[gitorious] Re: securing gitorious site with http authentication

2010-08-17 Thread shin938
Thanks again Benjamin, that did it: Options FollowSymLinks Options -Indexes AllowOverride None XSendFile on XSendFileAllowAbove on AuthType Basic AuthName "My Gitorious" AuthUserFile /opt/gitorious/passwd Require valid-user

[gitorious] Re: securing gitorious site with http authentication

2010-08-17 Thread shin938
Thanks. I'll try that. On Aug 17, 12:45 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, shin938 wrote: > > Hi all > > I wanted to secure gitorious site with http basic or digest > > authentication but I discovered its not so easy because gitorious is > > calling itself ov

Re: [gitorious] securing gitorious site with http authentication

2010-08-17 Thread Benjamin Podszun
Hi. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, shin938 wrote: > Hi all > I wanted to secure gitorious site with http basic or digest > authentication but I discovered its not so easy because gitorious is > calling itself over http using the gitorious_client_host in > gitorious.yml. actually I figured it

[gitorious] securing gitorious site with http authentication

2010-08-17 Thread shin938
Hi all I wanted to secure gitorious site with http basic or digest authentication but I discovered its not so easy because gitorious is calling itself over http using the gitorious_client_host in gitorious.yml. actually I figured it our only after uncommenting some debug lines in client.rb. my que

Re: [gitorious] merge request does not show whole file

2010-08-17 Thread Max Waterman
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:56 +0200, "Marius Mårnes Mathiesen" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, max wrote: > > At the moment, it seems we can only see a diff which isn't very useful > if you're trying to understand the code as a whole. > > > Actually, the merge requests are stored a

Re: [gitorious] merge request does not show whole file

2010-08-17 Thread Max Waterman
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:56 +0200, "Marius Mårnes Mathiesen" wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, max <[1]davidmaxwaterman+googlegro...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: At the moment, it seems we can only see a diff which isn't very useful if you're trying to understand the code as a whole. Actu