Thanks.
function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
swaps of 64-bit
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
The next patch will document gitk -L, but gitk does not understand the
separated form ('gitk -L :foo:bar' results in an error). Spell
git-blame and git-log -L, which are
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Stefan Haller li...@haller-berlin.de wrote:
I once posted a patch that adds a First parent checkbox to gitk's
window:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/160920
The patch no longer applies today, but I can send an updated version
that
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
If Cygwin declares its own bswap_64, wouldn't it be better to use it
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
+ format_commit_message(commit, Fixes: %h ('%s')\n, sb, ctx);
What is the value of double wrapping the commit message inside '...'
and then ('...')?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 10/30/2013 12:05 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index e42daa8..a5e6c7f 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -825,6 +825,8 @@ static int query_refspecs(struct refspec *refs, int
ref_count, struct refspec *q
{
int i;
Anders Kaseorg ande...@mit.edu writes:
Perl 5.18 randomizes the seed used by its hash function, so iterating
through hashes results in different orders from run to run:
http://perldoc.perl.org/perl5180delta.html#Hash-overhaul
This usually broke t9400 (gitcvs.dbname, gitcvs.ext.dbname, when
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:35:17AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
...
Can you quote the *? I may have become somewhat paranoid, but still.
This is the first use of the *field syntax, and test_atom seems
written to correctly quote its arguments, so why risk it? :-)
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:19:56PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
Maybe squash this in some place, or leave it separate. I'm fine either way.
Thanks, this makes sense. I've left it as a separate commit.
Your subject did not quite make sense to me, as
On 2013-10-30 18.14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
If Cygwin declares
Ben Walton bdwal...@gmail.com writes:
Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
see string2 padded to the length of string1 using
On 10/30/2013 11:57 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:
git fetch was being used with contrived refspecs to create tags and
remote-tracking branches in test repositories in preparation for the
actual tests. This is obscure and also makes one wonder whether this
is indeed
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:03:53PM +0100, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
I just gave it a try and it works nicely:
Tested-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
Also, the clean target already contains *.html, so nothing else to
do there. Any chance to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch wrote:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
But I still don't see exactly what this option should do (inside git
commit) that would end up being useful across most/all projects, and
not just something that could more easily be
Karl Wiberg k...@treskal.com writes:
With gitk --first-parent, I get a graph that only follows the first
parent of every merge---perfect if you always merge topic branches
into the main branch. However, the diff shown is still the normal
merge diff, and not the diff between the new tree and
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:29:32PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
A hook-based solution could do this. But a built-in all-purpose
handler like footer.Fixes.arg=commit, which was intended to be
reusable, wouldn't be able to do
Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
+ format_commit_message(commit, Fixes: %h ('%s')\n, sb,
ctx);
What is the value of double wrapping the commit message inside '...'
and then ('...')?
Good point
I'm trying to clone an svn repository to git in preparation for a migration to
git, including all branches and tags.
The clone is taking a long time, and it looks like every time it detects a
possible branch point it backs up and reprocesses a bunch of old commits. For
example:
r43224 =
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I agree that this patch may reduce confusion locally, but if we were
to go in this direction, we should be consistent and enforce stuck
form everywhere,
Hmm. Do you
Eunsuk Kang esk...@csail.mit.edu writes:
My understanding was that running git rm on a file will delete
all ancestors of the file that are empty directories from the file
system.
Not really.
We do recurse up to see if a/b/ and then a/ has become a useless
empty directory when we did remove
On 30/10/13 17:14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
If Cygwin declares its
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Johan Herland jo...@herland.net wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
If git commit processes these arguments and puts the
On 30/10/13 17:39, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot
Ben Walton bdwal...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Ben Walton bdwal...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh b/t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh
index 3fb4b97..0126154 100755
--- a/t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh
+++
Hi,
I need some advice about creating the git command alias:
I have this as the command:
git log --pretty=format:%h %ad %ae %s --date=short | sed 's/@\S*//g'
The purpose is to cut off the email domain and keep only username.
I'm trying to create this as the alias:
lg = !sh -c 'git log
Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch writes:
So my short-term plan just became: document instead of fix; clean up
manpages towards the stuck form for long options; have gitk only parse
-Lstuck.
Medium term we can move gitk to a different option parser, resolving at
least that inconsistency.
Have you tried backslash escaping the backslash? double escaping?
I don't know how many are required, but I would try first \S, then
\\S, then S, etc
Regards,
Andrew Ardill
On 30 October 2013 12:34, Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need some advice about creating the git
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Ardill andrew.ard...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried backslash escaping the backslash? double escaping?
I don't know how many are required, but I would try first \S, then
\\S, then S, etc
Regards,
Andrew Ardill
When i do that it stops
lg=!git log --pretty=format:'%h %ad %ae %s' --date=short | sed 's/@\\S*//g'
should work.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need some advice about creating the git command alias:
I have this as the command:
git log --pretty=format:%h %ad %ae %s
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:28:08PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
One other criterion I should have mentioned: we must be using the
internal rev-list. That prevented us in v1.8.4.1 and earlier from using
bitmaps for shallow fetches. But as of v1.8.4.2, we always use
pack-objects'
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com wrote:
lg=!git log --pretty=format:'%h %ad %ae %s' --date=short | sed 's/@\\S*//g'
should work.
It did! thanks! I didn't know that !sh -c is not needed
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:47:57PM +0100, Vicent Martí wrote:
Yes, our pack writing and bitmap code takes enough precautions to
arrange the objects in the packfile in a way that can be partially
reused, so for any given bitmap file written from Git, I'd say we're
safe to always reuse the
On 2013-10-30 20.06, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 30/10/13 17:14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works
Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com wrote:
lg=!git log --pretty=format:'%h %ad %ae %s' --date=short | sed 's/@\\S*//g'
should work.
It did! thanks! I didn't know that !sh -c is not needed
sh -c is often used when you
On 30/10/13 20:30, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 20.06, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 30/10/13 17:14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de
wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes:
- describe when it is still applicable
- tell people where to go for most normal cases
Signed-off-by: Sitaram Chamarty sita...@atc.tcs.com
---
ref:
An early preview Git v1.8.5-rc0 is now available for testing at the
usual places.
The release tarballs are found at:
http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
and their SHA-1 checksums are:
591a2397df1bd14ea010df6980026d64df7f9653 git-1.8.5.rc0.tar.gz
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
An early preview 1.8.5-rc0 has been tagged. There still are handful
of fixes and enhancements left in 'next' that I'd like to see in the
final,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:45:10AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
However, we do reuse the curl handles. And in the case of rpc case, we
are only doing one request at a time, so the handle you get is
guaranteed to be the last one used. So it works in practice, but it
would break if the curl handle
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com wrote:
lg=!git log --pretty=format:'%h %ad %ae %s' --date=short | sed 's/@\\S*//g'
should work.
It did!
Eugene Sajine eugu...@gmail.com writes:
That was my initial intention, because I would like to be able to pass
parameters like to git log or git blame correctly without the explicit
use of $1. Could you please advise about how to make it work with the
!sh -c ?
Because the same exact (sed
94 matches
Mail list logo
