On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Sven Panne wrote:
> > Is this a binary dist or a working source snapshot?
>
> That´s a binary rpm, for the source rpm replace "i386" with "src".
Oh of course. I normally avoid RPMs like the plague which is why I didn't
catch on to that :)
> > Either way I'll be downloadi
Peter I Amstutz wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Sven Panne wrote:
> > [...] I suggest that you use
> >
> >ftp://ftp.informatik.uni-muenchen.de/pub/local/pms/ghc-4.03-43.i386.rpm
>
> Is this a binary dist or a working source snapshot?
That´s a binary rpm, for the source rpm replace "i386" with
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Frank A. Christoph wrote:
> > Peter Amstutz wrote:
> > > [...] I've fooled around a bit in Haskell and was a bit
> > > disconcerted by it's lack of syntactic sugar to indicate structure
> > > (the lack of semicolons to end expressions for example :)
> >
> > Strange, for me it
Hi Simon,
may be I can help if you describe your problem
ciao
Juergen Pfitzenmaier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Are there any shared library gurus (of the Linux/ELF variety) out there?
> I'm trying to generate shared libraries for GHC's RTS and prelude, and it
> seems
> Peter Amstutz wrote:
> > [...] I've fooled around a bit in Haskell and was a bit
> > disconcerted by it's lack of syntactic sugar to indicate structure
> > (the lack of semicolons to end expressions for example :)
>
> Strange, for me it was exactly the other way round when I first
> used ML...
Peter Amstutz wrote:
> [...] I've fooled around a bit in Haskell and was a bit
> disconcerted by it's lack of syntactic sugar to indicate structure
> (the lack of semicolons to end expressions for example :)
Strange, for me it was exactly the other way round when I first
used ML... ;-)
> [...]
Hi there! I'm new to this list. I've been looking for a good
strongly-typed, type-inferencing, pattern-matching, lambda-calculus-based
modern functional programming language and the choices seem to be pretty
much ML and Haskell. I already know ML, and I like it a lot. I've fooled
around a bit
