-Original Message-
From: Andreas Schwab
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:12 AM
Sergey Sharybin sergey@gmail.com writes:
So guess we just need to recommend using https:// protocol instead of
git:// for our users?
Given how easy it is to verify the integrity of a git
That is a new detail (SMB 1 vs. 2) that can be used to debug this further.
-Original Message-
From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Wiffen
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 11:48 AM
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: trouble on windows
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:51 PM
snip/
I would think. You might have a funny chicken-and-egg problem with
the signed commit, though. I didn't think that part through.
Respectfully, I do not think there is a chicken and egg
-Original Message-
From: Jeff King
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:24 AM
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:42:41AM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
There are some work being done to optimize this further using
various techniques, but they are not ready yet.
And this still
-Original Message-
From: Jeff King
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:57 PM
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:45:44PM +, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
wrote:
If the rules of engagement are change a bit, the server side can be
release from most of its work (CPU/IO).
Client does
We have systems hosting git which are behind proxies, and unless the client
sets the http.postBuffer to a large size they connections fails.
Is there a way to set this on the server side? If not would a patch be possible
to fix this?
jason.pyeron@hostname /home/jason.pyeron/desktop/projectname
Cygwin git? Are you also using a WD NAS?
Cygwin, yes. I am going to spend some time (likely this weekend) to get the
current version to compile on Cygwin.
WD NAS, no. Windows Server 2008 with NTFS file system on internal raid.
David
-Original Message-
From: Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Rast
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:42 AM
David Goldfarb d...@degel.com writes:
Git works correctly under Linux (Ubuntu 12.04; git 1.7.9.5). I've
attached the strace outputs. (Note: for reasons that are probably
irrelevant, I needed to run the
J CTR (US)
wrote:
I am having trouble when the .git folder is on a network share, given
the below where should I start on my debugging?
[...]
jason.pyeron@localhost //server/share/dir/subdir/test
$ git add test.txt
jason.pyeron@localhost //server/share/dir/subdir/test
$ git commit
I am having trouble when the .git folder is on a network share, given the below
where should I start on my debugging?
$ git --version
git version 1.7.9
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 LNDLE642FX7ZTR1 1.7.17(0.262/5/3) 2012-10-19 14:39 i686
Cygwin
jason.pyeron@localhost
-Original Message-
From: Eric Chamberland
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:31 AM
On 01/17/2013 09:23 AM, Philippe Vaucher wrote:
Anyone has a new idea?
Did you try Jeff King's code to confirm his idea?
Philippe
Yes I did, but it was running without any problem
Sorry, I am in cygwin mode, and I had crossed wires in my head.
s/ProcessMon/strace/
-Original Message-
From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Maxime Boissonneault
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:41 AM
To: Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
Cc
I am trying to accomplish the diagram below:
* ??? Merge (or cherry-pick) all changes after 68fb8df from the task1prep
branch?
|\
|* ??? Change ...
|* ??? Change 3
|* ??? Change 2
|* ??? Change 1
|* ??? Merge branch 'task1' into task1prep
||\
|| * 5e51e26 v1.01 - fixed a
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 2:29 AM
Jason Pyeron writes:
[administrivia: please never cull CC list when you respond to a
message on this list without a good reason]
Apologies, I just have 4 copies of every message and was trying to save
-Original Message-
From: Jeff King
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 11:20 PM
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:32:09PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
When doing a clone by https (reverse proxied to http) the first
request is
GET /git/project/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack
How
From: Martin Fick
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:53 PM
Any thoughts on this idea? Is it flawed? I am trying to
write it up in a more formal generalized manner and was
hoping to get at least one it seems sane before I do.
If you are assuming that atomic renames, etc. are available,
-Original Message-
From: Simon Oosthoek
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:08 PM
* Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com [2012-12-26 12:35:28 -0800]:
Anyway, I could imagine this as optional flag of git format-patch,
so you could say:
$ git format-patch -s --in-reply-to-email
-Original Message-
From: David Michael
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:23 AM
Hi,
I've been experimenting with git running on z/OS USS. It is not yet
stable, but I have had to make a few fixes and generalizations in the
build system to get it to compile.
Maybe it would
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Bögershausen
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:19 PM
On 11.12.12 23:30, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Marc Branchaud marcn...@xiplink.com writes:
My point is that the initial checkout into an empty working
directory should
create all files
-Original Message-
From: Liu Liu
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 2:52 AM
Hi,
I am reaching out because in my personal project (
https://github.com/liuliu/ccv
), I used the block sha1 implementation (
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/block-sha1/sha1.c) in git. It is
a
-Original Message-
From: Eric S. Raymond
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:48 PM
Because I do a lot of work on repository conversion tools, I've had
to learn a lot of detail about ontological mismatches between
version-control systems - especially places where you lose metadata
I may need to be nudged in a better direction, but please try to understand my
intentions.
I am facing a situation where I would like to use git bundle but at the same
time inspect the contents to prevent a spillage[1].
Given we have a public repository which was cloned on to a secret
Left off a citation to an old thread.
-Original Message-
From: Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:25 PM
I may need to be nudged in a better direction, but please try to
understand my intentions.
I am facing a situation where I would like to use git bundle
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Contreras
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:20 PM
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
jason.j.pyeron@mail.mil wrote:
I may need to be nudged in a better direction, but please try to
understand my intentions.
I am
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:38 PM
Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US) writes:
In this situation we should assume that the bundle does not have
any content which is already in the public repository, that is it
has the minimum data to make
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Bash
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:56 PM
- Original Message -
From: Jason J CTR Pyeron (US)
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:24:54 PM
Subject: git bundle format
I am facing a situation where I would like to use git bundle but
-Original Message-
From: Javier Domingo
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:15 PM
Hi Andrew,
Doing this would require I got tracked which one comes from which. So
it would imply some logic (and db) over it. With the hardlinking way,
it wouldn't require anything. The idea is
-Original Message-
From: Angelo Borsotti
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:51 AM
Hi Junio,
It would conceptually be a lot cleaner to treat updating of remote
Ibranch description as a separate repository management class of
Ioperation, similar to setting the repository
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Bögershausen
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:45 PM
* ml/cygwin-mingw-headers (2012-11-12) 1 commit
- Update cygwin.c for new mingw-64 win32 api headers
Make git work on newer cygwin.
Will merge to 'next'.
(Sorry for late answer, I
-Original Message-
From: Jeff King
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:29 PM
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 01:09:02PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
My google fu has failed me on this issue. I am trying to setup
http(s)
repositories for git. If I require authenticated users then git
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Contreras
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:44 AM
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org
wrote:
I've been pretty impressed with git's test framework, and I'm not
aware of many other (decent) shell-based test frameworks
Maybe I lost sight of your problem. Can you give a specific example of where
it does not work?
-Original Message-
From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Josef Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 2:51 PM
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:
32 matches
Mail list logo
