I need to run ghc 5.02 or later on Solaris 2.6. I don't have any version
of ghc on the machine. Are there binaries for 2.6 still? Alternatively,
is it possible to build it without ghc?
mrak
--
call no man happy till he dies
-- Solon the Lawgiver, via Tom Waits
_
This is a long-standing bug which is rather tiresome to fix in general.
What I've done is to commit a fix that finds the unused bindings you
give, but does not find transitive ones. For example
Module Foo() where
f x = f t x
t = 3
Here f is used, and therefore so is
> I need to run ghc 5.02 or later on Solaris 2.6. I don't have
> any version
> of ghc on the machine. Are there binaries for 2.6 still?
> Alternatively,
> is it possible to build it without ghc?
You might find that the 2.7 binaries work on your system. Failing that,
you'll need to bootstrap GHC
I have it working on Solaris 2.8, bootstrapped from 4.08 as Simon
describes. The same procedure should work on 2.6. If you have problems
I can send you the contents of the directory after compilation. I think
the compiled directory from 2.8 would run on 2.6, as long as 64 bit mode
isn't used.
O
Hello,
is there something like extensible records in ghc?
Is it planed to?
Can anyone help?
Best regards,
Nicolas Oury
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
> Hello, is there something like extensible records in ghc?
Are you wanting something like Hugs' T-Rex or did you have something
else in mind?
--
Alastair Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reid Consulting (UK) Limited http://www.reid-consulting-uk.ltd.uk/alastair/
___
Title: Message
hello,
when i
press C-c C-l to load my file into ghci, emacs stops responding. task manager shows ghc.exe process running, so it
happens some time after the ghci buffer is created.
my
setup:
-
emacs on windows xp, version 21.1.1
- GHC
package version 5.04.1
- haskell
e
yeah, the mode needs to be updated. edit your haskell-ghci.el file ,
namely the line which begins "(setq comint-prompt-regexp" to:
(setq comint-prompt-regexp "^[\*_a-zA-Z0-9\. ]*>")
The problem is that ghc changed a bit what it outputs.
--
Hal Daume III
"Computer science is no more about c
