lewiszlw opened a new pull request, #10576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10576
## Which issue does this PR close?
part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9637.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this
LorrensP-2158466 commented on issue #10571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10571#issuecomment-2119941766
I don't see this as a really difficult API change. Is it ok if I do this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
lewiszlw opened a new pull request, #10577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10577
## Which issue does this PR close?
Renaming like `SchemaProvider::table_names`, add docs and remove deprecated
code.
## Rationale for this change
## What chan
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #10578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10578
Updates the requirements on [prost-build](https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost)
to permit the latest version.
Commits
https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost/commit/d42c85e790263f78f6
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1606501759
##
datafusion/substrait/tests/cases/roundtrip_logical_plan.rs:
##
@@ -607,6 +608,15 @@ async fn qualified_catalog_schema_table_reference() ->
Result<()> {
r
alamb commented on issue #9929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9929#issuecomment-2120223824
Update here is that I found it was maybe too large a step to get to the row
level access initially -- instead I started with a basic example of building a
*file level index* -- htt
alamb commented on code in PR #10527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10527#discussion_r1606615253
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/single_distinct_to_groupby.rs:
##
@@ -131,177 +126,190 @@ fn contains_grouping_set(expr: &[Expr]) -> bool {
impl OptimizerRule for Singl
peter-toth commented on PR #10543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10543#issuecomment-2120329963
I'm still working on an alternative to this PR and will need a couple of
more days to test a few different ideas...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
ozankabak commented on PR #10543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10543#issuecomment-2120338004
No worries. Will be happy to review and help iterate once you are ready
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
vidyasankarv commented on PR #383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/383#issuecomment-2120433348
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/suites/23883332179/logs?attempt=2
In the logs for ubuntu-latest/java 17-spark-3.4-scala-2.12/java - which
included the fuzz te
alamb commented on issue #10571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10571#issuecomment-2120463462
> I don't see this as a really difficult API change. Is it ok if I do this?
Edit: there is a PR already,did not see it, sorry.
@lewiszlw beats us to it!
(BTW
therealsharath commented on PR #707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/707#issuecomment-2120466027
@dependabot rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/707#issuecomment-2120466102
Sorry, only users with push access can use that command.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
therealsharath commented on PR #707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/707#issuecomment-2120467630
Hello, is it possible to merge this in because
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5589 was fixed in object store
`0.10.1`. Thanks!
--
This is an automated messag
aditanase commented on issue #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9280#issuecomment-2120467689
I was recently trying to query the NYC dataset from ballista. Path looks
something like
https://d37ci6vzurychx.cloudfront.net/trip-data/yellow_tripdata_2024-01.parquet
alamb merged PR #10555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10555
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #10521: `GroupingSet` Expr --> String Support
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10521
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
alamb commented on issue #9726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9726#issuecomment-2120522626
With the completion of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10555 from
@xinlifoobar I think this epic is now done!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
alamb closed issue #9726: Complete support for `Expr --> String `
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9726
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
viirya merged PR #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/445
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
viirya commented on PR #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/445#issuecomment-2120582785
Merged. Thanks @andygrove @advancedxy
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1601980707
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer.rs:
##
@@ -165,6 +168,53 @@ pub fn to_substrait_rel(
}))),
}))
}
+
Michael-J-Ward commented on PR #678:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/678#issuecomment-2120634135
@andygrove could we merge this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
viirya commented on code in PR #2:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-benchmarks/pull/2#discussion_r1606905078
##
tpch/tpchgen.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE
comphead commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606905348
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1402,69 @@ fn get_filter_column(
filter_columns
}
+/// Get `buffered_indices` row
comphead commented on PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#issuecomment-2120655736
> I've seen some issues in this patch. It doesn't look like a correct fix.
The tests currently in sync with what hash join returns, is there a test
showing the opposite?
--
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606910619
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1402,69 @@ fn get_filter_column(
filter_columns
}
+/// Get `buffered_indices` rows
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606910619
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1402,69 @@ fn get_filter_column(
filter_columns
}
+/// Get `buffered_indices` rows
alamb commented on issue #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9280#issuecomment-2120680185
@aditanase how are you running the external statement?
It seems to work well from `datafusion-cli`
```shell
andrewlamb@Andrews-MacBook-Pro-2:~/Software/datafusion
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606924344
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1402,69 @@ fn get_filter_column(
filter_columns
}
+/// Get `buffered_indices` rows
alamb merged PR #10561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10561
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #10521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10521#issuecomment-2120689989
Thanks again @xinlifoobar
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
Michael-J-Ward commented on code in PR #710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710#discussion_r1606931001
##
.github/workflows/test.yaml:
##
@@ -111,3 +134,9 @@ jobs:
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -e . -vv
pytest -v .
