More Hoopling later, I see this segment in the rewrite function:
middle m@(CmmUnsafeForeignCall _ fs _) live = return $
case map spill (filter (flip elemRegSet (on_stack live)) fs) ++
map reload (uniqSetToList (kill fs (in_regs live))) of
[] -> Nothing
Am 01.02.11 12:34, schrieb Daniel Fischer:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 11:45:58, Julian Bean wrote:
>>> It indeed does, even though I doubted it at first. As far as I
>>> remember the type in
>>>
>>>getnArrayST n bs :: ST s (Maybe (UArray Int Word8, [Word8])) =
>>>
>>> used to be necessary t
Hi,
I have problem with ghci+cairo on windows. When I try to load, for
example like this "ghci -package cairo" it fails with the following
error:
Loading package random-1.0.0.2 ... linking ... done.
Loading package haskell98 ... linking ... done.
Loading package syb-0.1.0.2 ... linking ... done.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:01:04PM +0300, Pavel Perikov wrote:
> If anyone interested...
>
> Agda-2.2.9 compiled perfectly with 7.0.1 release but with 7.1.20110131 the
> compiler had a few problems including "impossible happened" when building
> profiling library.
Possibly related:
http://ha
If anyone interested...
Agda-2.2.9 compiled perfectly with 7.0.1 release but with 7.1.20110131 the
compiler had a few problems including "impossible happened" when building
profiling library.
Another one was in src/full/Agda/TypeChecking/Positivity.hs @ 260:
instance ComputeOccurrences Term wh
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:19:23AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> It's time to consider again whether we should migrate GHC development
> from darcs to (probably) git.
The Boost project has been having similar discussions about when, how
and if to migrate to Git, together with discussions on wheth
You are misunderstanding what 'undecidable instances' does.
s/undecidable/incoherent/g
Claus
GHC wants to solve the constraint (D Foo beta) where beta is
as-yet-unconstrained type variable. It finds that one instance *matches*
(by instantiating only the instance declaration, not the constra
On OSX, as of 10.5, both the 32-bit kernel and the 64-bit kernel can seamlessly
run x86_64 binaries in 64-bit mode.
MacPorts now defaults to 64-bit for instance.
mc
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:10 PM, John Meacham wrote:
> Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of
> macs use
To make it clear. Leopard (released October 2007) fully supports x86_64
executables. Given upgrade rate of Mac community I think it's pretty safe to
state that majority of mac owners have x86-64 capable systems.
pavel
On 01.02.2011, at 15:30, malcolm.wallace wrote:
> MacOS 10.5 is still largel
MacOS 10.5 is still largely 32-bit. MacOS 10.6 is largely 64-bit. Both are capable of compiling and running for the alternative word-size choice, fairly transparently. 10.6 was released August 2009, but there are likely plenty of people still running 10.5.Regards,
MalcolmOn 01 Feb, 2011,at 1
Max Cantor writes:
Thanks Debbie,
I've confirmed with the other chaps (for the second chalet).
Is there any news on a boat for us?
Regards
Tim
> The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August
> 2007. The bulk of them were discontinued in 2006, along with PowerPC
> Macs.
On 01.02.2011, at 15:10, John Meacham wrote:
> Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of
> macs used a 32 bit build of OSX and 32 bit programs?
Mac OS X started supporting 64-bit console application since Tiger. Since
Leopard it supports 64-bit gui apps. Currently we a
Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of
macs used a 32 bit build of OSX and 32 bit programs?
John
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Max Cantor wrote:
> The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The
> bulk of them were discontinued in
The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The
bulk of them were discontinued in 2006, along with PowerPC Macs. Does it make
sense to relegate OSX x86_64 to community status while the 32-bit version is
considered a supported platform?
Given that I'm far from ex
You are misunderstanding what 'undecidable instances' does.
GHC wants to solve the constraint (D Foo beta) where beta is
as-yet-unconstrained type variable. It finds that one instance *matches* (by
instantiating only the instance declaration, not the constraint we are solving):
D a b
bu
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 11:45:58, Julian Bean wrote:
> > It indeed does, even though I doubted it at first. As far as I
> > remember the type in
> >
> >getnArrayST n bs :: ST s (Maybe (UArray Int Word8, [Word8])) =
> >
> > used to be necessary to bind the type variable s. Apparently thing
On 01.02.2011, at 14:30, John Lato wrote:
>
> The key point is you need a 64-bit bootstrap compiler
Ok, I see :) I thought if I have 64-bit compiler I wouldn't have to build one :)
pavel
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@
>
> Subject: building ghc-7.1.20110125 under Mac OS X
>
> hi list.
>
> i have to build ghc-7.1.20110125 under mac os x, so i grabbed the stable
> snapshot. Everything builds fine but the resulting compiler has problems
> with ld. It passes gcc flags to ld like "-march=-i686". Any ideas?
>
> BTW wh
> It indeed does, even though I doubted it at first. As far as I remember
> the type in
>
>getnArrayST n bs :: ST s (Maybe (UArray Int Word8, [Word8])) =
>
> used to be necessary to bind the type variable s. Apparently things
> have become easier.
The higher-rank inference has been change
Am 01.02.11 11:05, schrieb Daniel Fischer:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 10:20:26, Carsten Schultz wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to compile some code that I have written a long time ago
>> (might have been for ghc 6.3), and I have not done much Haskell in the
>> meantime. I have trou
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 10:20:26, Carsten Schultz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to compile some code that I have written a long time ago
> (might have been for ghc 6.3), and I have not done much Haskell in the
> meantime. I have trouble compiling the code, maybe only because I do
>
A panic is always a bug. Thanks for the test case. I've created a ticket
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4939
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
| users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Gorín
| Sent: 3
Hello everyone,
I am trying to compile some code that I have written a long time ago
(might have been for ghc 6.3), and I have not done much Haskell in the
meantime. I have trouble compiling the code, maybe only because I do
not remember the necessary flags (yes, these should be in the source
fil
On 01/02/2011 00:01, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Current theory:
c1jj:
_s1ep::I32 = I32[(slot<_s1ep::I32> + 4)]; // CmmAssign
_s1fP::I32 = I32[(slot<_s1fP::I32> + 4)]; // CmmAssign
// outOfLine should follow:
_s1eq::F64 = F64[_s1fP::I32 + 3]; // CmmAssign
24 matches
Mail list logo
