Tim Chevalier wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any known problems with retainer profiling in GHC 6.8.2? I
have a program that takes 3 minutes to run with normal profiling
enabled (+RTS -P -RTS), but with +RTS -P -hr -RTS, it's 20 minutes and
counting. I can tell that progress is being made since the
Daniel Gorín wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
data Target = Target TargetId (Maybe (StringBuffer,ClockTime))
looks great. How is this intended to be used,
i.e. what should happen if there is an edit/save event in
The IRC meeting will be held today at 16:00 UK time as usual (there wasn't
any support for moving it to 21:00). Simon PJ is back from holiday and
should make it this time.
Any suggestions for discussion topics? One idea we have is to talk about
the GHC API.
Cheers,
Simon
It would be nice if we could make some more progress on the revision
control issue from last week. I don't know if people are ready to
actually make a choice of RCS at this stage, but I've tried to make
all the information necessary to make a choice available at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One idea we have is to talk about the GHC API.
I am generally interested in this,
but cannot contribute much at the moment.
Best regards, J.W.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE -
Hi all,
SimonPJ asked me to summarise the problems I've been having with GHC's
new build system with the idea that we could perhaps talk a bit about
this during today's IRC meeting. The context is the Data Parallel
Haskell project and in particular the dph packages which need a number
of
For infrequent updaters like myself, it would also be nice just to have a
HEADS UP before and after periods of larger than usual instability
(such as build system replacements).
And, talking about #ghc, I've got the suspicion that this channel is
partly to blame for the occasional
We can talk about the general issues on IRC. But I thought I'd answer a
few of the specific questions quickly:
Roman Leschinskiy wrote:
I don't think I understand how GHC itself is built any longer, either.
What does cabal-bin do?
It's effectively a pre-compiled Setup.hs for packages that
Claus Reinke wrote:
For infrequent updaters like myself, it would also be nice just to have
a HEADS UP before and after periods of larger than usual instability
(such as build system replacements).
And, talking about #ghc, I've got the suspicion that this channel is
partly to blame for the
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 14:46 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I don't think I understand how GHC itself is built any longer, either.
What does cabal-bin do?
It's effectively a pre-compiled Setup.hs for packages that have no need for
a custom Setup.hs. cabal-install does the same job for
On 30/07/2008, at 23:46, Simon Marlow wrote:
We can talk about the general issues on IRC. But I thought I'd
answer a few of the specific questions quickly:
Thanks, Simon!
Roman Leschinskiy wrote:
I don't think I understand how GHC itself is built any longer,
either. What does
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:55:09AM +1000, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
I see. So it looks at the Build-Type in the package description and
calls the right defaultMain if it's not Custom. And if my Setup.hs
isn't standard then it's my responsibility to set the Build-Type to
Custom in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
