viirya closed issue #1113: CometExecIterator uses incorrect partition index
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1113
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
viirya commented on PR #1112:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1112#issuecomment-2497041835
Thanks @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
viirya merged PR #1112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1112
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dat
akurmustafa opened a new pull request, #13554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13554
## Which issue does this PR close?
Improves the situation in
[13550](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13550)
## Rationale for this change
While examining th
Rachelint commented on PR #12526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12526#issuecomment-2496875061
Will push it forward in next few days.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Rachelint closed pull request #12947: POC: Remove unnecessary null check for
`GroupColumn`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12947
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
Rachelint commented on PR #12947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12947#issuecomment-2496871517
It is poc version of #12996
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
Rachelint closed pull request #11943: Sketch for aggregation intermediate
results blocked management
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11943
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Rachelint commented on PR #11943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11943#issuecomment-2496856615
Codes here are stale, I will submit a new pr when starting to push it
forward.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
akurmustafa commented on PR #13497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13497#issuecomment-2496781966
> and result of those are valid. One thing that just could be noted `VALUES
('name1'), ('name2')` and `VALUES ('name1'), ('name1')` are both regarded as
not constant and not
Eason0729 commented on PR #12939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12939#issuecomment-2496607441
> Thanks @Eason0729 !
>
> I looked at #12518
>
> Could you possible add a test showing the usecase from that issue working?
>
> For example a test that does some
jonathanc-n commented on PR #13496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13496#issuecomment-2496557539
@jayzhan211 I agree, I'll try to wrap it in a subquery, i'll mark it as a
draft for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
goldmedal commented on code in PR #1541:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1541#discussion_r1855696643
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2935,12 +2935,23 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
})
} else if Token::LBracket == tok {
if di
goldmedal commented on code in PR #1541:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1541#discussion_r1855696643
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2935,12 +2935,23 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
})
} else if Token::LBracket == tok {
if di
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11943#issuecomment-2496525505
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
goldmedal commented on PR #13496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13496#issuecomment-2496518022
> @jonathanc-n, @goldmedal - thank you, I've reviewed this change and it
seems it brings back the following issue (there is additional context of why
filtering added this way produ
andygrove commented on issue #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13525#issuecomment-2496487538
> I have felt the pain points of the version upgrades. I mentioned this in
the discord server, but one thing I think we can do that will lessen this is to
push hard to get the
phillipleblanc commented on PR #13405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13405#issuecomment-2496456491
> Maybe @sgrebnov or @phillipleblanc can offer some advice about how to
proceed with this PR -- I feel like it adds significantly complexity and I am
not sure it doesn't also
peasee closed pull request #13405: fix: Remove dangling table references in
`unparser`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13405
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
Omega359 commented on PR #13394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13394#issuecomment-2496447845
I think the CI failures are a type casting issue. There are two rows in the
example that have `4000` as the values that I think are not being coerced to
strings as they should be.
timsaucer closed issue #13481: Simplify expressions swallows a cast expression
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
timsaucer merged PR #13468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13468
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
Omega359 commented on PR #13458:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13458#issuecomment-2496436510
I think a test would be in order that would showcase why the new metadata
method exists and what problem it solves.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Omega359 commented on code in PR #13458:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13458#discussion_r1855634897
##
datafusion/expr/src/udf.rs:
##
@@ -477,6 +487,15 @@ pub trait ScalarUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync {
true
}
+/// Returns the field metadata f
Omega359 commented on PR #13520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13520#issuecomment-2496343488
FYI, here is the devcontainer I personally use for all my DataFusion
development:
https://github.com/Omega359/arrow-datafusion/tree/feature/devcontainer/.devcontainer
--
This is
rluvaton commented on issue #6531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6531#issuecomment-2496321591
I'll try to add the least function in the coming week
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
alamb commented on PR #13527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13527#issuecomment-2496304460
I plan to review this carefully tomorrow
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb commented on issue #6531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6531#issuecomment-2496304090
Upate is that @rluvaton added support for greatest in
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12474
Perhaps we should file a separate ticket for `least` 🤔
--
T
alamb commented on PR #13468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13468#issuecomment-2496303274
Thank you very much @timsaucer
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
