Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html
Or suppose it did 'system("man ghc")'?
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footpr
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Marc Weber wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did notice a lot of times that I just didn't remember the name of
> option X. How to look it up? Walk through html or pdf documentation?
Just printing a link to ghc online docs is not enough because:
* maybe no internet avai
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:37:09PM +0100, Marc Weber wrote:
> The description of the -M option looks like this:
>
> -M Generate dependency information suitable for use in a Makefile.
> (copied from
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html#id3152912)
>
> It sh
Hi Gregory,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:18:42PM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:
>
> The 6.4.2 build now runs successfully to the end of the hc-build script.
Ah, good, that'll hopefully make getting 6.6 working less painful.
> The interesting thing is that out of the box using the 6.4.2
> bootstr
Hi Ian,
I have made some progress. Today I got 6.4.2 to build unregisterized on
my FreeBSD/amd64 box. I went back to 6.4.2 because the only actual
report
of success I could find record of was Wilhelm Kloke's. He used 6.4.1.
I made certain I had exactly the same versions of readline and gm
A full listing of the available flags would be useful too for a
hypothetic bash complete mode. I think that's how the bash completion
package for darcs does it.
And you know, with those three or four words compound flags, with
their number rising to .. nearly a hundred?, this would be a very
Sorry, but I'm not always connected to the Internet. I'd like to be
able to get flag help easily anyway.
-- Lennart
On Mar 13, 2007, at 14:28 , Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_gui
Hi Gregory,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:25:39AM -0500, Gregory Wright wrote:
>
> I fixed up Linker.c by replacing the calls to mmap (which will need
> fixing up anyway
> on FreeBSD/amd64) with MAP_FAILED and copying the definitions of four
> relocation
> types for X86_64 from machine/elf.h on
| > Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
| > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html
| > Now you can see it in your web browser by clicking on it.
Indeed, the installed version would be much better
it would indeed be kind of nice if ghc (perhap
| > Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
| >
| > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html
| > Now you can see it in your web browser by clicking on it.
|
| my usual warning: not anyone has 24h internet connection. i've
| switched to adsl just 1 mont
Hi Thomas,
what happened to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs ?
We are no longer able to check out your programatica sources
as described at:
http://ogi.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/Programatica/cvs.html
Already login fails with:
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs
CVS password:
PAM st
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, March 13, 2007, 5:28:30 PM, you wrote:
> Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html
> Now you can see it in your web browser by clicking on it.
my usual warning: not anyone has
Suppose ghc --full-flag-help simply printed the URL
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html
Now you can see it in your web browser by clicking on it.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
| Behalf Of
The description of the -M option looks like this:
-M Generate dependency information suitable for use in a Makefile.
(copied from
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/flag-reference.html#id3152912)
It should contain the hint that it writes this information to a Makefile.
I'm t
Hi
> What about integrating a complete list into ghc which can accessed by
> ghc --full-flag-help | less ?
> Sure I can fake it and get that list out of the html documentation. I
> just want to know if someone else would like this flag, too
I would find it very useful too.
Me too. At the sam
> What about integrating a complete list into ghc which can accessed by
> ghc --full-flag-help | less ?
> Sure I can fake it and get that list out of the html documentation. I
> just want to know if someone else would like this flag, too
I would find it very useful too.
Ganesh
=
Hi
I did notice a lot of times that I just didn't remember the name of
option X. How to look it up? Walk through html or pdf documentation?
This forces me launching either firefox, entering shortcut odocghc
(pointing to ghc help) ... HTML help ... flag reference .. which
subtopic to look at? Lets
You are quite right. I've submitted a Trac report.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
| Behalf Of Kirsten Chevalier
| Sent: 13 March 2007 10:03
| To: Albert Y. C. Lai
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: slight difference in
On 3/13/07, Kirsten Chevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed that compiling with -O -frules-off causes the test program
here to correctly print out "x". So, I was looking at the "take" rule
in GHC/List.lhs. Doesn't this rule change the strictness of take?
"take" [~1] forall n xs . tak
On 3/12/07, Kirsten Chevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/12/07, Kirsten Chevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Albert Y. C. Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > main = print (map (const 'x') (take 1 (undefined:undefined)))
> >
> > In ghci, or with ghc -O0, this produces "x".
> > Wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
