Re: [Haskell-cafe] HPong-0.1.2 fails to compile in Debian ghc 6.10.1

2009-04-23 Thread Trent W. Buck
"Ahn, Ki Yung" writes: >>> I think this is because the filename of the OpenGL shared library is >>> /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 rather than libGL.so. >> >> No. Do not manually create the symlink. It sounds like you don't >> have the -dev packages for OpenGL installed. > > I do already have the dev packa

Re: 6.10.3 plans

2009-04-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 05:59 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: > On 4/23/2009 02:05, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: > > > >> Hi Ian, > >> > >> thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do > >> another > >> release cycle so soo

Re: [Haskell-cafe] HPong-0.1.2 fails to compile in Debian ghc 6.10.1

2009-04-23 Thread Ahn, Ki Yung
John Goerzen wrote: Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: I don't know the exact reason but this should not fail since I have Debian packaged ghc 6.10.1 and OpenGL-2.2.1.1 on my system. I think this is because the filename of the OpenGL shared library is /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 rather than libGL.so. This is why w

Re: [Haskell-cafe] HPong-0.1.2 fails to compile in Debian ghc 6.10.1

2009-04-23 Thread John Goerzen
Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: > I don't know the exact reason but this should not fail since I have > Debian packaged ghc 6.10.1 and OpenGL-2.2.1.1 on my system. > > I think this is because the filename of the OpenGL shared library is > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 rather than libGL.so. This is why we have two

Re: 6.10.3 plans

2009-04-23 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
On 4/23/2009 02:05, Duncan Coutts wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Hi Ian, thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do another release cycle so soon after 6.10.2. The suggested fixes seem agreeable to me, but I have one _minor_ addition

Re: 6.10.3 plans

2009-04-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: > Hi Ian, > > thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do another > release cycle so soon after 6.10.2. The suggested fixes seem agreeable to > me, but I have one _minor_ additional request for 6.10.3 if you end havi

RE: 6.10.3 plans

2009-04-23 Thread Bayley, Alistair
> From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org > [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf > Of Alexander Dunlap > > > > An exception to this rule is that we will probably also > rebundle time in > > the bindists, as that has little chance of breaking anything else. > > Wo