xinlifoobar commented on issue #10314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10314#issuecomment-2122201906
Hi @alamb, found another interesting case while testing, do you think this
could apply `InterleaveExec` with same order by sets?
```
explain select count(*) from (
Blizzara commented on PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#issuecomment-2122279768
@jonahgao @alamb I think this is ready by me :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608039288
##
datafusion/substrait/tests/cases/roundtrip_logical_plan.rs:
##
@@ -607,6 +608,15 @@ async fn qualified_catalog_schema_table_reference() ->
Result<()> {
r
alamb commented on PR #10581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10581#issuecomment-2122285943
Thanks for the review @jonahgao
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
alamb merged PR #10581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10581
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #10575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10575
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #10571: UserDefindedLogicalNode::from_template does not
return a Result<...>.
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10571
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
alamb commented on code in PR #10575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10575#discussion_r1608050237
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/extension.rs:
##
@@ -76,27 +76,31 @@ pub trait UserDefinedLogicalNode: fmt::Debug + Send + Sync {
/// For example: `TopK: k=
alamb commented on PR #10576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10576#issuecomment-2122297757
> The `CommonSubexprEliminate` rule has not been migrated yet.
That is a good point -- though we could do something like
`#[allow(deprecated)]` until it is. I hope to work on it
alamb merged PR #10576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #10576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10576#issuecomment-2122298090
Thanks again @lewiszlw
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
alamb commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608069310
##
datafusion/expr/src/udf.rs:
##
@@ -426,6 +467,59 @@ pub trait ScalarUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync {
false
}
+/// Computes the output interval f
alamb commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608079456
##
datafusion/functions/src/math/monotonicity.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
alamb closed pull request #10117: improve monotonicity api
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10117
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
alamb commented on PR #10117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10117#issuecomment-2122333403
I believe this PR has been superceded by
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504 which removed the montonicity
apu in favor of a more expressive bounds analysis, so closing thi
alamb closed issue #9879: Request: Improve Monotoniciy API
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
alamb commented on issue #9879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9879#issuecomment-2122335700
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504 introduces a new API for
boundary propagation, so the API challenge described in this ticket is no
longer relevant. Thus closing
--
alamb opened a new issue, #9879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9879
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
While reviewing https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/9869 from
@tinfoil-knight I was confused about the
[`ScalarUDFImpl::mo
alamb closed issue #9879: Request: Improve Monotoniciy API
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608102197
##
datafusion/expr/src/udf.rs:
##
@@ -426,6 +467,59 @@ pub trait ScalarUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync {
false
}
+/// Computes the output in
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608112791
##
datafusion/functions/src/math/monotonicity.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor
alamb commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608116040
##
datafusion/expr/src/udf.rs:
##
@@ -426,6 +467,59 @@ pub trait ScalarUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync {
false
}
+/// Computes the output interval f
berkaysynnada commented on PR #10117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10117#issuecomment-2122357671
> I believe this PR has been superceded by #10504 which removed the
montonicity apu in favor of a more expressive bounds analysis, so closing this
pR
>
> Thanks for the
tinfoil-knight commented on PR #10117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10117#issuecomment-2122366778
No worries @berkaysynnada and @alamb. It's difficult to keep track of
everyone's work in such a large project.
It was fun to work on this and I learnt a few things from
vidyasankarv commented on issue #440:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/440#issuecomment-2122378853
> Is this an issue of just a mismatch between error messages? Or is the cast
actually not doing the right thing with Spark 3.2?
Is an issue with mismatch between e
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/711
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #696
# Rationale for this change
This PR sets up a work flow to generate TPH-C 1Gb data set in CI, runs the
22 examples, and com
timsaucer closed pull request #710: Tsaucer/prepare tpch examples for ci
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
timsaucer commented on PR #710:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/710#issuecomment-2122385949
Closing in favor of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/711
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
timsaucer commented on PR #711:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/711#issuecomment-2122437247
@Michael-J-Ward It looks like we have a _potential_ regression between
37.1.0 and 38.0.0. Namely `substr` on 37.1.0 would accept a start and length,
the parameters that should
goldmedal commented on code in PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#discussion_r1608186038
##
datafusion/sql/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ arrow-schema = { workspace = true }
datafusion-common = { workspace = true, default-features = true }
datafu
goldmedal commented on code in PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#discussion_r1608186725
##
datafusion/sql/src/unparser/expr.rs:
##
@@ -504,6 +508,14 @@ impl Unparser<'_> {
.collect::>>()
}
+pub(super) fn new_ident_quoted_if_n
goldmedal commented on PR #10573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573#issuecomment-2122464482
> Thanks @goldmedal I'm thinking how this will work with whitespaces columns
like
>
> ```
> select 1 as "a a";
> ```
Thanks @comphead :)
I'm not sure what you
goldmedal commented on issue #10557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10557#issuecomment-2122480005
I'm not sure but I think we can merge #10573 first because it also fix many
unpasring tests. Then, I'll create PR for sqlparser to add the check rule in
dialect.