alamb commented on code in PR #13468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13468#discussion_r1855566618
##
datafusion/common/src/utils/mod.rs:
##
@@ -342,6 +342,20 @@ pub fn array_into_list_array(arr: ArrayRef, nullable:
bool) -> ListArray {
)
}
+pub fn array_
alamb commented on PR #13551:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13551#issuecomment-2496301097
Thank you @spencerscott917 🙏
Since the user documentation is generated, I think you will have to add
these examples to get the CI to pass
Here is an example of how to do
alamb merged PR #13542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13542
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13312#issuecomment-2496293704
Thanks again @findepi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
alamb merged PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13312
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #13531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13531#discussion_r1855561110
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/external_access_plan.rs:
##
@@ -369,45 +379,43 @@ struct TestData {
file_size: u64,
}
-static TEST_DATA: OnceLock = OnceLock
alamb commented on code in PR #13531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13531#discussion_r1855561330
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/external_access_plan.rs:
##
@@ -369,45 +379,43 @@ struct TestData {
file_size: u64,
}
-static TEST_DATA: OnceLock = OnceLock
alamb merged PR #13523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13523
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #13535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13535
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #13498: Subquery check_internal_plan does not support
LogicalPlan::Unnest
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13498
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
alamb commented on PR #13535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13535#issuecomment-2496289384
Thanks again @jayzhan211 and @adriangb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb closed issue #13534: Simple query fails with `column types must match
schema types`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13534
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
alamb merged PR #13543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13543
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #13547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13547
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #13533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13533
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #13491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13491#issuecomment-2496257949
Here is what I suggest we do with this PR:
1. Remove the change for https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13507
(let's do that in a separate PR)
2. Fix up the regressions intr
lovasoa commented on PR #1507:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1507#issuecomment-2496237908
I opened a new PR to enable this syntax in postgres, which supports it too:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1546
https://www.postgresql.org/d
lovasoa commented on PR #1547:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1547#issuecomment-2496235833
The new test will fail until
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1546 is merged
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
ayman-sigma commented on code in PR #1540:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1540#discussion_r1855531538
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -8349,6 +8349,13 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
pub fn parse_object_name(&mut self, in_table_clause: bool) ->
Result {
lovasoa commented on PR #1546:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1546#issuecomment-2496222357
I moved the corresponding tests from `tests/sqlparser_mssql.rs` to
`tests/sqlparser_common.rs`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
ayman-sigma commented on code in PR #1540:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1540#discussion_r1855531079
##
tests/sqlparser_snowflake.rs:
##
@@ -2846,3 +2846,32 @@ fn test_parse_show_columns_sql() {
snowflake().verified_stmt("SHOW COLUMNS IN TABLE
ayman-sigma commented on code in PR #1540:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1540#discussion_r1855531149
##
tests/sqlparser_snowflake.rs:
##
@@ -2846,3 +2846,32 @@ fn test_parse_show_columns_sql() {
snowflake().verified_stmt("SHOW COLUMNS IN TABLE
lovasoa opened a new pull request, #1546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1546
This just updates the postgres dialect definition to add support for the
json_object syntax added in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1507
The syntax was i
ankane commented on PR #1543:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1543#issuecomment-2496220674
Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
comphead commented on PR #12822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12822#issuecomment-2496217932
Filed https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13553 to add missing parts
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
comphead merged PR #12822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12822
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
lovasoa opened a new issue, #1545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1545
Postgresql supports the following syntax for the json_object function:
```sql
json_object('label' VALUE 'value')
json_object('label': 'value')
```
Reference: https://ww
lovasoa closed issue #1506: support for mssql `json_object` syntax
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1506
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
lovasoa commented on issue #1506:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1506#issuecomment-2496199367
Fixed by @gaoqiangz . Thank you !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1131
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
# What changes are included in this PR?
# Are there any user-facing c
Omega359 opened a new issue, #13552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13552
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
One of the things I've been thinking about when working on utf8view support
in udfs is what exactly datafusion should support in t
theirix commented on issue #13268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13268#issuecomment-2496157453
This issue is fixed by avoiding pushing down volatile filters, so the
sampling is achieved by a manual `random() < 0.1` expression.
