Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2003-07-11 Thread Mail Delivery System
This is the Postfix program at host mailgate2.isx.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text f

Returned mail: see transcript for details

2003-07-11 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
The original message was received at Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:09:41 -0400 (EDT) from grimy.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.57] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown) - Transcript of ses

Debian GHC packages

2003-07-11 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi all, Just a quick note to let you know what's going on with GHC packaging in Debian. As Michael Weber has been short of time to work on the GHC packages recently I have taken over the GHC packaging from him; the latest releases of ghc 5 and 6 are now in unstable. Unrelatedly, Isaac Jones has

-fdicts-strict ?

2003-07-11 Thread Johannes Waldmann
what exactly happens when ghc applies `-fdicts-strict' ? and what could then be the reason for Fail: Oops! Entered absent arg w_s1Bjs {GHCziBase.Ord {- tc 2c -} c {- tv a1AVd -}} when executing the compiled program? best regards, -- -- Johannes Waldmann http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.

Re: Posix library ,Concurrent Haskell and Haskell IO sub-system

2003-07-11 Thread Volker Stolz
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:39:54AM +0200, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: > (piper,pipew) <- createPipe > piperHandle <- fdToHandle(piper) > threadWaitRead ( fdToInt(handleToFd(piperHandle)) ) > message <- hGetLine piperHandle --or whatever. There's no need to call threadWaitRead, Haskell's RTS will

Re: Posix library ,Concurrent Haskell and Haskell IO sub-system

2003-07-11 Thread Rafael Martinez Torres
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Volker Stolz wrote: > > > > createPipe :: IO (Fd,Fd) (Unkown alternatives) > > I suppose you have to pass this descriptor to another process > through fork()? > Rigth. (piper,pipew) <- createPipe mpid <- forkProcess case mpid of Nothing -> do --child nobytes <

Re: Posix library ,Concurrent Haskell and Haskell IO sub-system

2003-07-11 Thread Volker Stolz
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 07:37:06AM +0200, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: > > Why do you "have to" use an Fd? > >A regular handle should be sufficient. > > Where do you get the Fd from? > > createPipe :: IO (Fd,Fd) (Unkown alternatives) I suppose you have to pass this descriptor to another process

Re: readline problem on OS X

2003-07-11 Thread Wolfgang Thaller
I think the problem with readline on Mac OS X might have been an re-occurring one. Browsing through the list archive for the past few months, however, I have not found much discussion about it. So I'd still raise the question again.. Sorry for not keeping everybody on the list up to date... I analy

Re: Posix library ,Concurrent Haskell and Haskell IO sub-system

2003-07-11 Thread Rafael Martinez Torres
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Volker Stolz wrote: > In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote: > > I use the Posix library since I have to communicate via a pipe with > > another UNIX process. > > > > Therefore I have to use > > fdRead :: Fd -> ByteCount -> IO (String,ByteCount) > > Why do you "have to"