Re: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:36:22 -0800, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > I'm tempted to junk the whole Regex library and replace it with > one based on pcre, actually. looks interesting, is written in Haskell, but is quite big and seems to be not main

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

> I've just tried my version of RegexString with a compiler snapshot > obtained by using cvs up -D '25 December 1999' and it doesn't work > properly any more. It seems that re_match now gives a REmatch whose > first field, Array Int GroupBounds, is always indexed from 0 to some > moderately lar

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

> Ian Jackson writes ("RE: RegexString: was it really meant to > be that way ?"): > > I've just tried my version of RegexString with a compiler snapshot > > obtained by using cvs up -D '25 December 1999' and it doesn't work > > properly

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

Ian Jackson writes ("RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?"): > I've just tried my version of RegexString with a compiler snapshot > obtained by using cvs up -D '25 December 1999' and it doesn't work > properly any more. It seems that re_

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

Simon Marlow writes ("RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?"): > [ Ian Jackson: ] > > This appears to attempt to extract all of the $ strings from the > > match, regardless of whether they were actually found. Or to put it > > another way, the resu

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

> You must think I'm making a terrible nuisance of myself. Please tell > me to go away and real manuals if I'm being annoying or clueless. > > Anyway, I have another problem, with RegexString this time. > > I was trying to use mkRegex and matchRegex and I get this error: > Fail: Ix{Int}.index