--
This is
berkaysynnada opened a new issue, #10595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10595
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
After merging PR #10504, a new file
[monotonicity.rs](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/functions/src
berkaysynnada opened a new pull request, #10596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10596
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
The signature and usage of the monotonicity API have significantly changed.
The
aditanase commented on issue #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9280#issuecomment-2122637271
@alamb thanks for the very quick reply! Just tested with `datafusion-cli`,
you're right that it's working.
I was trying from a test deployment of Ballista. Will add the object
lewiszlw opened a new pull request, #10597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10597
## Which issue does this PR close?
follow up of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10575.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in t
crepererum commented on code in PR #10593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10593#discussion_r1608400609
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/arrow_statistics.rs:
##
@@ -605,9 +611,6 @@ async fn test_dates_32_diff_rg_sizes() {
.run("date32");
}
-// BUG: same as
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608408244
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1277,7 +1404,84 @@ pub(crate) fn from_substrait_literal(lit: &Literal) ->
Result {
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608413505
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1277,6 +1407,56 @@ pub(crate) fn from_substrait_literal(lit: &Literal) ->
Result {
jonahgao commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608431571
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -505,7 +507,35 @@ pub async fn from_substrait_rel(
_ => Ok(t),
}
matthewmturner opened a new issue, #10599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10599
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
I am working on a websocket `TableProvider` and initially I went about
creating my own `TableProvider` but then after review
matthewmturner opened a new pull request, #10600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10600
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10599
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these chang
matthewmturner commented on PR #10600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10600#issuecomment-2122787433
@metesynnada @mustafasrepo i believe you were both involved in the
`StreamTable` implementation so im interested in getting your views if this is
going in the right direction
Omega359 opened a new pull request, #10601:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10601
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10461
## Rationale for this change
Adding missing documentation
## What changes are included in this PR?
doc
alamb opened a new issue, #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Broken out from @Abdullahsab3's great ticket
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10368
We would like to apply date
alamb commented on issue #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602#issuecomment-2122811703
The way you can perform this binning in postgres is somewhat paradoxically
to convert a timestamp with a timezone back to a timestamp without timezone and
then apply `date_bin`.
edmondop commented on code in PR #10593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10593#discussion_r1608470231
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/physical_plan/parquet/statistics.rs:
##
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ macro_rules! get_statistic {
*scale,
alamb commented on issue #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602#issuecomment-2122823905
If we cast using arrow_cast back to `Timestamp(Nanosecond, None)` the
binning does appear to work correctly
```sql
> create or replace view t_roundtrip as select arrow_ca
peter-toth commented on PR #10543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10543#issuecomment-2122829132
> What do we think about merging this PR and filing a follow on ticket to
unify the APIs?
I'm ok with merging the current state of the PR. But I was also thinking
about how
andygrove commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608493460
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_cou
andygrove commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608498362
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_cou
andygrove commented on PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#issuecomment-2122853631
This is very cool @comphead but it looks like it is not detecting any of the
aggregate functions that we support?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
comphead commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608510461
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_coun
shanretoo commented on issue #6747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6747#issuecomment-2122870652
@timsaucer I have fixed the calls of `expr::WindowFunction` to meet the
changes and add tests for those window functions in `dataframe_functions.rs`.
Let me know if I missed a
phillipleblanc opened a new pull request, #10603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10603