+
Michael-J-Ward commented on code in PR #710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710#discussion_r1606931001
##
.github/workflows/test.yaml:
##
@@ -111,3 +134,9 @@ jobs:
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -e . -vv
pytest -v .
+
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606942756
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -989,8 +996,21 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
Ordering::Equal =>
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606944266
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -989,8 +996,21 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
Ordering::Equal =>
viirya commented on code in PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#discussion_r1606948252
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -989,8 +996,21 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
Ordering::Equal =>
alamb opened a new issue, #10579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10579
Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10482
My (personal) North ⭐ : 1000 projects are built using DataFusion 📈
**It would be great for other contributors to DataFusion wh
alamb commented on issue #10482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10482#issuecomment-2120727825
Next week: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10579
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
alamb closed issue #10482: DataFusion weekly project plan (Andrew Lamb) - May
13, 2024
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10482
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
viirya commented on PR #10304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10304#issuecomment-2120729543
> I've seen some issues in this patch. It doesn't look like a correct fix.
Took another look. Looks okay to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
alamb opened a new issue, #10580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10580
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
It is common in databases and other analytic system to have additional
external "indexes" (perhaps stored in the "metadata catalog",
alamb merged PR #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.
alamb commented on PR #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/3#issuecomment-2120752894
🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
alamb commented on issue #10565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10565#issuecomment-2120754098
Thank you @jayzhan211 🙏 -- I will review it now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
alamb commented on code in PR #10568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10568#discussion_r1606971468
##
datafusion/core/tests/expr_api/mod.rs:
##
@@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ fn test_eq_with_coercion() {
#[test]
fn test_get_field() {
evaluate_expr_test(
-get_fie
alamb commented on code in PR #10568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10568#discussion_r1606978717
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/expr_ext.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agre
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1606981891
##
datafusion/substrait/tests/cases/roundtrip_logical_plan.rs:
##
@@ -607,6 +608,15 @@ async fn qualified_catalog_schema_table_reference() ->
Result<()> {
r
alamb commented on issue #10557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10557#issuecomment-2120775312
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10392 is the upgrade to sqlparser
-- I think it is pretty close but @tisonkun hit an issue during upgrade.
--
This is an automated mes
alamb commented on issue #2703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2703#issuecomment-2120780299
Hi @leoluan2009
In my opinion, I don't think DataFusion needs JIT to get good performance.
In general, I find the paper ["Everything You Always Wanted to Know About
C
timsaucer commented on code in PR #710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710#discussion_r1606991649
##
.github/workflows/test.yaml:
##
@@ -111,3 +134,9 @@ jobs:
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -e . -vv
pytest -v .
+
+
timsaucer commented on code in PR #710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710#discussion_r1606991649
##
.github/workflows/test.yaml:
##
@@ -111,3 +134,9 @@ jobs:
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -e . -vv
pytest -v .
+
+
tisonkun commented on code in PR #10392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10392#discussion_r1605950326
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/array.slt:
##
Review Comment:
Can be a bug after the JSON path parse changes -
https://github.com/sqlparser-rs/sqlpars
tisonkun commented on issue #10557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10557#issuecomment-2120801283
> #10392 is the upgrade to sqlparser -- I think it is pretty close but
@tisonkun hit an issue during upgrade.
We may need a 0.46.1 for resolving the regressions:
*
parthchandra opened a new issue, #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/452
### Describe the bug
ExtendedExplainInfo is declared as a class, but it can be an object instead.
### Steps to reproduce
_No response_
### Expected behavior
_N
parthchandra commented on code in PR #397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/397#discussion_r1607016398
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/CometSparkSessionExtensions.scala:
##
@@ -734,6 +734,23 @@ class CometSparkSessionExtensions
} else {
andygrove commented on PR #2:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-benchmarks/pull/2#issuecomment-2120828494
Thanks for the review @viirya
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
andygrove merged PR #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-benchmarks/pull/2
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@d
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/451#discussion_r1607045862
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/DataGenerator.scala:
##
@@ -95,4 +102,55 @@ class DataGenerator(r: Random) {
Range(0, n).map(_ => r.next
alamb commented on code in PR #10575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10575#discussion_r1607048271
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/extension.rs:
##
@@ -76,27 +76,20 @@ pub trait UserDefinedLogicalNode: fmt::Debug + Send + Sync {
/// For example: `TopK: k=
alamb commented on PR #10577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10577#issuecomment-2120882095
I'll leave this open for a day as it is an API change, in case anyone else
wants a chance to review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
comphead merged PR #10578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
alamb commented on PR #10564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10564#issuecomment-2120885272
@jayzhan211 has a better fix in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10568
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
alamb closed pull request #10564: Minor: Fix name in ArrayFunctionRewriter,
error not panic if `Expr::GetStructField` is planned
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10564
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
comphead commented on code in PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#discussion_r1607055206
##
datafusion/sql/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ arrow-schema = { workspace = true }
datafusion-common = { workspace = true, default-features = true }
datafus
alamb opened a new pull request, #10581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10581
This confused me while debugging something else
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
alamb commented on code in PR #10567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10567#discussion_r1607060754
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/push_down_filter.rs:
##
@@ -861,16 +861,12 @@ impl OptimizerRule for PushDownFilter {
.collect();
l
alamb merged PR #10558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10558
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #10550: Add an example of how to convert LogicalPlan to/from
SQL Strings
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10550
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
comphead commented on code in PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#discussion_r1607067858
##
datafusion/sql/src/unparser/expr.rs:
##
@@ -504,6 +508,14 @@ impl Unparser<'_> {
.collect::>>()
}
+pub(super) fn new_ident_quoted_if_ne
alamb commented on code in PR #10582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10582#discussion_r1607076013
##
datafusion-examples/examples/plan_to_sql.rs:
##
@@ -22,36 +22,45 @@ use datafusion::sql::unparser::expr_to_sql;
use datafusion_sql::unparser::dialect::CustomDial
viirya opened a new issue, #10583:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10583
### Describe the bug
During working on https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/437, a few
Spark join tests are failed when delegating to DataFusion HashJoin.
