On 07 Dec 2015, at 19:51, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015, Lars Schneider wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch! Do you see a way to demonstrate the bug in a test case
>> similar to t9821 [1]?
>
> Not yet, I'm afraid. It's proving trickier than expected because for
>
On 8 December 2015 at 11:41, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
>> > Would a refactor of lib-git-p4.sh (and probably all git-p4 tests) to
>> > support multiple depots be acceptable and/or welcome? I prefer to ask
>> > before I dig into the task.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015, Lars Schneider wrote:
> > Would a refactor of lib-git-p4.sh (and probably all git-p4 tests) to
> > support multiple depots be acceptable and/or welcome? I prefer to ask
> > before I dig into the task.
>
> Can you outline your idea a bit? Are you aware of the following way
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015, Lars Schneider wrote:
> Thanks for the patch! Do you see a way to demonstrate the bug in a test case
> similar to t9821 [1]?
Not yet, I'm afraid. It's proving trickier than expected because for
now I can only reproduce the bug when the view uses multiples depots
Thanks for the patch! Do you see a way to demonstrate the bug in a test case
similar to t9821 [1]?
Cheers,
Lars
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/t/t9821-git-p4-path-variations.sh
> On 05 Dec 2015, at 12:22, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>
> When submitting from a repository
When submitting from a repository that was cloned using a client spec,
use the full list of paths when ruling out files that are outside the
view. This fixes a bug where only files pertaining to the first path
would be included in the p4 submit.
Signed-off-by: Sam Hocevar
---
6 matches
Mail list logo