## Which issue does this PR close?
It doesn't close this issue, but is part of the work for #9494
## Rationale for this change
Adds support for turning LogicalPlans that
codecov-commenter commented on PR #292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/292#issuecomment-2122931674
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/292?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campai
NGA-TRAN opened a new issue, #10604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10604
### Describe the bug
I found this bug while adding tests for reading parquet statistics
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592/. Instead of getting
corresponding UInt8Array, UInt16Arr
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608584669
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,46 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
AdaptiveSpa
alamb commented on issue #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602#issuecomment-2122959190
Given the statement in the description, here is the best I can come up with
using `arrow_cast`
```sql
-- Times in brussels
WITH t_brussels
AS (
SELECT
c
huaxingao opened a new pull request, #456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/456
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How are these changes t
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608584669
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,46 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
AdaptiveSpa
comphead commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608597228
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_coun
NGA-TRAN opened a new issue, #10605:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10605
### Describe the bug
I found this while adding tests for reading parquet statistics
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592. Instead of getting back
`BinaryArray`, we get `StringArray`
comphead commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608598651
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_coun
viirya merged PR #395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/395
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
alamb commented on issue #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602#issuecomment-2122975595
@mhilton and I agree that if we had the functionality suggested by
@Abdullahsab3's on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10368#issue-2277903243
> given a UTC ti
viirya commented on PR #395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/395#issuecomment-2122976226
Merged. Thanks @huaxingao @advancedxy @comphead @parthchandra
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
huaxingao commented on PR #395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/395#issuecomment-2122977103
Thanks, everyone!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
alamb commented on issue #10602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602#issuecomment-2122979923
My suggested next steps for this ticket:
1. Someone prototype the "strip_timezone" function as a ScalarUDF and verify
that we can in fact we can achieve the expected result from
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608584669
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,46 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
AdaptiveSpa
viirya commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608605897
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_count_
viirya commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608605897
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_count_
NGA-TRAN commented on issue #10453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10453#issuecomment-2122986254
@alamb I have created 2 more bug tickets but I cannot edit the description
to add them in the subtasks. Can you help with that?
1. https://github.com/apache/datafusion/i
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608610498
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1277,6 +1407,56 @@ pub(crate) fn from_substrait_literal(lit: &Literal) ->
Result {
NGA-TRAN commented on PR #10592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592#issuecomment-2122987903
@alamb : This PR is ready for review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
edmondop commented on issue #10604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10604#issuecomment-2122991483
This seems related to
[this](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10593#discussion_r1608470231)
comment
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
comphead merged PR #10577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10577
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
alamb commented on issue #10368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10368#issuecomment-2122994397
I have filed https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10602 with a
summary of how I understand the usecase of "how do we bin timesamps in
timezones with daylight savings time
tshauck commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608617934
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/scalar_funcs/hex.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608622303
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -505,7 +507,35 @@ pub async fn from_substrait_rel(
_ => Ok(t),
}
Blizzara commented on code in PR #10531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531#discussion_r1608623644
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1277,7 +1404,84 @@ pub(crate) fn from_substrait_literal(lit: &Literal) ->
Result {
alamb opened a new issue, #10606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10606
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10453
Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10453 is to
"ef
comphead commented on code in PR #455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/455#discussion_r1608634043
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+
+
+# Supported Spark Expressions
+
+### agg_funcs
+ - [ ] any
+ - [ ] any_value
+ - [ ] approx_coun
advancedxy commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608635628
##
core/src/execution/datafusion/expressions/scalar_funcs/hex.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or m
NGA-TRAN commented on PR #10592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592#issuecomment-2123026061
@comphead
> What I still cannot understand is this a regression test for the bug we
missed earlier?
I am working on new arrow statistics API
https://github.com/apache
timsaucer commented on issue #6747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6747#issuecomment-2123031753
Oh, great. Have you been able to run the [example code
above](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6747#issuecomment-2090260284)
using the new easy interface?
--
This
andygrove merged PR #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/711
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@d
andygrove closed issue #696: Ensure examples stay updated in CI.
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/696
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
andygrove closed issue #712: Regression in `substr` performance from 37.1.0 to
38.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/712
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608699758
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,46 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Ad
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/449#discussion_r1608714060
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1038,6 +1038,26 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Ad
huaxingao closed pull request #456: feat: correlation support
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/456
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubs
alamb commented on PR #10592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592#issuecomment-2123171863
> What I still cannot understand is this a regression test for the bug we
missed earlier?
My strong suspicion is that the bugs @NGA-TRAN is finding would manifest
themselves as
alamb commented on issue #10453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10453#issuecomment-2123173647
> @alamb I have created 2 more bug tickets but I cannot edit the description
to add them in the subtasks. Can you help with that?
Done
--
This is an automated message fro
alamb commented on issue #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9280#issuecomment-2123183351
> I'd be happy to contribute some docs / examples if you point me at
something similar.
Thanks @aditanase 🙏
I would recommend two things:
# Suggestion 1: Change
alamb commented on code in PR #10504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10504#discussion_r1608748477
##
datafusion/functions/src/math/monotonicity.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
alamb opened a new pull request, #10607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10607
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested?
codecov-commenter commented on PR #456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/456#issuecomment-2123243529
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/456?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campai
andygrove opened a new pull request, #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-benchmarks/pull/3
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