It is because that Dat
viirya opened a new pull request, #10584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10584
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10583.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes teste
viirya commented on PR #10584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10584#issuecomment-2120931328
Added the test case first. I will find some time to work on the fix.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
viirya commented on code in PR #10584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10584#discussion_r1607085982
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/join.slt:
##
@@ -793,3 +793,19 @@ DROP TABLE companies
statement ok
DROP TABLE leads
+
+
+# LeftAnti Join with null
+state
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607087345
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607091830
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607104678
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb opened a new issue, #10585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10585
### Describe the bug
As @NGA-TRAN found in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537 when
i8 and i16 values are written to parquet and then the statistics are extracted,
the returned min/m
NGA-TRAN commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607104991
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor
alamb commented on issue #10585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10585#issuecomment-2120956336
Possibly related to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9779
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607107595
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607110465
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb opened a new issue, #10586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10586
### Describe the bug
As @tustvold points out, there is a [`column_order`
API](https://docs.rs/parquet/latest/parquet/file/metadata/struct.FileMetaData.html#method.column_order)
defined in parquet
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607118413
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/physical_plan/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+use arrow_array::ArrayRef;
+use arrow_schema::DataType;
+use datafu
alamb opened a new issue, #10587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10587
### Describe the bug
When reading a Date32 or Date64 column from a parquet file, DataFusion
currently returns an Int32 array
### To Reproduce
You can see the issue in https:/
alamb commented on code in PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#discussion_r1607125587
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,654 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor lic
alamb commented on PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537#issuecomment-2120986025
I have filed the following tickets
* https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10585
* https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10586
* #10587
I think this PR is
twitu closed issue #10572: Row groups are read out of order or with completely
different values
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10572
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
edmondop commented on code in PR #10582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10582#discussion_r1607146553
##
datafusion-examples/examples/plan_to_sql.rs:
##
@@ -22,36 +22,45 @@ use datafusion::sql::unparser::expr_to_sql;
use datafusion_sql::unparser::dialect::CustomD
alamb opened a new pull request, #10588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10588
## Which issue does this PR close?
## Rationale for this change
In an effort to make it faster to develop and test datafusion , it would be
nice if the resources required to run th
alamb commented on code in PR #10588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10588#discussion_r1607149443
##
datafusion/core/tests/custom_sources.rs:
##
@@ -1,308 +0,0 @@
-// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Review Comment:
This was moved to
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/433#discussion_r1607151015
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1452,17 +1452,55 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
A
alamb merged PR #10537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10537
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
edmondop commented on issue #10587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10587#issuecomment-2121024857
@alamb the title here doesn't make much sense, are you saying that the `min`
and `max` are not extracted as Date32/Date64?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
davisp opened a new issue, #10589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10589
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
I've been reading and learning the TableProvider APIs and have finally
gotten around to taking a serious look at implementing suppor
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1607158744
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,46 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Ad
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #422:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/422#discussion_r1607164180
##
docs/source/index.rst:
##
@@ -58,7 +58,11 @@ as a native runtime to achieve improvement in terms of query
efficiency and quer
Comet Plugin Overv
davisp opened a new pull request, #10590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10590
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10589
## Rationale for this change
Provide per-column key/value options in the `CREATE EXTERN TABLE` statement.
## What changes
davisp commented on PR #10590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10590#issuecomment-2121051712
Also, for anyone more familiar with datafusion and/or sqlparser, one thing I
wasn't 100% on was how to represent the metadata value. For now I've just
called format on it, but I have
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
