Magicloud wrote:
I see So 6.8.3 is not portable
So in my company-customed-linux box, ghc is nothing to me?
Any way I can use it?
Yes install 6.4.2, as the last poster suggested, and then use 6.4.2 to
build 6.8.3.
Alternatively, and probably more simply, get a binary dist.
Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But finally installation succeeded (editline is missing and the arrow
keys don't work).
This means that the editline package could not be built for some
reason. Is this on your OS X machine?
Hi Judah,
libedit is simply missing. but ghci used to work with readline! Do I
need to install i.e.
http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/libedit-20080712-2.11.tar.gz
as a static library in order to create code depending on libedit that
can be run on machines without libedit? (This reminds me to the
Am Dienstag, 23. September 2008 19:07 schrieben Sie:
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs, MultiParamTypeClasses, FunctionalDependencies #-}
data GADT a where
GADT :: GADT ()
class Class a b | a - b
instance Class () ()
fun :: (Class a b) = GADT a - b
fun GADT = ()
I’d expect this to
Dear GHC developers,
I have tested ghc-6.10.0.20080921
on
* making it by ghc-6.8.2,
* making it by itself,
* the DoCon and Dumatel applications.
It looks all right.
Regards,
-
Serge Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
This was on Linux, Debian.
I have tested ghc-6.10.0.20080921
on
* making it by ghc-6.8.2,
* making it by itself,
* the DoCon and Dumatel applications.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:55:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I thought, someone said that with the new typing machinery in GHC 6.10, more
functional dependency programs are accepted because functional dependencies
are handled similarly to type families (or something like that). Is
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 15:11 schrieb Ian Lynagh:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:55:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I thought, someone said that with the new typing machinery in GHC 6.10,
more functional dependency programs are accepted because functional
dependencies are handled
Wolfgang writes
| data GADT a where
|
| GADT :: GADT ()
|
| class Class a b | a - b
|
| instance Class () ()
|
| fun :: (Class a b) = GADT a - b
| fun GADT = ()
You're right that this program should typecheck. In the case branch we
discover (locally) that a~(), and hence by the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Do you have libedit on your linux machine (because I haven't)?
I do not know what is libedit and where to find it.
In order to check this:
Does ghc-pkg list the editline package? (And do your arrow keys and
backspace work
Hello Simon,
thank you for your extensive answer!
I think, I’ll try to work around the fundep deficiencies and if that doesn’t
work, switch to type families.
But your answer raised further questions/comments:
class (F a ~ b) = C a b
type family F a
(Note for 6.10 users:
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Do you have libedit on your linux machine (because I haven't)?
I do not know what is libedit and where to find it.
It's the library needed for editline
* Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-24 19:18:28+0200]
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Do you have libedit on your linux machine (because I haven't)?
I do not know what is libedit and where to find it.
It's the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Judah,
libedit is simply missing. but ghci used to work with readline! Do I
need to install i.e.
http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/libedit-20080712-2.11.tar.gz
as a static library in order to create code depending on
Hi Roman,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:35:50PM +0300, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
libedit on Debian is very out-dated[1]. Haskell bindings (editline)
doesn't compile against it (at least I could not compile it).
1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/editline.html
That's the wrong package; you
This has never worked with fundeps, because it involves a *local* type equality (one that holds
in some places and not others) and my implementation of fundeps is fundamentally based on
*global* equality. Prior to GADTs that was fine!
Actually, how does that relate to reasoning under
On Sep 22, 2008, at 13:43 , Christian Maeder wrote:
Matthias Kilian wrote:
2.
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
gmake[1]: *** [binary-dist] Error 1
-e does not work for test under sh, so I changed it to -r:
... if [ -r $$FILE ]; then ...
I doubt `-e' doesn't work on Solaris, because `-e' is
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Claus Reinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantage is ghci works without editline and readline. The
disadvantage is if you want arrow keys and backspace to work, you should
have installed http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ first.
libedit on Debian is very
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:02:23AM +, Wei Hu wrote:
I forgot to mention that I was running the binary package -- didn't bother to
build ghc from source. Because the binary package relies on libedit.so.0 and
Debian only comes with libedit2, I created a symbolic link for libedit.so.0
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:43:53AM -0600, humasect wrote:
installPackage: internal error: stg_ap_ppp_ret
(GHC version 6.8.3 for i386_apple_darwin)
Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug
make[2]: *** [build.stage.1] Abort trap
make[1]: ***
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Right now we have the source bundles:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src.tar.bz2
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src-extralibs.tar.bz2
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused. If the bootstrapping GHC uses a gmp from a non-standard
directory, then that directory should be listed in the library-dirs
field of the rts package.
Running strings on the bootstrap compiler's lib/ghc-6.8.3/libHSrts*
shows some references to
Would it be possible to use haskeline as a fallback/default,
for future Ghc's?
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haskeline
As the author of haskeline, integrating it into ghc is on my TODO
list. :-)
Good to hear!-)
Note that the earliest this could happen would be
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:02:28PM -0400, Paul Jarc wrote:
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused. If the bootstrapping GHC uses a gmp from a non-standard
directory, then that directory should be listed in the library-dirs
field of the rts package.
Running strings on
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running
ghc-pkg describe rts
will show you library-dirs, amongst other things.
Ah, ok. Well, the gmp library directory is indeed listed there. But
what exactly is ghc supposed to do with it? From the behavior I'm
seeing, it looks like it passes -Ldir
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:43:53AM -0600, humasect wrote:
installPackage: internal error: stg_ap_ppp_ret
(GHC version 6.8.3 for i386_apple_darwin)
Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug
make[2]: *** [build.stage.1] Abort trap
make[1]:
I notice that speed from code generated by -fasm and -fvia-C isn't
significant, furthermore -fvia-C takes longer time. So, why ghc still needs
gcc (at least on Windows)?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is--fvia-C-still-needed--tp19663119p19663119.html
Sent from the
27 matches
Mail list logo