@findebi, regarding the sampling suppor
spencerscott917 opened a new pull request, #13551:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13551
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes [#13399](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13399)
## Rationale for this change
Give users examples of how to use window func
Omega359 commented on PR #12822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12822#issuecomment-2496121234
I'm fine with that @comphead - we can file followup issues to add the
alternative syntax, etc
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
ccciudatu commented on PR #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/42#issuecomment-2496117721
@edmondop any clue on what the bug was? Is it the "index out of bounds"
caused by DDL statements other than crete/drop view?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
comphead commented on PR #12822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12822#issuecomment-2496113115
@Omega359 I'm planning to merge it today, getting more code conflicts, let
me know if and objections
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
SemyonSinchenko commented on PR #1118:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1118#issuecomment-2496110565
@andygrove As you mentioned in #1073, it would be interesting to remove all
logic related to `LargeList` and check if there is any regression. I did just
that and all te
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1119
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
Now that I have a better understanding of the architecture, I am updating
the documen
codecov-commenter commented on PR #:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/#issuecomment-2496096131
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
Omega359 commented on issue #13470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13470#issuecomment-2496089503
I have been looking over the sqllogictests this weekend and I think first of
all that they need a good reorganization to clean them up, split them into
smaller chunks testing j
Omega359 commented on issue #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13525#issuecomment-2496085474
On Dependency Management I have a suggestion that I think could help but
would take actual and ongoing work on the DF communities' part.
I would suggest that we file tick
andygrove commented on code in PR #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/#discussion_r1855475759
##
native/core/src/execution/operators/scan.rs:
##
@@ -365,28 +378,23 @@ struct ScanStream<'a> {
scan: ScanExec,
/// Schema representing the data
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #13549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13549#issuecomment-2496052419
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Rachelint commented on issue #13550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13550#issuecomment-2496050412
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
SemyonSinchenko opened a new pull request, #1118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1118
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1114
## Rationale for this change
Spark supports only i32 indixed arrays but Comet attempts to support both
ListArray (
alamb opened a new issue, #13549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13549
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The `corr` function is used in the h20 benchmark and is quite slow.
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion
alamb opened a new issue, #13548:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13548
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The basic aggregate functions like `COUNT` and `SUM` in DataFusion are
*very* fast (see [Apache DataFusion is now the fastest single
andygrove merged PR #1130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1130
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
andygrove merged PR #1129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1129
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
andygrove merged PR #1127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1127
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/955
# Which issue does this PR close?
None
# Rationale for this change
Based on user feedback linked in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13468 this is a change to t
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #13547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13547
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
I encountered a CI failure in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/119956
alamb opened a new pull request, #13546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13546
## Which issue does this PR close?
Related to https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1435
## Rationale for this change
This PR demonstrates what is needed to update D
alamb commented on PR #1522:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1522#issuecomment-2495967142
I think this PR needs a bit more documentation and we shoudl figure out how
to rationalize with the existing `recursion_limit` argument.
https://docs.rs/sqlpars
alamb commented on PR #1543:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1543#issuecomment-2495966670
Thanks @ankane and @iffyio
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb merged PR #1543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1543
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
alamb commented on PR #1543:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1543#issuecomment-2495966628
🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on PR #1522:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1522#issuecomment-2495966342
> Ah I see, thanks for the context @peter-toth!
>
> cc @alamb for overall thoughts on adding this dependency to sqlparser?
While adding new dependencies in gene
alamb commented on PR #1435:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1435#issuecomment-2495964382
I started looking over this PR -- and it is looking great. I took the
liberty of merging up from main and fixing clippy/fmt.
I am going to test out the implications o
berkaysynnada merged PR #13497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13497
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
berkaysynnada closed issue #13483: Order by is ignored
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13483
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #13424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13424#discussion_r1855421673
##
datafusion-examples/examples/thread_pools.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor
iffyio commented on code in PR #1435:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1435#discussion_r1855413273
##
tests/sqlparser_postgres.rs:
##
@@ -2507,6 +2520,7 @@ fn parse_array_subquery_expr() {
op: SetOperator::Union,
iffyio commented on code in PR #1538:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1538#discussion_r1855409232
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -4693,9 +4699,59 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
if_not_exists,
temporary,
to,
+
gsvgit opened a new issue, #13545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13545
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
SQL (standard) was recently extended with property graph querying features
(PGQ): [ISO standard](https://www.iso.org/standard/79473.
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1130
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes none.
# Rationale for this change
separation of concerns of internal modules and reducing public api removing
methods not
95 matches
Mail list logo
