There is already lines.
Why not generalise it to take an additional parameter '\n' and call it
split or splitBy?
There are some cases where you want to split a list not on '\n'.
Marc
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Marc Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is already lines. Why not generalise it to take an additional
parameter '\n' and call it split or splitBy? There are some cases
where you want to split a list not on '\n'.
Indeed, and in e.g. ByteString and MissingH, there are more functions
of
Greetings from Canada,
I installed Christian Maeder's binary package for the Glasgow Haskell
Compiler (ghc-6.4.1-sparc-sun-solaris2.tar.gz) which I downloaded from
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.4.1/html/users_guide/release-6-4-1.html
When I compiled a simple program, I got an error.
ghc -o
Folks,
My tests hang periodically but when I run the binaries by hand
everything works. Has anyone seen this? I'm on Mac Intel and building
the latest GHC 6.5 from darcs.
Thanks, Joel
P.S. I would be cool to have a ghc-dev list that did not include
committed patches.
joelr1:
Folks,
I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running
the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5 that
was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and
I had to Ctrl-C
dons:
joelr1:
Folks,
I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running
the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5 that
was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and
I
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
How do I do this?
I just ran make in the tests directory and it indeed picked up stage1
ghc.
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
make stage=2 does it but I wish this was documented.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
Joel Reymont wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
make stage=2 does it but I wish this was documented.
wish granted :-)
Simon
___
This is using stage2. Does it look any better?
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Jul 10 15:11:22 BST 2006
952 total tests, which gave rise to
4583 test cases, of which
11 caused framework failures
1099 were skipped
3185 expected passes
24 expected failures
joelr1:
This is using stage2. Does it look any better?
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Jul 10 15:11:22 BST 2006
952 total tests, which gave rise to
4583 test cases, of which
11 caused framework failures
1099 were skipped
3185 expected passes
24
11 matches
Mail list logo